11 Comments

Summary:

The current status of the International Association for Web Television and the potential relationship between the not-yet-officially-a-nonprofit organization and the for-profit Streamy Awards dominated Wednesday night’s town hall meeting.

IAWTV-logo

UPDATED: Hey, what happened on America’s Next Top Model last night? ‘Cause I missed it. That’s because Wednesday evening, I joined approximately 85 IAWTV members as they gathered at the WGA West headquarters in Los Angeles for a “town hall” meeting to discuss the organization’s future, especially as it might affect the future of the Streamy Awards following this year’s disastrous ceremony.

While about half of the IAWTV Board of Directors were present, including Marc Hustvedt, George Ruiz, Michael Wayne, Brady Brim-Deforest and Drew Baldwin, it was Wayne, acting as Chairman of the Board, who took the lead in speaking for them. Meanwhile, Executive Director Elisabeth Flack — who is also the WGAW new media contracts administrator — will handle member suggestions and infrastructure issues moving forward.

One of the big revelations to come out of the meeting was the fact that the IAWTV simply hasn’t come together as an organization yet. For one thing, while the IAWTV is working with a lawyer to file for non-profit status, it has not yet done so and is thus not officially a non-profit organization. UPDATE: According to Brim-Deforest via email, “The IAWTV is a Nonprofit corporation registered with the State of California. While we have not yet filed our application for federal tax-exempt status (the IRS gives non-profit organizations up to 24 months to file) the application is currently in progress.”

In addition, the $90 membership fee collected from each member over the past year is currently “sitting in a Paypal account,” according to Wayne, and not “one penny” has been spent. A member of the audience joked about whether or not it was earning interest, which Wayne said it was not — but given that there are over 200 IAWTV members, that means at least $18,000 should have been collected and is now sitting around unused.

This all came out during a relatively civil but passionate discussion about both past events and the organization’s future, in which only a few moments hit a truly negative tone. The proceedings might have had more focus with a set agenda, but a number of issues that were raised as a result of the free-form format, included some interesting revelations.

Brim-Deforest and Wayne acknowledged that while there had been “some drama” over the last few weeks with regards to the Streamys’ future — externalized by the Tubefilter-backed Rebuild the Trust initiative that accused unnamed board members of a “hostile takeover” effort — they had moved past it and were now committed to working together to come up with a solution. When asked, Brim-Deforest said that the Rebuild the Trust website would be taken down. It’s still online as I write this, but that may change soon. UPDATE: Rebuildthetrust.org now redirects to IAWTV.org.

While an effort was made to avoid rehashing the problems with this year’s Streamys, the awards show’s relationship to the IAWTV was a chief concern of the evening. While there is currently no legal relationship between the two organizations and Tubefilter remains the outright owner of the show, the front page of the IAWTV site at this moment reads:

The principle mandate of the organization is to oversee the selection of nominees and winners for the annual Streamy Awards™ which recognize outstanding achievement in episodic shows produced originally for broadband distribution.

The consensus of the room seemed to be that this principle mandate is a core problem; because a non-profit group was created to support a for-profit awards show — not the other way around, as is traditional — the priorities have become skewed.

Many, including Easy to Assemble creator Illeana Douglas, said that they didn’t know what the organization was supposed to stand for, to which Wayne responded that plans to revise the IAWTV mission statement were in place. A few people, including EQAL CEO Miles Beckett, even suggested that the Streamys should be ditched entirely, and that the IAWTV should instead focus on being an organization that supports the development of web content. Hustvedt said that he’d hoped the IAWTV would be an organization that could focus on industry issues like view count fraud. “That’s where I thought the Academy was going to head,” he said.

“Absolutely we need to have a vision,” Ruiz said. “We’re showing the industry that we’re growing up. But we got sidetracked by the awards show — it’s the tail wagging the dog. The fact we’re all talking about an awards show is ridiculous. [Ruiz's client and co-board member] Felicia Day is not on an awards show academy, I’m not on an awards show academy. I’m on a board to grow and support the industry.” Day was not present due to shooting commitments on The Guild.

What the IAWTV might be beyond “an awards show academy” lacks definition at this stage, but one benefit that got people excited was this: in theory, the IAWTV could offer grants and otherwise funnel money to the community through fundraising initiatives.

Wayne’s response to many issues brought up was to refer people to the newly established members-only forum, which was added yesterday to the IAWTV site and in theory will be a place for members to discuss these topics and suggest changes. There was also a promise that the IAWTV by-laws and an org chart would be added to the site last night — as of this morning, only the org chart (in PDF form) is currently available.

Another thing revealed last night was that the current board’s terms expire on December 3, 2010. But while five of the 11 seats are currently held by Tubefilter principles Drew Baldwin, Brady Brim-Deforest, Josh Cohen, Marc Hustvedt and Jamison Tilsner, Wayne said last night that “Even the Tubefilter guys think having five guys from one company is too much.” In addition, people such as Epic Fu host Zadi Diaz raised concerns that there wasn’t any creator representation on the board beyond Day.

The meeting concluded with Wayne and Flack announcing that on June 15 in New York and on June 17 in Los Angeles, the IAWTV board would present a proposal to the membership for what kind of relationship would exist between the Streamys and the IAWTV going forward, as well as a “road map” for the future development of the IAWTV. That plan will hopefully provide infrastructure to get the membership involved with helping the organization grow. The IAWTV membership, at least those who were present last night, might still have questions, but seems ready and eager to get involved.

Related GigaOm Pro content (subscription required): By The Numbers: Budget Analysis of a Web Series

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

You're subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Mark Gardner Thursday, May 13, 2010

    Thanks for the summary of events. I’m really looking forward to how the IAWTV will adapt from this point forward as well as seeing how I can become a member and help in any way I can. Was there any discussion about membership?

    1. There was a little talk about more transparency in regards to how members are selected, but the issue wasn’t discussed in full. I imagine that you’ve already sent in your application?

  2. Mark Gardner Thursday, May 13, 2010

    Alas not yet since our show has only been online for one year I decided to hold off a little longer. But sounds like I should just go ahead and submit. Then I can quit feeling so left out. ;-)

  3. Michelle Dunlap Thursday, May 13, 2010

    I only hope that these June meetings are open to members and non-memberes alike, or that the information discussed in it is posted on a publicly accessible part of the IAWTV site. The IAWTV currently keeps non-members who are active creators in the community in the dark. Without knowing the plans for the organization, how members are selected, and what it’s core purpose is, non-members can not make adequate judgements about whether or not joining the organization is in their interest.

    In particular, we’ve been asking to know how members are selected for over six months. The continued lack of a response only enforces the idea that there was no organized selection of members in the large enrollment push ahead of the Streamys. I highly doubt there was no organization at all in the selection of members, but the lack of a response to such a basic question is still ridiculous. Even if you’re planning to change the system in the future, let us know how everything happened so we know.

    So while I understand that they’re doing some soul-searching, they still need to engage with those of us who are active in the community and keep us in the loop as well. Not as much as members, but we’d still like to know what’s going on: minutes from meetings would be especially helpful.

    1. Actually Michelle, I don’t think the next set of meetings will be good to open up to the public…

      I think the ones after that one should hopefully be open…

      I’m not saying to not include anyone, it’s just that yesterday’s meeting was kinds of a “let’s get together, talk, and figure out what we want to do”

      I think as an academy we need to come together. How the academy wants to define itself, what it wants to do, and then we open it up to the public for discussion.

      1. Bernie,

        Not saying that the doors should be open to random people on the street. But the creative community the IAWTV affects stretches far beyond the IAWTV itself, and that means that many people who are stuck on the outside care a great deal about what is being said on the inside.

        Liz Miller and Jenni Powell have been very proactive in releasing the organization chart and by laws up to the wider community, and I’m very thankful to them for that. The IAWTV has begun doing the same on its Twitter feed, though I think a news section on its website will be even easier to disseminate information from.

        But the point is, that many of us care what the IAWTV decides to do. Even if we have no voice with which to influence the discussion, we want to at least know what’s being said. These write ups by Liz, Jenni, as well as New Mediacracy, have all helped with that. However I think that the IAWTV needs to be a bit more proactive in that sense. Those of us on the outside aren’t asking for control, just to be kept informed of what is happening in a timely manner.

  4. Mark Gardner Thursday, May 13, 2010

    Well said, Michelle. It is hard being outside the bubble. But I’ve been talking with more and more IAWTV members and I really do think that they’re doing their best and working in the best interests of the whole community. I’m convinced enough to apply as soon as I get a sponsor.

  5. IAWTV Town Hall Meeting – A Summary and Thoughts « Jenni Powell Friday, May 14, 2010

    [...] and got their thoughts down in a podcast recorded directly after the meeting. And there is the always astute observations of the lovely Liz Miller at NewTeeVee, which, honestly, are much more succinct then I am about to be, so those who want a much shorter [...]

  6. IAWTV Updates: Board Members Step Down, Streamys Future Up In the Air Friday, June 18, 2010

    [...] The IAWTV Is Figuring Out What It Wants To Be When It Grows Up Online Video [...]

  7. lonelygirl15 Creator, Epic Fu‘s Diaz Elected to IAWTV Board Wednesday, August 4, 2010

    [...] now completes the board’s quota of 11 members, who will go on to weigh in on important future issues facing the IAWTV, especially the fate of the Streamy Awards. The first board meeting has been scheduled for August [...]

  8. [...] now completes the board’s quota of 11 members, who will go on to weigh in on important future issues facing the IAWTV, especially the fate of the Streamy Awards. The first board meeting has been scheduled for August [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post