<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now HP Wants 3PAR, Will Pay $1.6 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/08/23/and-now-hp-wants-3par-will-pay-1-6-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/23/and-now-hp-wants-3par-will-pay-1-6-billion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3PAR Says Yes To Dell, No to HP&#8230; Again</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/23/and-now-hp-wants-3par-will-pay-1-6-billion/#comment-302941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3PAR Says Yes To Dell, No to HP&#8230; Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=375#comment-302941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] makes more sense for HP to acquire the company. Dell first offered $1.15 billion for 3PAR and later HP countered with a $1.6 billion offer. its  And now Dell is offering $1.6 billion net of 3PAR’s [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes more sense for HP to acquire the company. Dell first offered $1.15 billion for 3PAR and later HP countered with a $1.6 billion offer. its  And now Dell is offering $1.6 billion net of 3PAR’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why HP&#8217;s 3PAR Bid Makes Sense</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/23/and-now-hp-wants-3par-will-pay-1-6-billion/#comment-302940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why HP&#8217;s 3PAR Bid Makes Sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=375#comment-302940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] (See The Simple Reason Dell Bought 3PAR.) Yesterday, HP showed that even elephants can dance and jumped into the fray with a $1.6 billion bid, about one-third higher than Dell’s original $1.15 billion [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (See The Simple Reason Dell Bought 3PAR.) Yesterday, HP showed that even elephants can dance and jumped into the fray with a $1.6 billion bid, about one-third higher than Dell’s original $1.15 billion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush Agarwal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/23/and-now-hp-wants-3par-will-pay-1-6-billion/#comment-302939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piyush Agarwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cloud.gigaom.com/?p=375#comment-302939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I am not sure I understand these markets well, but why is BRCD not a player in this? Isn&#039;t BRCD supposed to be strong in FC storage market? Would it be a fallback option for the loser (don&#039;t think Dell would make that big a acquisition though). How about IBM?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure I understand these markets well, but why is BRCD not a player in this? Isn&#8217;t BRCD supposed to be strong in FC storage market? Would it be a fallback option for the loser (don&#8217;t think Dell would make that big a acquisition though). How about IBM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
