15 Comments

Summary:

The FCC will seek to reclassify broadband as a transport service, opening up a way for the agency to enforce its network neutrality rules and implement the National Broadband Plan. Prepare for bitter fights as big ISPs try to keep the FCC from “regulating the Internet.”

The Federal Communications Commission plans to announce tomorrow that it will seek to reclassify broadband as a transport service, opening up a way for the agency to enforce network neutrality recommendations and implement some aspects of the National Broadband Plan. It will also open the way for some bitter lobbying and court fights as the big ISPs try to keep the FCC from “regulating the Internet.

A statement released by the agency this afternoon said:

The Chairman will seek to restore the status quo as it existed prior to the court decision in order to fulfill the previously stated agenda of extending broadband to all Americans, protecting consumers, ensuring fair competition, and preserving a free and open Internet.

The Chairman will outline a ‘third way’ approach between a weak Title I and a needlessly burdensome Title II approach. It would 1) apply to broadband transmission service only the small handful of Title II provisions that, prior to the Comcast decision, were widely believed to be within the Commission’s purview, and 2) would have broad up-front forbearance and meaningful boundaries to guard against regulatory overreach.

The entire wonky issue was brought to head at the beginning of April with an appeals court decision that the FCC had overstepped its authority when it censured Comcast for blocking P2P files. At the heart of the court’s decision and the entire reclassification debate, is that the FCC has more regulatory discretion on transport services, such as two-way telephone calls, than it does over information services. In a series of rulings dating back to 2002 the FCC had declared broadband service from the cable companies, DSL providers, wireless providers and even anyone offering broadband over power lines to be an information service mostly because in addition to the two-way transfer of packets, those providers also offered email, storage and other “information services.”

This “third way” will likely involve the agency reclassifying high-speed Internet service as transport, but the FCC will also exempt itself from applying certain regulations that are applied to the voice telephone network. Susan Crawford, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School who co-lead the FCC Agency Review team for the Obama-Biden transition, writes on her blog:

The FCC is carefully moving towards a “third way” approach to regulation of high-speed Internet access. Complete deregulation of this essential input no longer makes sense; heavy-handed regulation doesn’t either; the FCC plans to forbear from rate regulation but ensure that the transmission portion — but not Internet applications and content — is subject to basic rules of the road. They still have a lot of work to do to develop the factual record that will support regulatory reclassification of transmission services, but courts will likely defer to their classification if they do their job right. I have every expectation that they will.

So while the FCC’s willingness to step up and reclassify broadband is good news for those hoping that net neutrality rules will be passed, the process itself will take months, and will likely involve more than one proceeding as the FCC tries to make clear which regulations associated with transport services it won’t try to impose. I laid it all out in this GigaOM Pro story for those who need more detail. For those content to relax and hope the Commission can pull this off, settle in to watch the drama as well as the inevitable court fights that this reclassification effort will yield.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Public benefit 1, selfish interests 0 (I hope).

  2. Mike Sullivan Wednesday, May 5, 2010

    I don’t see the “statement released by the agency this afternoon” on its website. All of the other news stories I’ve seen about this attribute that statement to an unnamed senior FCC official speaking not for attribution. That’s quite different from a statement released by the FCC, which would be something attributable and official.

    We shall see what happens on Thursday.

  3. It’s really hard to know who to stand behind when your options are the U.S. government and ISPs. If it results in net neutrality, higher bandwidth speeds and lower prices, then I’ll be happy with the Feds getting involved.

  4. One side of me is pleased with this, and the other knows that the US govt screws up just about everything it touches. Hopefully they can get this one right.

  5. just sayin’ Thursday, May 6, 2010

    what if this is all a ploy to get more gov’t oversight on the intertubes and then once this happens, big brother turns evil, ..

    be careful when something seems to good to be true.

    just sayin’, …

  6. FCC Net Neutrality Proposal Brings Broad Reaction – Online Marketing Daily Thursday, May 6, 2010

    [...] Under the headline, “Net Neutrality Fans Rejoice: The FCC Will Reclassify Broadband,” GigaOm explains: “The entire wonky issue was [...]

  7. The impact of the ‘third way’ on the information highway « BitTorrent Blog Thursday, May 6, 2010

    [...] week’s announcement from FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski about applying narrow regulation to the Internet was no [...]

  8. The idea of Network Neutrality sounds great, THINK of what this actually means beyond what “appears” to be more open access… Using “slight of hand”, this seems to do something good, but, just like everything else about this administration, more government control is always their answer. The ramifications from this move are staggering…from free speech to interstate commerce. This is very frightening and more so that so many people are just too stupid to realize it

  9. FCC Starts Broadband Reclassification Process Thursday, June 17, 2010

    [...] Communications Commission today voted 3-2 to issue a notice of inquiry that will formally begin the process of reclassifying broadband and enabling the agency to continue its efforts to regulate network neutrality and implement [...]

  10. Up in the Air: FCC’s Wireless World Travel Tips Takes Off Monday, June 21, 2010

    [...] we’ve covered in the past: Skype, Fring and Truphone. Regardless of where you stand on the FCC’s broadband reclassification and net neutrality challenges, you have to give the FCC a little credit with this week’s [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post