<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-readers Are the Future, But Is the iPad Among Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Green</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a 7 inch iPad would be a killer ereader.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a 7 inch iPad would be a killer ereader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claudia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An iPad is too heavy and bulky to hold comfortably for any length of time, so it&#039;s not ideal for reading books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An iPad is too heavy and bulky to hold comfortably for any length of time, so it&#8217;s not ideal for reading books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like you I have a (really old) Sony reader, a Kindle (DX) and an iPad.

I&#039;m going to put the Sony and Kindle on eBay one of these days.   I use the iPad 99.9% of the time when reading. I have to admit that the Kindle was nice on the eyes, but only in the right light.   Since I read a lot at night I got a light for the Kindle but it produced a lot of glare.

I also have the B&amp;N app and am not ashamed to say that I check all 3 (Amazon, Apple and B&amp;N) for the cheapest price when buying a book.

Of course, I also shop used book stores so there is no real brand loyalty in the book space for me :-)

I also question Mr. Konrath&#039;s stats or at least the usage of said stats.   It would be more interesting to see if Amazon would publish how many of his books are delivered to iPhones, iPads and Kindles,  however the odds of that happening are probably pretty slim.  Especially if it hurts the Kindle numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you I have a (really old) Sony reader, a Kindle (DX) and an iPad.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to put the Sony and Kindle on eBay one of these days.   I use the iPad 99.9% of the time when reading. I have to admit that the Kindle was nice on the eyes, but only in the right light.   Since I read a lot at night I got a light for the Kindle but it produced a lot of glare.</p>
<p>I also have the B&amp;N app and am not ashamed to say that I check all 3 (Amazon, Apple and B&amp;N) for the cheapest price when buying a book.</p>
<p>Of course, I also shop used book stores so there is no real brand loyalty in the book space for me :-)</p>
<p>I also question Mr. Konrath&#8217;s stats or at least the usage of said stats.   It would be more interesting to see if Amazon would publish how many of his books are delivered to iPhones, iPads and Kindles,  however the odds of that happening are probably pretty slim.  Especially if it hurts the Kindle numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared weaver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes the kindle store is better, but all the Kindle books I read are on the iPad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the kindle store is better, but all the Kindle books I read are on the iPad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spidubic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spidubic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing about the iPad when I was debating getting it.Is eyestrain going to be an issue? Then I got it and found I can do all the reading I want on it and so far have not noticed any eyestrain. Then again I sit in front of a computer screen for many hours a day so maybe my eyes have adjusted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same thing about the iPad when I was debating getting it.Is eyestrain going to be an issue? Then I got it and found I can do all the reading I want on it and so far have not noticed any eyestrain. Then again I sit in front of a computer screen for many hours a day so maybe my eyes have adjusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cr0ft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cr0ft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the preference of Kindle over the iPad is hardly surprising considering the iPad is a very low resolution device. It&#039;s not the fact that it&#039;s backlit that&#039;s the problem, the problem is that it is very tiring for the eyes and brain to read that blurry screen. 

Obviously I&#039;m talking about degrees here, as the iPad screen looks fine for casual viewing, but comparing it to the Kindle or a current generation iPhone screen and especially comparing the density of pixels per inch, you get pretty low numbers for the iPad. The e-ink technology of the Kindle is worse in several ways, but crispness is not one of them, and I personally believe that is the deciding factor.

The iPad and all personal computers need screens with far higher pixel density. That brings other issues like power consumption and graphics update speed, but to read on them for prolonged periods of time, you need magazine-like resolutions or beyond to be really comfortable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the preference of Kindle over the iPad is hardly surprising considering the iPad is a very low resolution device. It&#8217;s not the fact that it&#8217;s backlit that&#8217;s the problem, the problem is that it is very tiring for the eyes and brain to read that blurry screen. </p>
<p>Obviously I&#8217;m talking about degrees here, as the iPad screen looks fine for casual viewing, but comparing it to the Kindle or a current generation iPhone screen and especially comparing the density of pixels per inch, you get pretty low numbers for the iPad. The e-ink technology of the Kindle is worse in several ways, but crispness is not one of them, and I personally believe that is the deciding factor.</p>
<p>The iPad and all personal computers need screens with far higher pixel density. That brings other issues like power consumption and graphics update speed, but to read on them for prolonged periods of time, you need magazine-like resolutions or beyond to be really comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over here in Australia, we can&#039;t yet buy books from the ibookstore. So I buys books from Amazon to read on my iPad and iPhones. Kindle books sale is not a good metric to measure the popularity of the kindle hardware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over here in Australia, we can&#8217;t yet buy books from the ibookstore. So I buys books from Amazon to read on my iPad and iPhones. Kindle books sale is not a good metric to measure the popularity of the kindle hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been reading e-books on my iPad for 3 months now, and it&#039;s simply fine. I don&#039;t have any other ebook reader, and don&#039;t feel compelled toget one. I read 1-2 hrs every night, and find it no strain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading e-books on my iPad for 3 months now, and it&#8217;s simply fine. I don&#8217;t have any other ebook reader, and don&#8217;t feel compelled toget one. I read 1-2 hrs every night, and find it no strain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spidubic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spidubic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved my Kindle 2 and when I moved to the iPad my wife took ownership of the Kindle 2 and loves it even more. For me the iPad works best because I can read books, magazines, and comics all on one device. Plus surf the web and do many other things like play games or listen to music. All on one device. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved my Kindle 2 and when I moved to the iPad my wife took ownership of the Kindle 2 and loves it even more. For me the iPad works best because I can read books, magazines, and comics all on one device. Plus surf the web and do many other things like play games or listen to music. All on one device. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/27/e-readers-are-the-future-but-is-the-ipad-among-them/#comment-390290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=50571#comment-390290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that the refresh rate is improved over the original, but still find that &quot;pregnant pause&quot; to be a distraction.  I suppose I could get used to it after time, but a device I use for reading, while reading, should lower my blood pressure, not aggravate me.  

I have never quite understood the e-ink debates.  Like many of us, I spend almost all day in front of a monitor.  After doing that for so many years, I don&#039;t find that reading on a device such as an iPad, despite it being backlit, as anything but &quot;natural&quot;.  If you can spend 8-10 hours a day in front of a backlit computer screen, I don&#039;t understand how reading 100 pages or more on a backlit device is tiring.  

I&#039;m an attorney and use the iPad to read everything from comics to magazines to novels to pdfs of contracts and pleadings.  I prefer the backlit (albeit set to less then sunburn brightness) and find it much more natural and relaxing then reading an e-ink device.  I agree with the other comments - while iBooks has a very nice UI, the Kindle app, with all of the available content really shines on the iPhone.  I&#039;m still annoyed that it took ereader so long to make its app iPad compatible since I had such a large library of books - as a result I buy almost all my new content from Amazon.

Oh, and don&#039;t get me started as to why I need 3 or 4 different e-readers to read all my books...unless I feel like using 3rd party programs to convert my books and then reload and hope they format correctly...sheesh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the refresh rate is improved over the original, but still find that &#8220;pregnant pause&#8221; to be a distraction.  I suppose I could get used to it after time, but a device I use for reading, while reading, should lower my blood pressure, not aggravate me.  </p>
<p>I have never quite understood the e-ink debates.  Like many of us, I spend almost all day in front of a monitor.  After doing that for so many years, I don&#8217;t find that reading on a device such as an iPad, despite it being backlit, as anything but &#8220;natural&#8221;.  If you can spend 8-10 hours a day in front of a backlit computer screen, I don&#8217;t understand how reading 100 pages or more on a backlit device is tiring.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m an attorney and use the iPad to read everything from comics to magazines to novels to pdfs of contracts and pleadings.  I prefer the backlit (albeit set to less then sunburn brightness) and find it much more natural and relaxing then reading an e-ink device.  I agree with the other comments &#8211; while iBooks has a very nice UI, the Kindle app, with all of the available content really shines on the iPhone.  I&#8217;m still annoyed that it took ereader so long to make its app iPad compatible since I had such a large library of books &#8211; as a result I buy almost all my new content from Amazon.</p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t get me started as to why I need 3 or 4 different e-readers to read all my books&#8230;unless I feel like using 3rd party programs to convert my books and then reload and hope they format correctly&#8230;sheesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
