<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Trying Hard &#8212; Maybe Too Hard &#8212; to Stay Relevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Cuts Staff by 37%, Loses Senior Executive: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-373782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digg Cuts Staff by 37%, Loses Senior Executive: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-373782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] launched a new version of the site just a week before Williams was hired, after more than a year of design and testing. But the launch [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched a new version of the site just a week before Williams was hired, after more than a year of design and testing. But the launch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Digg Apologize Its Way Back to Popularity?: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-295137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Digg Apologize Its Way Back to Popularity?: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-295137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to recap, Digg launched the new version of the site in late August. Almost immediately, there was a backlash from long-time Digg users. Many were concerned that too [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to recap, Digg launched the new version of the site in late August. Almost immediately, there was a backlash from long-time Digg users. Many were concerned that too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Backlash Reinforces the Risks of Social Media &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-273299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digg Backlash Reinforces the Risks of Social Media &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-273299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of revisions and feature additions over the years, but nothing approaching the magnitude of the relaunch that took place recently, a comprehensive redesign and restructuring that had been in the works for over a year. The launch [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of revisions and feature additions over the years, but nothing approaching the magnitude of the relaunch that took place recently, a comprehensive redesign and restructuring that had been in the works for over a year. The launch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Exec: Sorry About the Bugs, But We&#8217;re Glad You Care! &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-268341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digg Exec: Sorry About the Bugs, But We&#8217;re Glad You Care! &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-268341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]    Digg has had a hectic week. The company&#8217;s long-awaited relaunch didn&#8217;t exactly go as planned &#8212; it was fraught with technical problems and poorly [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Digg has had a hectic week. The company&#8217;s long-awaited relaunch didn&#8217;t exactly go as planned &#8212; it was fraught with technical problems and poorly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Digg CEO Must Grab the Reins and&#160;Go</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-266890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Digg CEO Must Grab the Reins and&#160;Go]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-266890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and skilled at building teams. Those talents could certainly be useful for Digg, which launched a redesign last week that had been over a year in the making, and had been interrupted by layoffs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and skilled at building teams. Those talents could certainly be useful for Digg, which launched a redesign last week that had been over a year in the making, and had been interrupted by layoffs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Users Are Revolting &#8212; But Literally This&#160;Time</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-266285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digg Users Are Revolting &#8212; But Literally This&#160;Time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-266285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a problem-plagued relaunch of the link-sharing site last week, some Digg users seem to have taken matters into their own [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a problem-plagued relaunch of the link-sharing site last week, some Digg users seem to have taken matters into their own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Redesign Met With a Thumbs Down</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-263588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digg Redesign Met With a Thumbs Down]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-263588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] new version of Digg launched yesterday after more than a year of development and was either unreachable or unstable for much of the day. It doesn&#8217;t seem to be winning many fans, at least not among the link-sharing site&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new version of Digg launched yesterday after more than a year of development and was either unreachable or unstable for much of the day. It doesn&#8217;t seem to be winning many fans, at least not among the link-sharing site&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-263587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-263587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that you see Kevin as having lost interest in the company, Gildmeister -- and yet he is the CEO. Thanks for the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you see Kevin as having lost interest in the company, Gildmeister &#8212; and yet he is the CEO. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-263586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-263586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good point, Jon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/25/digg-redesign/#comment-263585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=139861#comment-263585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Ric -- a number of other Digg users seem to feel the same, as I mentioned in this post: http://gigaom.com/2010/08/26/digg-redesign-met-with-a-thumbs-down/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ric &#8212; a number of other Digg users seem to feel the same, as I mentioned in this post: <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/08/26/digg-redesign-met-with-a-thumbs-down/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2010/08/26/digg-redesign-met-with-a-thumbs-down/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
