The Federal Communications Commission today released a video of Chairman Julius Genachowski attempting to explain the incredibly complicated approach to broadband regulation that the agency proposed yesterday. I tried to explain it in writing, but here’s Genachoswski’s attempt via video.
And because some of you may be bored at work — or may really care about the legal issues — The Free Press created a video that explains how the FCC found itself in this position in the first place after the Comcast ruling in early April.
And for those who don’t like policy videos, I can offer you KittehRoulette, a shining example of why no lawful Internet content should be blocked, no matter if it’s bandwidth-intensive video or silly beyond belief.
Related GigaOM Pro Content (sub req’d):
The New Net-Neutrality Debate: What’s the Best Way to Discriminate?
Stacey Higginbotham once again demonstrates her anti-ISP bias by offering no opposing point of view. Typical.
[...] issue, but explaining it in a way that doesn’t bore people can be tricky. Fortunately, GigaOM’s Stacey Higginbotham has dug up two helpful YouTube videos that lay out everything you need to [...]
GUD kitteh!
[...] service. This bill, submitted by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), proposes that instead of the fairly reasonable approach the FCC has chosen to implement — and it really is pretty reasonable — the agency would have to take several [...]