<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality Fans Rejoice: The FCC Will Reclassify Broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law and Politics of Net Neutrality: Part 2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-530640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Law and Politics of Net Neutrality: Part 2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-530640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As the D.C. Circuit enumerated and summarily dismissed the FCC’s increasing tenuous theories of jurisdiction under Section 257, 201, and 623 of the Act, it was clear that the best legal efforts would not be able to salvage ancillary jurisdiction over broadband Internet, when there was no jurisdiction in the first place upon which to find ancillary jurisdiction.  There was only one recourse for the FCC to (rightly or wrongly) reassert regulatory jurisdiction &#8212; broadband would have to be redefined under one of the regulated statutory categories of the Act. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As the D.C. Circuit enumerated and summarily dismissed the FCC’s increasing tenuous theories of jurisdiction under Section 257, 201, and 623 of the Act, it was clear that the best legal efforts would not be able to salvage ancillary jurisdiction over broadband Internet, when there was no jurisdiction in the first place upon which to find ancillary jurisdiction.  There was only one recourse for the FCC to (rightly or wrongly) reassert regulatory jurisdiction &#8212; broadband would have to be redefined under one of the regulated statutory categories of the Act. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genachowski, Man Up! And Silicon Valley, Wake Up!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genachowski, Man Up! And Silicon Valley, Wake Up!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] sued, and the results of that lawsuit kicked off the mother of all fights for the FCC: reclassification. At issue was whether the FCC could regulate broadband as an information service (GigaOM Pro sub [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sued, and the results of that lawsuit kicked off the mother of all fights for the FCC: reclassification. At issue was whether the FCC could regulate broadband as an information service (GigaOM Pro sub [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genachowski, Man Up! And Silicon Valley, Wake Up!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genachowski, Man Up! And Silicon Valley, Wake Up!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] sued, and the results of that lawsuit kicked off the mother of all fights for the FCC &#8212; reclassification. At issue was if the FCC could regulate broadband as an information service (GigaOM Pro sub [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sued, and the results of that lawsuit kicked off the mother of all fights for the FCC &#8212; reclassification. At issue was if the FCC could regulate broadband as an information service (GigaOM Pro sub [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With New Report FCC Makes a Bid for Universal Broadband</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With New Report FCC Makes a Bid for Universal Broadband]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to the FCC&#8217;s findings, and to warn the agency from using the findings to justify it&#8217;s attempts to reclassify broadband. Verizon issued a statement from Kathleen Grillo, senior vice president for federal regulatory [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the FCC&#8217;s findings, and to warn the agency from using the findings to justify it&#8217;s attempts to reclassify broadband. Verizon issued a statement from Kathleen Grillo, senior vice president for federal regulatory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up in the Air: FCC’s Wireless World Travel Tips Takes Off &#171; Apple iPhone app Soft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Up in the Air: FCC’s Wireless World Travel Tips Takes Off &#171; Apple iPhone app Soft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] we&#8217;ve covered in the past: Skype, Fring and Truphone. Regardless of where you stand on the FCC&#8217;s broadband reclassification and net neutrality challenges, you have to give the FCC a little credit with this week&#8217;s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve covered in the past: Skype, Fring and Truphone. Regardless of where you stand on the FCC&#8217;s broadband reclassification and net neutrality challenges, you have to give the FCC a little credit with this week&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up in the Air: FCC&#8217;s Wireless World Travel Tips Takes Off</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Up in the Air: FCC&#8217;s Wireless World Travel Tips Takes Off]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] we&#8217;ve covered in the past: Skype, Fring and Truphone. Regardless of where you stand on the FCC&#8217;s broadband reclassification and net neutrality challenges, you have to give the FCC a little credit with this week&#8217;s [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve covered in the past: Skype, Fring and Truphone. Regardless of where you stand on the FCC&#8217;s broadband reclassification and net neutrality challenges, you have to give the FCC a little credit with this week&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Starts Broadband Reclassification Process</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FCC Starts Broadband Reclassification Process]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Communications Commission today voted 3-2 to issue a notice of inquiry that will formally begin the process of reclassifying broadband and enabling the agency to continue its efforts to regulate network neutrality and implement [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Communications Commission today voted 3-2 to issue a notice of inquiry that will formally begin the process of reclassifying broadband and enabling the agency to continue its efforts to regulate network neutrality and implement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The idea of Network Neutrality sounds great, THINK of what this actually means beyond what &quot;appears&quot; to be more open access... Using &quot;slight of hand&quot;, this seems to do something good, but, just like everything else about this administration, more government control is always their answer. The ramifications from this move are staggering...from free speech to interstate commerce. This is very frightening and more so that so many people are just too stupid to realize it&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of Network Neutrality sounds great, THINK of what this actually means beyond what &#8220;appears&#8221; to be more open access&#8230; Using &#8220;slight of hand&#8221;, this seems to do something good, but, just like everything else about this administration, more government control is always their answer. The ramifications from this move are staggering&#8230;from free speech to interstate commerce. This is very frightening and more so that so many people are just too stupid to realize it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The impact of the &#8216;third way&#8217; on the information highway &#171; BitTorrent Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The impact of the &#8216;third way&#8217; on the information highway &#171; BitTorrent Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 06:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] week’s announcement from FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski about applying narrow regulation to the Internet was no [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week’s announcement from FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski about applying narrow regulation to the Internet was no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Net Neutrality Proposal Brings Broad Reaction - Online Marketing Daily</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/05/05/net-neutrality-fans-rejoice-the-fcc-will-reclassify-broadband/#comment-250390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FCC Net Neutrality Proposal Brings Broad Reaction - Online Marketing Daily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=118190#comment-250390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Under the headline, &#8220;Net Neutrality Fans Rejoice: The FCC Will Reclassify Broadband,&#8221; GigaOm explains: &#8220;The entire wonky issue was [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Under the headline, &#8220;Net Neutrality Fans Rejoice: The FCC Will Reclassify Broadband,&#8221; GigaOm explains: &#8220;The entire wonky issue was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
