<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad App Design: River of News vs. Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/09/27/ipad-app-design-river-of-news-vs-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/27/ipad-app-design-river-of-news-vs-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/27/ipad-app-design-river-of-news-vs-twitter/#comment-526060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50802#comment-526060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#039;t convinces by the Twitter iPad app at first (like everyone else, it seems). Now I&#039;ve given it a chance I have to say I think it&#039;s one of the nicest UIs I&#039;ve ever used. Given its functionality, I find it incredibly simple and intuitive to use. I think it uses the iPad&#039;s features excellently without being gimmicky, and I think as the iPad slowly replaces laptops for more and more tasks, this is exactly the kind of app we need to be seeing more of.

What I love about this app is the visual history. The panes show you where you&#039;ve been. Surely better than a back button, a list, or nothing at all; especially when the might of Twitter lies in its massive network of simple information. It&#039;s a tidy way to separate threads of information. The panes function as tabs or windows may on a desktop browser. And dismissing them to leave you with the main pane is always just a flick away (I love that icon, and the gesture and metaphor is consistent with the ingenious way to refresh). Composing a new message doesn&#039;t clear what you were previously doing, but instead pushes it aside, ready for you to go back to for reference or once you&#039;re finished.

I strongly recommend anybody with an iPad who&#039;s into Twitter to give this app a good test drive before giving up on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t convinces by the Twitter iPad app at first (like everyone else, it seems). Now I&#8217;ve given it a chance I have to say I think it&#8217;s one of the nicest UIs I&#8217;ve ever used. Given its functionality, I find it incredibly simple and intuitive to use. I think it uses the iPad&#8217;s features excellently without being gimmicky, and I think as the iPad slowly replaces laptops for more and more tasks, this is exactly the kind of app we need to be seeing more of.</p>
<p>What I love about this app is the visual history. The panes show you where you&#8217;ve been. Surely better than a back button, a list, or nothing at all; especially when the might of Twitter lies in its massive network of simple information. It&#8217;s a tidy way to separate threads of information. The panes function as tabs or windows may on a desktop browser. And dismissing them to leave you with the main pane is always just a flick away (I love that icon, and the gesture and metaphor is consistent with the ingenious way to refresh). Composing a new message doesn&#8217;t clear what you were previously doing, but instead pushes it aside, ready for you to go back to for reference or once you&#8217;re finished.</p>
<p>I strongly recommend anybody with an iPad who&#8217;s into Twitter to give this app a good test drive before giving up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickla</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/27/ipad-app-design-river-of-news-vs-twitter/#comment-390341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50802#comment-390341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found Twitter for iPad very difficult: I couldn&#039;t work out how to dismiss all the panels that I&#039;d called and get back to the Twitter stream. I went straight back to Twitterific.

But I really like your general message that there isn&#039;t one correct way to design apps, something that bears repeating in the face of the dogma that everything on the iPad has to be minimalistic. And I certainly don&#039;t think &quot;the customer is always right&quot;; it can be useful to adjust one&#039;s own thinking to open up new possibilities. Perhaps you could go into a bit more detail about the specific things you learnt about the Twitter app that made it easier to use after your initial disorientation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Twitter for iPad very difficult: I couldn&#8217;t work out how to dismiss all the panels that I&#8217;d called and get back to the Twitter stream. I went straight back to Twitterific.</p>
<p>But I really like your general message that there isn&#8217;t one correct way to design apps, something that bears repeating in the face of the dogma that everything on the iPad has to be minimalistic. And I certainly don&#8217;t think &#8220;the customer is always right&#8221;; it can be useful to adjust one&#8217;s own thinking to open up new possibilities. Perhaps you could go into a bit more detail about the specific things you learnt about the Twitter app that made it easier to use after your initial disorientation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
