6 Comments

Summary:

Clustrix, a Y Combinator grad from 2006, launched today with claims that it has built a transaction database with MySQL-like functionality and reliability that can scale to billions of entries. This is big stuff as scaling databases is a key bottleneck for web services today.

Clustrix, a Y Combinator graduate from 2006, launched today with the claim that it’s built a transaction database with MySQL-like functionality and reliability that can scale to billions of entries. Clustrix plans to sell its appliance (which consists of more than a terabyte of memory and its proprietary software) to web firms that don’t want to take on the complicated task of sharding their data (replicating it across multiple databases), or moving to less robust database options like Cassandra or a key value store such as what’s provided by Twitter.

This is big stuff. Indeed, Paul Mikesell — CEO of Clustrix and the former co-founder of storage system success story Isilon — said the goal is to use its appliance to solve a growing problem for companies managing large amounts of data, such as big travel, e-commerce and social websites. As the web grows more social, companies are trying to keep track of more pieces of data about users and their relationships to other users. This creates complicated and large databases that can slow down access to user information, and thus the end user experience.

We’ve written about myriad attempts to solve these data scalability problems, attempts that have spawned appliance startups and whole branches of code designed to help sites scale their data, from Hadoop to Cassandra to Twitter’s Gizzard. Mikesell said the product could replace the need for caching appliances such as those offered by Schooner or Northscale, but could also work in conjunction with them.

As for some of the open source options, new programming languages like Bloom, or cloud-based scalable databases such as Microsoft’s SQL Azure or Rackspace’s partnership with FathomDB, Mikesell is confident that the ability to replicate the functionality of a relational database at webscale without sharding or tweaking the existing code is powerful enough that customers would pay $80,000 for a 3-node machine containing the software. There are plenty of companies reluctant to trust the open-source spin-outs from companies like Twitter and Facebook.

The market is clearly there for scalable relational database products (GigaOM Pro, sub req’d), so if Clustrix can take the $18 million invested in it from Sequoia, ATA Ventures and US Venture Partners and turn it into an Isilon-like exit, more power to it.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Clustrix (YC W06) Builds the Webscale Holy Grail: A Database That Scales Monday, May 3, 2010

    [...] full post on Hacker News If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it! Tagged with: builds • [...]

  2. Clustrix выпустила масштабируемый сервер баз данных | александр.moskalyuk.name Tuesday, May 4, 2010

    [...] Clustrix на конференции Web 2.0 Expo представила миру свой новый продукт – вроде как быстро масштабируемую базу данных с [...]

  3. Facebook’s Jonathan Heiliger To Advise Clustrix : Cloud « Monday, October 11, 2010

    [...] of technical operations in a press statement. When writing about the company back in May 2010, Stacey pointed out that this clustered database system was webscale’s holy [...]

  4. Jeff Jonas Video on How Data Makes Corporations Dumb: Tech News « Monday, October 11, 2010

    [...] world.  We see him as a kindred spirit. Whether it is writing about the rise of sensor nets or webscale databases, big data is an area of focus for [...]

  5. Has anyone tried this stuff?

  6. Clustrix Gets $12M More for Scalable SQL: Cloud « Tuesday, December 14, 2010

    [...] appliance that the company claims combines NoSQL scalability with MySQL functionality. As Stacey pointed out upon the company’s launch, it sounds the Holy Grail of Internet-scale data management, but there might actually be something [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post