<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#039;s Get Technical: New Broadband Technical Advisory Group Formed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISPs to FCC: Get in Line or Else: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-521867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ISPs to FCC: Get in Line or Else: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-521867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Speaking at the Brookings Institution last week, Cohen also championed the newly established Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group, an industry forum of engineers and technologists, calling it an innovative group that can solve [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking at the Brookings Institution last week, Cohen also championed the newly established Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group, an industry forum of engineers and technologists, calling it an innovative group that can solve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-254182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-254182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Title II isn&#039;t going to fly, and it&#039;s a kludge at best. Congress has to lay out America&#039;s Internet regulatory policy, and they haven&#039;t reallybgot a good idea of where to start. Their last stab, the Communications Act of 1996, doesn&#039;t mention DSL, Cable Modem, FTTH, or mobile broadband. They&#039;ve got a lot of catching up to do.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Title II isn&#8217;t going to fly, and it&#8217;s a kludge at best. Congress has to lay out America&#8217;s Internet regulatory policy, and they haven&#8217;t reallybgot a good idea of where to start. Their last stab, the Communications Act of 1996, doesn&#8217;t mention DSL, Cable Modem, FTTH, or mobile broadband. They&#8217;ve got a lot of catching up to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon B. Nuez Jr.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-254181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon B. Nuez Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-254181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If TAG is successful in self-regulation combined with reasonable regulatory framework then is Title II or the &quot;third way&quot; necessary?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If TAG is successful in self-regulation combined with reasonable regulatory framework then is Title II or the &#8220;third way&#8221; necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-254180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-254180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The TAG is the result of two years worth of discussion in DC on Internet industry self-regulation. All new technologies with a reasonable regulatory framework start with self-regulation and then move to government regulation once their parameters are well-understood. The alternative is to try and shoe-horn them into whatever legacy framework seems handy, like Title II.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TAG is the result of two years worth of discussion in DC on Internet industry self-regulation. All new technologies with a reasonable regulatory framework start with self-regulation and then move to government regulation once their parameters are well-understood. The alternative is to try and shoe-horn them into whatever legacy framework seems handy, like Title II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon B Nuez Jr.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-254179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon B Nuez Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-254179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I find it curious that perhaps the real intent of TAG is self-regulation. If that is the case then this might be a brilliant chess move.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I recently wrote an article on crowd-sourcing to solve problems. TAG has that same feel -- is an impressive and eclectic bunch: AT&amp;T, Cisco, Comcast, EchoStar, Time Warner Cable and with Professor Hatfiled leading this charge. It feels as if I am looking at the United Nations of the broadband industry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition to the companies mentioned TAG may also invite – academics, professionals, policy makers and engineers. This is simply a massive collection of problem solvers -- working on best practices, advise on technical issues, resolve disputes over network management and work with policy makers.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it curious that perhaps the real intent of TAG is self-regulation. If that is the case then this might be a brilliant chess move.</p>
<p>I recently wrote an article on crowd-sourcing to solve problems. TAG has that same feel &#8212; is an impressive and eclectic bunch: AT&amp;T, Cisco, Comcast, EchoStar, Time Warner Cable and with Professor Hatfiled leading this charge. It feels as if I am looking at the United Nations of the broadband industry.</p>
<p>In addition to the companies mentioned TAG may also invite – academics, professionals, policy makers and engineers. This is simply a massive collection of problem solvers &#8212; working on best practices, advise on technical issues, resolve disputes over network management and work with policy makers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband internet &#187; Archive &#187; Private Sector Committee Will Look at Net Neutrality Issues &#8211; PC World</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/09/lets-get-technical-new-broadband-technical-advisory-group-formed/#comment-254178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadband internet &#187; Archive &#187; Private Sector Committee Will Look at Net Neutrality Issues &#8211; PC World]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125486#comment-254178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] hostilitiesCNET (blog)  Post Tech: Telecom, tech giants seek voluntary net neutralityWashington PostGigaOm (blog)&#160;-Ars Technica&#160;-BusinessWeekall 93 news articles&#160;&#187;      No Comments so far  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hostilitiesCNET (blog)  Post Tech: Telecom, tech giants seek voluntary net neutralityWashington PostGigaOm (blog)&nbsp;-Ars Technica&nbsp;-BusinessWeekall 93 news articles&nbsp;&raquo;      No Comments so far  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
