Intel and Nokia are attempting to gather up developer support with developer workshops touting the benefits of the MeeGo platform for handsets and netbooks. All the right pieces are there — cross-platform tools and app stores — but will developers take the bait?

The Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit, a 3-day event for open source developers and mobile partners, kicks off today. Among the various agenda topics are both a keynote and multiple workshop sessions devoted to MeeGo, the platform created when Intel’s Moblin project and Nokia’s Maemo operating system merged at February’s Mobile World Congress. With the workshop sessions, Intel and Nokia are fighting for the attention of developers, much like other platforms are, as exemplified with the Twitter and Facebook programmer events as well as Apple and its new iPhone 4.0 OS. So why might a developer be interested in MeeGo?

For starters, MeeGo offers opportunities in both the smartphone and the netbook or tablet space. There are two MeeGo user experience frameworks — one for handsets and one for netbooks — but applications designed for MeeGo aren’t constrained to one device type. While smartphone software could require visual adjustment to run on the larger display of a netbook, for example, the software itself is created with Qt, a cross-platform development tool. Think of Qt, which Nokia purchased in January 2008, like Java’s write-once, run-anywhere approach. Nokia’s VP of MeeGo devices, Ari Jaaksi, explains the benefits best in a Linux.com interview from earlier this morning:

“Qt is a cross-platform application and UI framework used by hundreds of thousands of developers worldwide looking to create amazing user experiences on Windows, Mac, Linux, Windows Mobile, Symbian and Maemo devices. Qt will be the primary application framework for MeeGo and both Intel and Nokia are committing their investment in it.  For developers interested in MeeGo, Qt helps increase the scope for their applications and services across multiple platforms, all using consistent application APIs.”

Two more carrots dangling in front of potential MeeGo developers are the Linux tie-ins and application stores. Intel’s documentation from its Beijing Developer Forum, also in progress now, points out MeeGo support for potentially thousands of native Linux software titles. And those titles targeted for MeeGo, as well as those built with the Qt framework will be available through two partner storefronts. The Intel App Up store offers software for netbooks, while Nokia is leveraging its Ovi store for handset titles. The Ovi store shelves were a little bare when I last checked on Nokia’s Maemo-powered N900 handset, so the handset maker is looking to boost the available titles.

MeeGo devices are expected in the second half of this year and 27 partners ranging from Acer to Xandros are expressing support. Notable members of the partner list include high-profile software shops like EA Mobile and Gameloft. But industry friends alone won’t turn MeeGo into a contender against the likes of Apple, Google and others with established mobile platforms. As Stacey alluded last summer in her interview with Peter Farago, the VP of mobile analytics firm Flurry, developers are the new kingmakers. The programmers attending this week’s Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit will likely decide if MeeGo gains a royal crown or simply becomes a mobile bard just passing through.


Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

Mobile OSes Are No Longer Just About Mobile

Images courtesy of Intel

  1. [...] GigaOm reports on MeeGo momentum and activities at this week’s Collaboration Summit. [...]

  2. Grzegorz Daniluk Wednesday, April 14, 2010

    It seems that Nokia top management is frighten to death and hence cannot make a decision: Symbian or MeeGo. Do they expect developers to make apps for both platforms?!

    Do I miss something? Or maybe Nokia executives responsible for smart phones are that incompetent?

    At least Microsoft folks have balls. Decided to kill the Windows Mobile and start almost from scratch.

    1. Perhaps you just haven’t followed their moves and strategies lately. You’ve obviously missed to entire mission of Nokia, Intel, and MeeGo.

      Developers don’t have to write apps for two OSes. They share a primary application framework and toolkit in Qt, which allows apps to run on PCs, Macs, Linux netbooks and desktops, Unix systems, Windows Mobile, Symbian, and Maemo/MeeGo. MeeGo is more advanced and far reaching than Symbian, yet Symbian is more efficient and better suited for devices of meager hardware specs. Symbian is suited for mobile tech, while MeeGo is more versatile, with custom UI layouts for TVs, car entertainment systems, mobiles, and netbooks.

    2. MeeGo is more a pocket computer platform, not so much for smartphones.

  3. [...] platform version should a developer target and for how long should he or she expect compatibility? Nokia’s saving grace could be the Qt cross-platform framework, but I haven’t heard any chatter about mobile developers moving to Qt in significant numbers [...]

  4. [...] in the survey are creating software for stores other than Nokia. Nokia is touting plenty of easy app development methods through web standards and the Qt cross-platform framework, but high smartphone sales can lead to high software [...]

  5. [...] platforms — Symbian S60, Symbian^3, and MeeGo – across feature phones, smartphones and eventually netbooks. One web client that syncs preferences, bookmarks and passwords among those devices would make an [...]

  6. [...] and services that Nokia offer. In particular, I’ll be keen to hear from coders using Qt, Nokia’s cross-platform development framework, to learn how it compares to the tools used to create software for iOS, Android, and BlackBerry [...]

  7. [...] really a run-anywhere technology, but it can be if the WAC standards are followed. Between Java and cross-platform frameworks such as Nokia’s Qt, not to mention current and future standards like HTML and HTML5, is there really a need for more [...]

  8. [...] should throw out what they have learned and switch to a completely different set of tools (since Nokia’s cross-platform Qt development framework isn’t part of its WP7 strategy), I wouldn’t be surprised if most just throw up their [...]


Comments have been disabled for this post