<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publishers Should Be Careful What They Wish For</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jobs to Media Co&#8217;s: It&#8217;s My Way or the Highway: Tech News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-584653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Jobs to Media Co&#8217;s: It&#8217;s My Way or the Highway: Tech News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-584653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] became obvious when some media outlets started negotiating with Apple about a subscription-based newsstand &#8212; a service the company is expected to announce tomorrow, as part of the launch of Rupert [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] became obvious when some media outlets started negotiating with Apple about a subscription-based newsstand &#8212; a service the company is expected to announce tomorrow, as part of the launch of Rupert [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issuu Gives Up on App Store After Three Rejections: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-522893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Issuu Gives Up on App Store After Three Rejections: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-522893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a popular document sharing service that may have provided some competition for Apple&#8217;s planned digital newsstand, has abandoned plans to release an iOS app after Apple rejected the company three times. The New [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a popular document sharing service that may have provided some competition for Apple&#8217;s planned digital newsstand, has abandoned plans to release an iOS app after Apple rejected the company three times. The New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Review: Apple&#8217;s subscription plan, the exodus from objectivity, and startup guides galore » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-283192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week in Review: Apple&#8217;s subscription plan, the exodus from objectivity, and startup guides galore » Nieman Journalism Lab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-283192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the situation to Apple&#8217;s treatment of the music industry with iTunes, and GigaOM&#8217;s Mathew Ingram and TechCrunch&#8217;s MG Siegler wondered whether publishers would balk at giving up data about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the situation to Apple&#8217;s treatment of the music industry with iTunes, and GigaOM&#8217;s Mathew Ingram and TechCrunch&#8217;s MG Siegler wondered whether publishers would balk at giving up data about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack C</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-281220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-281220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you really nailed the trade-off. Much depends on the specifics of the agreement with Apple and how the arrangement fits into a broader strategy. 

If publishers utilize iTunes as part of a larger effort to leverage new means of distribution, while simultaneously taking a hard look at operational costs and trimming down, it could work.

If, however, they view iTunes, and iTunes alone, as their silver bullet, long term success is less likely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you really nailed the trade-off. Much depends on the specifics of the agreement with Apple and how the arrangement fits into a broader strategy. </p>
<p>If publishers utilize iTunes as part of a larger effort to leverage new means of distribution, while simultaneously taking a hard look at operational costs and trimming down, it could work.</p>
<p>If, however, they view iTunes, and iTunes alone, as their silver bullet, long term success is less likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Adler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-281125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Adler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-281125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t periodicals use third parties to sell subscriptions to their paper versions. Why would this be different?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t periodicals use third parties to sell subscriptions to their paper versions. Why would this be different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-280772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-280772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: music labels counting pennies. You can&#039;t really compare the music business to the news business. There is a new product every morning with news. There is a new product once a year with a music group. The pennies add up a lot quicker in news.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: music labels counting pennies. You can&#8217;t really compare the music business to the news business. There is a new product every morning with news. There is a new product once a year with a music group. The pennies add up a lot quicker in news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-280771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-280771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogs like this one have a vested interest in seeing newspapers and magazines fail. But the truth is, old media will make a fortune again on this and, in an app world, blogs like this on the web will be forgotten.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs like this one have a vested interest in seeing newspapers and magazines fail. But the truth is, old media will make a fortune again on this and, in an app world, blogs like this on the web will be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen van Duffelen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-280677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen van Duffelen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-280677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well the points of 1) loosing 30% of the revenue, 2) not being in full control of features and costs, 3) and being dictated by Apple if it comes down to what sort of content is allowed, are already mentioned here. So I dont have to go into that... But what about all those users that do not buy an iPad but go for another tablet? What are publishers going to do with those potential customers? Create another newsstand for all those different app stores/operating systems? Crazy!

Apple is creating a hype again and if publishers are smart enough they do not jump in on it but think about the near future - when there will be more than one decent tablet on the market.

Instead of going for the vendor and device lock-in model publishers should use the capabilities of the web. Instead of building native apps for 1 or 2 devices they should go full on web.

All those upcoming tablets come with modern web browsers that support HTML5 and CSS3. For news and magazine publishers these &quot;new&quot; technologies offer great possibilities to develop outstanding web based applications with a native look and feel and an appealing user experience! 

At Widescript.com we are already doing this for the educational market. We&#039;re building a device and app store independent platform for students to study interactive educational content like e-books and articles. Everything is based on web standards and the &quot;web app&quot; looks, feels and acts like a native app. But we, our students, teachers and publisher are in full control of what is going on on that platform. Plus... we are not loosing 30% of our revenue. Instead we can charge our customers a little less and still make more than if we would be selling through the apps store. And let&#039;s not forget as we are building for the web - we&#039;re available on mobile phones and desktop pc&#039;s or laptops as well. Freedom of choice for every user/customer to choose the device he wants to use! 

As we are building the educational e-reading platform we are experimenting with more interactive and magazine/paper like features. So if there are any publishers that do not want to get locked-in by Apple but are looking for other ways of getting their content to tablets please get in contact!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the points of 1) loosing 30% of the revenue, 2) not being in full control of features and costs, 3) and being dictated by Apple if it comes down to what sort of content is allowed, are already mentioned here. So I dont have to go into that&#8230; But what about all those users that do not buy an iPad but go for another tablet? What are publishers going to do with those potential customers? Create another newsstand for all those different app stores/operating systems? Crazy!</p>
<p>Apple is creating a hype again and if publishers are smart enough they do not jump in on it but think about the near future &#8211; when there will be more than one decent tablet on the market.</p>
<p>Instead of going for the vendor and device lock-in model publishers should use the capabilities of the web. Instead of building native apps for 1 or 2 devices they should go full on web.</p>
<p>All those upcoming tablets come with modern web browsers that support HTML5 and CSS3. For news and magazine publishers these &#8220;new&#8221; technologies offer great possibilities to develop outstanding web based applications with a native look and feel and an appealing user experience! </p>
<p>At Widescript.com we are already doing this for the educational market. We&#8217;re building a device and app store independent platform for students to study interactive educational content like e-books and articles. Everything is based on web standards and the &#8220;web app&#8221; looks, feels and acts like a native app. But we, our students, teachers and publisher are in full control of what is going on on that platform. Plus&#8230; we are not loosing 30% of our revenue. Instead we can charge our customers a little less and still make more than if we would be selling through the apps store. And let&#8217;s not forget as we are building for the web &#8211; we&#8217;re available on mobile phones and desktop pc&#8217;s or laptops as well. Freedom of choice for every user/customer to choose the device he wants to use! </p>
<p>As we are building the educational e-reading platform we are experimenting with more interactive and magazine/paper like features. So if there are any publishers that do not want to get locked-in by Apple but are looking for other ways of getting their content to tablets please get in contact!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-280550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-280550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a great point, Todd. And thanks for the compliment -- and the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Todd. And thanks for the compliment &#8212; and the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/09/20/publishers-should-be-careful-what-they-wish-for/#comment-280389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=158011#comment-280389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Use of &quot;Faustian bargain&quot; = WIN

I&#039;d also add the specter of DRM raising its ugly head. Dinosaur media will instantly regress to wanting their content &quot;defective by design&quot; - If you&#039;ll remember that was the ONLY reason the big music companies agreed to Apples terms circa ~2002 ( eventually dropped in 2007 ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of &#8220;Faustian bargain&#8221; = WIN</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also add the specter of DRM raising its ugly head. Dinosaur media will instantly regress to wanting their content &#8220;defective by design&#8221; &#8211; If you&#8217;ll remember that was the ONLY reason the big music companies agreed to Apples terms circa ~2002 ( eventually dropped in 2007 ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
