<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Gives Image Search an Overdue Refresh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 06:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aep528</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aep528]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree. It just seems very odd that the author of the article didn&#039;t mention Bing at all.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It just seems very odd that the author of the article didn&#8217;t mention Bing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Am I the only person that find data like website URL and dimensions of the photo as important as the picture itself and thus having to wait on the crappy hover for a second to see those details find that this less useful?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person that find data like website URL and dimensions of the photo as important as the picture itself and thus having to wait on the crappy hover for a second to see those details find that this less useful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joesixgig</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joesixgig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The infinite scroll mode that Bing offered is exactly why I had been using it as the default. You know how the saying goes: &quot;If it ain&#039;t broke or there ain&#039;t no competition, don&#039;t fix it&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The infinite scroll mode that Bing offered is exactly why I had been using it as the default. You know how the saying goes: &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t broke or there ain&#8217;t no competition, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Finally infinite scroll, well this will eat more bandwith.
Google images search is more accurate due to google image labeler game ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://michkhoo.blogspot.com/2009/08/human-labor-games-comprison-gwap-google.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally infinite scroll, well this will eat more bandwith.<br />
Google images search is more accurate due to google image labeler game ;-)</p>
<p><a href="http://michkhoo.blogspot.com/2009/08/human-labor-games-comprison-gwap-google.html" rel="nofollow">http://michkhoo.blogspot.com/2009/08/human-labor-games-comprison-gwap-google.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodStuff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoodStuff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I like this new format.  It allows me to browse more pictures faster.  If I like a picture than I can hover over it to find out if it will fit my needs...or do a similar image search to find more like it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either way, once you get used to it, it definitely is quicker!  It may be like it&#039;s copying Bing, but a good idea is a good idea...so there.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this new format.  It allows me to browse more pictures faster.  If I like a picture than I can hover over it to find out if it will fit my needs&#8230;or do a similar image search to find more like it.</p>
<p>Either way, once you get used to it, it definitely is quicker!  It may be like it&#8217;s copying Bing, but a good idea is a good idea&#8230;so there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aep528</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/20/google-gives-image-search-an-overdue-refresh/#comment-258259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aep528]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=133789#comment-258259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So, this update makes Google Image Search results look more like Bing?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google didn&#039;t change the results page because there wasn&#039;t any reason to until they realized Bing isn&#039;t going away.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this update makes Google Image Search results look more like Bing?</p>
<p>Google didn&#8217;t change the results page because there wasn&#8217;t any reason to until they realized Bing isn&#8217;t going away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
