<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace Oversimplifies Privacy to Get Attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/05/17/myspace-oversimplifies-privacy-to-get-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/17/myspace-oversimplifies-privacy-to-get-attention/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook and Privacy, a David and Goliath Moment? &#124; Bloggity Blog-Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/17/myspace-oversimplifies-privacy-to-get-attention/#comment-251623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook and Privacy, a David and Goliath Moment? &#124; Bloggity Blog-Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 18:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=120640#comment-251623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] right now, in what could be their weakest moment, by attacking the privacy issue.  In fact, MySpace is already trying, but we all know that ship has [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right now, in what could be their weakest moment, by attacking the privacy issue.  In fact, MySpace is already trying, but we all know that ship has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/17/myspace-oversimplifies-privacy-to-get-attention/#comment-251622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[google.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=120640#comment-251622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] only&#8221; and is pre-announcing new simplified privacy options that are probably too simplistic. Link &#8211; Trackbacks&#013;&#013;View full post on Topsy &#8211; Top 100  Maybe you want to go [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only&#8221; and is pre-announcing new simplified privacy options that are probably too simplistic. Link &#8211; Trackbacks&#013;&#013;View full post on Topsy &#8211; Top 100  Maybe you want to go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strodtbeck</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/17/myspace-oversimplifies-privacy-to-get-attention/#comment-251621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strodtbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=120640#comment-251621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;These sites really need to have a dual account setup. Where you would have one account with essentially two profiles, a private one and a public one. That way you could simply ignore the settings in general.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sites really need to have a dual account setup. Where you would have one account with essentially two profiles, a private one and a public one. That way you could simply ignore the settings in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
