<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Open Converged Infrastructure Compete?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Claims 4,000 Server Customers: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/#comment-598648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cisco Claims 4,000 Server Customers: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=1159#comment-598648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Cisco isn&#8217;t alone in converged infrastructure success. Egenera, a company that takes a somewhat more-open approach to unified systems management, last week reported its best financial year ever. It has been selling its PAN Manager software and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cisco isn&#8217;t alone in converged infrastructure success. Egenera, a company that takes a somewhat more-open approach to unified systems management, last week reported its best financial year ever. It has been selling its PAN Manager software and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Bias</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/#comment-303297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Bias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=1159#comment-303297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Derrick,


  I can show you some of the information, but no, it&#039;s a base configuration.  You can&#039;t buy most of the gear for less than 200K.  For example, an EMC CX4-120 in the smallest configuration possible is at least 300K.  The Forrester #s are wrong.

  I would be happy to walk you through what I have if you want to see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derrick,</p>
<p>  I can show you some of the information, but no, it&#8217;s a base configuration.  You can&#8217;t buy most of the gear for less than 200K.  For example, an EMC CX4-120 in the smallest configuration possible is at least 300K.  The Forrester #s are wrong.</p>
<p>  I would be happy to walk you through what I have if you want to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/#comment-303118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=1159#comment-303118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;From what I understand, these were for base configurations, not including additional software or service. Could that explain the difference?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, these were for base configurations, not including additional software or service. Could that explain the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Bias</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/10/can-open-converged-infrastructure-compete-2/#comment-303117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Bias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=1159#comment-303117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The proposals I saw for VBlocks were 2.25M and IBM CloudBurst was 1.75M.  Not sure where Forrester got their numbers.  The Cisco switch gear alone is more than 200K.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposals I saw for VBlocks were 2.25M and IBM CloudBurst was 1.75M.  Not sure where Forrester got their numbers.  The Cisco switch gear alone is more than 200K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
