6 Comments

Summary:

Hewlett-Packard is suing its former chairman and CEO, Mark Hurd, alleging breach of contract and potential misappropriation of trade secrets. Hurd left the company last month, after allegations that he was involved in a number of improprieties related to a human resources consultant the company hired.

383476178_8fe0f5e767_z

Updated: Hewlett-Packard is suing its former chairman and CEO, Mark Hurd, alleging breach of contract and potential misappropriation of trade secrets. Hurd left the company under a cloud last month, after allegations that he was involved in a number of improprieties related to a human resources marketing consultant the company hired. Under an agreement with HP, Hurd left the company — taking with him a $40-million severance package — but the former HP executive was quickly snapped up by Oracle, which today announced that he will become co-president of the database company. Oracle founder and CEO Larry Ellison is a friend of Hurd’s, and was a prominent supporter of the former HP CEO after the news broke about his departure.

In the statement of claim filed today, HP says that:

Despite being paid millions of dollars in cash, stock and stock options in exchange for Hurd’s agreements to protect HP’s trade secrets and confidential information during his employment and following his departure from his positions at HP as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, HP is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Hurd has put HP’s most valuable trade secrets and confidential information in peril.

Hurd accepted positions with Oracle Corp., a competitor of HP, yesterday as its President and as a member of its Board of Directors. In his new positions, Hurd will be in a situation in which he cannot perform his duties for Oracle without necessarily using and disclosing HP’s trade secrets and confidential information to others.

The claim quotes an independent analyst — referred to in a Computerworld column about Hurd’s appointment at HP — as saying that the former HP executive will know “which Sun accounts were being most heavily mined and which HP accounts are the most vulnerable in the large enterprise space” and that this information “could be very valuable” to the company’s competitor. Hewlett-Packard also mentions that Hurd was responsible for preparing the company’s strategic business plans, including a “highly confidential” analysis of Oracle’s competitiveness with respect to HP.

In a separate statement on the lawsuit, HP said that “Mark Hurd agreed to and signed agreements designed to protect HP’s trade secrets and confidential information [and] HP intends to enforce those agreements.” The claim itself demands that a court provide “immediate injunctive relief to protect its trade secrets and confidential information from Hurd’s threatened misappropriation.” Oracle has become even more of a competitor for HP since the database company acquired Sun Microsystems, which sells servers and related software to corporate customers, a market that Hewlett-Packard is also focused on.

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the severance package that Hurd received from HP included a confidentiality agreement that prevents him from disclosing sensitive information about the company or its business for two years. Although traditional non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California, the state does allow for lawsuits based on the disclosure of trade secrets (PDF), which appears to be the key to HP’s claim. We’ve asked Oracle for a comment on the lawsuit, and will update this post if and when the company or Mr. Hurd responds. Update: Oracle has responded with a statement from CEO Larry Ellison that says:

Oracle has long viewed HP as an important partner. By filing this vindictive lawsuit against Oracle and Mark Hurd, the HP board is acting with utter disregard for that partnership, our joint customers, and their own shareholders and employees. The HP Board is making it virtually impossible for Oracle and HP to continue to cooperate and work together in the IT marketplace.

The full statement of claim from HP is embedded below:

http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user bloomsberries

You're subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

Related stories

  1. When Mark agreed to take the job at Oracle, did he think his previous agreement with HP would be ignored? Seems kind of clueless to expect HP not to be upset. Especially after HP had given tens of millions of dollars to Mark.

    Share
  2. [...] tweaked — decided to sue Hurd and Oracle. They gave a litany of reasons, many of which were covered by Mathew yesterday. It’s no surprise that a fight this juicy is getting a lot of [...]

    Share
  3. [...] Mark Hurd — who has since joined competitor Oracle as a senior executive, a move that’s now the subject of a lawsuit between the two companies — has been moving into the storage and data-center market with a number of recent [...]

    Share
  4. [...] a telenovela, but unfortunately for watchers, the drama has been cut short only two weeks after the original suit against Hurd was announded. The statement from HP and Oracle says: HP and Oracle Corp. today reaffirmed their long-term [...]

    Share
  5. [...] of impropriety, and then just a few days later he pops up at one of your competitors and HP sues him. But now the company has a new CEO, so everything should be right as rain, no? Um, no. For some [...]

    Share
  6. [...] this problem by simply saying, “You can’t work for our competitors. Period.” Which left Hewlett-Packard having to challenge former CEO Mark Hurd’s move to Oracle based on claimed breaches of confidentiality commitments, rather than noncompete. Hard to do. [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post