<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When it Comes to Broadband, UK Still A Laggard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/07/16/uk-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/16/uk-broadband/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:30:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dannystaple</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/16/uk-broadband/#comment-257875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dannystaple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=133247#comment-257875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If you go to most urban areas, then most people, even those on benefits, have access to relatively fast broadband (2mb or above) at home - although because much of it is based on BT&#039;s old copper network, it still tails off as you get further from an exchange. The digital cable network alternatives only came to my area (west of London) in the last 4/5 years. Those not connected tend to be either a) In rural areas - hard to  bring any new wiring to, b) In the other 50&#039;s mark - a group only just catching up or c) Just plain not interested - there are still plenty just getting the idea.
3G phone networks may start to bridge the gap for the rural areas.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to most urban areas, then most people, even those on benefits, have access to relatively fast broadband (2mb or above) at home &#8211; although because much of it is based on BT&#8217;s old copper network, it still tails off as you get further from an exchange. The digital cable network alternatives only came to my area (west of London) in the last 4/5 years. Those not connected tend to be either a) In rural areas &#8211; hard to  bring any new wiring to, b) In the other 50&#8242;s mark &#8211; a group only just catching up or c) Just plain not interested &#8211; there are still plenty just getting the idea.<br />
3G phone networks may start to bridge the gap for the rural areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/07/16/uk-broadband/#comment-257874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Himanshu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=133247#comment-257874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;i hope India also comes with something like this. If not the speed at least make service better in order to have decent experience when surfing the basic 256kbps broadband connections&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope India also comes with something like this. If not the speed at least make service better in order to have decent experience when surfing the basic 256kbps broadband connections</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
