<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox for Android Beta Hands-on Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 00:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 04:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every mobile platform already has a WebKit based browser. Even Bada has just gone WebKit.

Well there is one exception. The only mobile platform without a WebKit browser is Microsoft&#039;s Windows Phone 7, where Microsoft has chased away other browser vendors by denying them access to the native code that its inbuilt IE7 Mobile has access to.

Mozilla made an announcement some months ago that it would not be developing anything for Windows Phone 7. It&#039;s kind of ironic, as this is the platform that would surely need an alternate browser more than any other, as it has no WebKit alternative. If only Microsoft would allow them access to that native code.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every mobile platform already has a WebKit based browser. Even Bada has just gone WebKit.</p>
<p>Well there is one exception. The only mobile platform without a WebKit browser is Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone 7, where Microsoft has chased away other browser vendors by denying them access to the native code that its inbuilt IE7 Mobile has access to.</p>
<p>Mozilla made an announcement some months ago that it would not be developing anything for Windows Phone 7. It&#8217;s kind of ironic, as this is the platform that would surely need an alternate browser more than any other, as it has no WebKit alternative. If only Microsoft would allow them access to that native code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prerna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prerna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review ...I was eagerly waiting for firefox for Andriod...because I am prone to firefox on PC...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review &#8230;I was eagerly waiting for firefox for Andriod&#8230;because I am prone to firefox on PC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlinehandyman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Onlinehandyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the hands on review.  I use the desktop version and am waiting for the Android, but your review is very much what I expected.  I think I am going to wait somewhat longer.  Sounds like they are going in the right direction though!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the hands on review.  I use the desktop version and am waiting for the Android, but your review is very much what I expected.  I think I am going to wait somewhat longer.  Sounds like they are going in the right direction though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brubeck</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Brubeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It also borrows a feature from the Android Dolphin Browser that I like: Bookmarks and preferences are accessed by sliding the screen to the right and left, respectively.&quot;

Hey!  Mobile Firefox has been doing that since its first Maemo alpha releases in 2008!  :)

With that aside, thanks a bunch for the great review and thoughtful critique.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It also borrows a feature from the Android Dolphin Browser that I like: Bookmarks and preferences are accessed by sliding the screen to the right and left, respectively.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey!  Mobile Firefox has been doing that since its first Maemo alpha releases in 2008!  :)</p>
<p>With that aside, thanks a bunch for the great review and thoughtful critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gmich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed, James. Not nearly ready in my view. Tried it out last night but was underwhelmed.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, James. Not nearly ready in my view. Tried it out last night but was underwhelmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/08/firefox-for-android-beta-hands-on-review/#comment-441171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=69511#comment-441171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty good overview of mobile FireFox James. For now I&#039;m skipping FF just because of it not rendering the pages like the other browsers that are available for Android.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good overview of mobile FireFox James. For now I&#8217;m skipping FF just because of it not rendering the pages like the other browsers that are available for Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
