<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Netflix Pay Too Much for Epix Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a smart move by Netflix, taking the leader role in a category where content is flying freely and available virtually everywhere is priceless. This was not an investment based on traditional distribution business models, this was an investment in posturing and dominating a very crowded space. I&#039;m sure their intent was to raise the bar and make it more difficult for competitors to compete while their cost-per-leads go down and conversion rates go up. Congratulations to Epix HD and Netflix - both winners!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a smart move by Netflix, taking the leader role in a category where content is flying freely and available virtually everywhere is priceless. This was not an investment based on traditional distribution business models, this was an investment in posturing and dominating a very crowded space. I&#8217;m sure their intent was to raise the bar and make it more difficult for competitors to compete while their cost-per-leads go down and conversion rates go up. Congratulations to Epix HD and Netflix &#8211; both winners!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBO Going to the iPad, But Not to Netflix</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HBO Going to the iPad, But Not to Netflix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] And Netflix has shown that it is willing to right big checks for streaming content, reportedly paying up to $1 billion over five years over its deal with Epix. Netflix might not have the same heft as some of the big [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And Netflix has shown that it is willing to right big checks for streaming content, reportedly paying up to $1 billion over five years over its deal with Epix. Netflix might not have the same heft as some of the big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Poll: What&#8217;s Next For Netflix?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekend Poll: What&#8217;s Next For Netflix?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Weekend Poll: What&#8217;s Next For&#160;Netflix?   By Janko Roettgers Aug. 15, 2010, 12:01am  No Comments     &#160; &#160;0   This week&#8217;s news that Netflix has struck a licensing agreement with pay TV network Epix has gotten praise from Netflix customers who are now looking forward to streaming movies like Star Trek and Iron Man, but also worried some analysts who think that Netflix paid too much for Epix. [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weekend Poll: What&#8217;s Next For&nbsp;Netflix?   By Janko Roettgers Aug. 15, 2010, 12:01am  No Comments     &nbsp; &nbsp;0   This week&#8217;s news that Netflix has struck a licensing agreement with pay TV network Epix has gotten praise from Netflix customers who are now looking forward to streaming movies like Star Trek and Iron Man, but also worried some analysts who think that Netflix paid too much for Epix. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jones</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without looking at the financials and the agreement struck with Epix in detail it is difficult to make a fair assessment of whether Epix overpaid.  There may have been a premium paid on the content, however, the deal provides Netflix with a deep library of content for online streaming which will support growth in subscriber adoption and may even reduce churn.  Furthermore, this is a critical juncture for the transition from DVD to streaming, and Netflix is making a very intelligent and calculated bet that it needs to secure as much content now to support acquiring a dominant lead in the online movie streaming space.  In my opinion, the strategic value of the deal far exceeds the premium that may have been paid.  Smart move.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without looking at the financials and the agreement struck with Epix in detail it is difficult to make a fair assessment of whether Epix overpaid.  There may have been a premium paid on the content, however, the deal provides Netflix with a deep library of content for online streaming which will support growth in subscriber adoption and may even reduce churn.  Furthermore, this is a critical juncture for the transition from DVD to streaming, and Netflix is making a very intelligent and calculated bet that it needs to secure as much content now to support acquiring a dominant lead in the online movie streaming space.  In my opinion, the strategic value of the deal far exceeds the premium that may have been paid.  Smart move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpacking the Netflix-EPIX deal &#124; Concurrent Media</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unpacking the Netflix-EPIX deal &#124; Concurrent Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Did Netflix Pay Too Much for EPIX Content? [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did Netflix Pay Too Much for EPIX Content? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some points to ponder for Weight loss Springfield MO measures &#124; Secrets For Losing Weight</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some points to ponder for Weight loss Springfield MO measures &#124; Secrets For Losing Weight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Did Netflix Pay Too Much for Epix Content? [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did Netflix Pay Too Much for Epix Content? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modelmotion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modelmotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also typo: It already significant =

It already significantly
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also typo: It already significant =</p>
<p>It already significantly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modelmotion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/08/10/did-netflix-pay-too-much-for-epix-content/#comment-487446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modelmotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=54203#comment-487446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to factor in the degree of corruption in the Wall Street analyst business.  They are in the business of producing reports that allow their brokers to recommend buy/sell actions.

This seems like a good move by Netflix.  They need to move fast to consolidate their market position.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to factor in the degree of corruption in the Wall Street analyst business.  They are in the business of producing reports that allow their brokers to recommend buy/sell actions.</p>
<p>This seems like a good move by Netflix.  They need to move fast to consolidate their market position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
