4 Comments

Summary:

According to TechCrunch’s Steve Cheney, Apple won’t be introducing an LTE-capable handset when it launches its CDMA-based iPhone early in January, despite Verizon’s indication that it wouldn’t offer one otherwise. But Apple’s gone further: even its mid-year iPhone refresh won’t use a 4G network.

iphone_4_antenna_thumb

According to TechCrunch’s Steve Cheney, Apple won’t be introducing an LTE-capable handset when it launches its CDMA-based iPhone early in January, despite Verizon’s indication that it wouldn’t offer one otherwise. But Apple’s gone even further: Even its mid-year iPhone refresh won’t be getting 4G network support.

Instead, Apple will offer a dual-mode GSM/CDMA device when it refreshes the iPhone around June or July, according to sources. That handset will then be able to work universally on all networks worldwide, though it won’t be on the cutting edge of connectivity speeds. AT&T plans to launch LTE networks in 2011, and many other major international carriers have similar plans. Rogers in Canada, for instance, launched its first LTE trial just last week.

Apple made a similar move with its launch of the first iPhone, which came out in 2007 with only EDGE technology built-in, despite the wide availability of 3G on AT&T at the time. While it might seem like Apple is missing the boat, in truth avoiding the first line of 4G chips keeps costs down, and likely also leads to a better quality product finding its way to consumer hands.

Cheney’s sources turned out to be correct about the Verizon iPhone, which is now being confirmed by multiple major news outlets, and I think this latest report will also turn out to be true. It’s in keeping with how Apple has operated historically, and it makes sense from a business perspective. Apple doesn’t need to take a risk on 4G yet, since it probably isn’t a priority for the bulk of consumers who drive iPhone sales.

If providers manage to establish well-supported LTE networks by 2011, then we can expect Apple to move to the new standard with its 2012 device. But that’s a big if. Whenever they do make the switch, expect it to be a decision based on real consumer demand and supply chain maturity, not network CEO ultimatums and competitor baiting. In the meantime, even just a CDMA-capable version of the iPhone should translate into ample revenue to tide over Apple’s investors.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

  1. Mark Hernandez Monday, October 11, 2010

    Glad to know this is now a hard, cold indisputable fact.

    Share
  2. How in the world does “delaying” or “waiting” to support LTE equal “skipping”?

    Share
  3. The great news is that with the Rover Puck, you can still get 4G on all of your iOS devices. The Puck acts as a Wi-Fi network to up to 8 devices – so bust out your iPhone, iPod touch, iPad and MacBook Pro to get that 4G. It’s so small you can just keep it in your pocket or purse and forget it’s there, while still getting the speed you need. There are lots of rumors going around about Apple and 4G – but luckily no one has to wait for Apple to get around to it. Have you heard of the Rover Puck, Darrell?

    Joe – I think it’s skipping because by the time Apple gets on board, won’t there be a new technology available that’s even FASTER? Rumors are that Korea has 5G! GGGGG! I hope the Puck will work on that, too!

    Jamala at Rover.com

    Share
  4. Great, if the iPhone were to support both CDMA and GSM, it will have to have radios for 3 versions of CDMA: 1G, Rev2 (3G), and CDMA’s version of LTE, plus 3 for GSM: EDGE, 3G, and LTE. Since none of these technologies cover the entire occupied land area of the US by themselves, one’s phone will be continously switched between all of them. What fun.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post