http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/ Fri, 24 May 2013 17:29:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486923 Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:20:41 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486923 But if it was thrown out of court, isn’t that pretty much the definition of a frivolous lawsuit? If so, that’s pretty much what loser-pay was created for.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486922 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:13:33 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486922 umh…yeah probably. But Im still confuse, probably due to the difference of our justice’s systems. That means tomorrow I will go straight on justice dot gov or something like that just to clarify :)

]]> http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486921 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:30:11 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486921 Maybe it has something to do with the case being thrown out instead of actually tried and won?

]]> http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486920 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:25:19 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486920 Don’t forget — THE LAWSUIT AIN’T OVER YET! We are now in the appeals stage folks — so, the clock keeps running on the time-sheets of those value-creating lawyers (one 15 minute increment at a time ….)

]]> http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486919 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:14:11 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486919 I was wondering exactly the same thing. I’m from Italy so maybe I don’t know exactly how the justice in US technically works but don’t loser pays counterpart’s fees as asked by Scott?

]]> http://gigaom.com/2010/07/15/googles-viacom-suit-legal-fees-100-million/#comment-486918 Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:28:56 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=52795#comment-486918 Why doesn’t the loser pay the other’s legal fees?

]]>