<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Jobs Survives Gizmodo, But Not MiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple to Live Stream Press Event for First Time</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-267009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple to Live Stream Press Event for First Time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-267009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a reliable network connection to do a live demo of the iPhone 4 at its launch in June, which he attributed at the time to bloggers using MiFi and similar devices to run their own Wi-Fi [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a reliable network connection to do a live demo of the iPhone 4 at its launch in June, which he attributed at the time to bloggers using MiFi and similar devices to run their own Wi-Fi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @timbehrsin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@timbehrsin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Seconding the motion.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconding the motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a delicious irony here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apple would not be anywhere near the innovative company it is today without open standards, open software, and publicly-owned and regulated networks. Yet, they are the prime proponent in pushing the censorship-laden App Store, patent-minefield codecs like H.264, &quot;standard&quot; HTML5 demos written to only work in Safari, and ridiculous corporate secrecy policies that coerce blue-collar employees on the other side of the earth to commit suicide (just to name a few recent transgressions). For a company supposedly innovative and good at bringing people what they want, they have quite a knack for preventing innovation and denying people who want specific freedoms from having them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, presumably, their &quot;partner&quot; AT&amp;T said no to enabling video chat on their 3G network—nevermind that customers, now paying for each byte with AT&amp;T&#039;s new plans, should have the freedom to choose what those bytes are used for. Apple: how does it feel when someone says no to you and keeps you from innovating?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a delicious irony here.</p>
<p>Apple would not be anywhere near the innovative company it is today without open standards, open software, and publicly-owned and regulated networks. Yet, they are the prime proponent in pushing the censorship-laden App Store, patent-minefield codecs like H.264, &#8220;standard&#8221; HTML5 demos written to only work in Safari, and ridiculous corporate secrecy policies that coerce blue-collar employees on the other side of the earth to commit suicide (just to name a few recent transgressions). For a company supposedly innovative and good at bringing people what they want, they have quite a knack for preventing innovation and denying people who want specific freedoms from having them.</p>
<p>So, presumably, their &#8220;partner&#8221; AT&#038;T said no to enabling video chat on their 3G network—nevermind that customers, now paying for each byte with AT&#038;T&#8217;s new plans, should have the freedom to choose what those bytes are used for. Apple: how does it feel when someone says no to you and keeps you from innovating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I&#8217;m Waiting for Google&#8217;s Android Before Choosing Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4 &#124; Stocks and Sectors</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why I&#8217;m Waiting for Google&#8217;s Android Before Choosing Apple&#8217;s iPhone 4 &#124; Stocks and Sectors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] as he has in the past. But to boot, Steve&#8217;s normally flawless presentation suffered from WiFi trouble. Liz Gannes of GigaOm, speaking on behalf of the many iPhone owners frustrated by AT&amp;T&#8217;s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as he has in the past. But to boot, Steve&#8217;s normally flawless presentation suffered from WiFi trouble. Liz Gannes of GigaOm, speaking on behalf of the many iPhone owners frustrated by AT&#038;T&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;Assuming the iPhone 4 has 5GHz available....&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sadly, it doesn&#039;t. Even though it supports 802.11n, it&#039;s not dual-band and works on 2.4 GHz only.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Assuming the iPhone 4 has 5GHz available&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, it doesn&#8217;t. Even though it supports 802.11n, it&#8217;s not dual-band and works on 2.4 GHz only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Puchol</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Puchol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The real question for me is, why didn&#039;t Apple provide networks on different frequencies for media and demos? The MiFi interference problem is real, but in any event, if Apple would place a base station right in the table where Steve was doing the demo, its SNR would have been above what the iPhones were getting from the 570 other base stations out there, thus giving him a decent amount of bandwidth to perform the demo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Assuming the iPhone 4 has 5GHz available, Apple could have provided an encrypted network on 2.4GHz for the media &amp; attendees, with visible SSID, and have an encrypted 5GHz network with hidden SSID and broadcast turned off just for demo devices. All three MiFi devices available today use 802.11b/g at 2.4GHz, so the interference caused by them on the 5GHz band was close to zero.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question for me is, why didn&#8217;t Apple provide networks on different frequencies for media and demos? The MiFi interference problem is real, but in any event, if Apple would place a base station right in the table where Steve was doing the demo, its SNR would have been above what the iPhones were getting from the 570 other base stations out there, thus giving him a decent amount of bandwidth to perform the demo.</p>
<p>Assuming the iPhone 4 has 5GHz available, Apple could have provided an encrypted network on 2.4GHz for the media &amp; attendees, with visible SSID, and have an encrypted 5GHz network with hidden SSID and broadcast turned off just for demo devices. All three MiFi devices available today use 802.11b/g at 2.4GHz, so the interference caused by them on the 5GHz band was close to zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OmegaDelta &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OmegaDelta &#187; Blog Archive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Packetguy on http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Packetguy on <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Hits: iPhone Edition 06.08.2010 &#171; Joosk, Info on the Wireless Industry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quick Hits: iPhone Edition 06.08.2010 &#171; Joosk, Info on the Wireless Industry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] &#187;&#160; How bloggers&#8217; own WiFi networks slowed down Steve Jobs&#8217; demo. [GigaOm] [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#187;&nbsp; How bloggers&#8217; own WiFi networks slowed down Steve Jobs&#8217; demo. [GigaOm] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts &#8212; WordPress.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...]  Steve Jobs Survives Gizmodo, But Not MiFi Apple (s AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs takes tremendous pride in his public performances, and it pays off. His product [...] [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Steve Jobs Survives Gizmodo, But Not MiFi Apple (s AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs takes tremendous pride in his public performances, and it pays off. His product [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ramsaran</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/06/07/steve-jobs-survives-gizmodo-but-not-mifi/#comment-253925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Ramsaran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=125030#comment-253925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I fail to see how this is related to the additional &quot;570 separate Wi-Fi base stations&quot; there could potentially be 5,000 Wi-Fi base stations however Apple in all their wisdom failed to test this before the Keynote and should have thought about this before hand. Plus the Apple team should have their own closed wi-fi network system just for this purpose, duh!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how this is related to the additional &#8220;570 separate Wi-Fi base stations&#8221; there could potentially be 5,000 Wi-Fi base stations however Apple in all their wisdom failed to test this before the Keynote and should have thought about this before hand. Plus the Apple team should have their own closed wi-fi network system just for this purpose, duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
