17 Comments

Summary:

Nearly a year after the last MacBook Pro update, and months after Intel launched its latest mobile CPU, Apple has added Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs to the MacBook Pro…or at least most of them.

newmbp_thumb

Nearly a year after the last MacBook Pro update, and months after Intel launched its latest mobile CPU, Apple has added Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs to the MacBook Pro…or at least most of them. The 13″ MacBook Pro will continue to use the Core 2 brand of CPU technology first introduced in 2006. Apple Senior VP Phil Schiller carefully avoided that point in an ebullient press release.

“The new MacBook Pro is as advanced on the inside as it is stunning on the outside. With faster processors, amazing graphics and up to three more hours of battery life, the new MacBook Pro delivers both performance and efficiency.”

Those amazing graphics would be the NVIDIA GeForce 320M for the 13″ MacBook Pro and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M for the 15″ and 17″ MacBook Pros. Regarding battery life, Apple now claims a jaw-dropping 10 hours of battery life for the 13″ MacBook Pro, and between eight and nine hours for the 15″ and 17″ MacBook Pros.

Besides CPU speed increases, larger hard drives were added across the lineup, and the base configuration for RAM was increased from 2GB to 4GB. Pricing remained largely static, except for the 15″ MacBook Pro, which saw an increase from $1,699 to $1,799. While there aren’t really any big surprises, like USB3, there are a few small ones in the specs.

The 13″ MacBook Pro has two models: a 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 250GB hard drive at $1,199; a 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 320GB hard drive priced at $1,499.

The 15″ MacBook Pro has three models: a 2.4 GHz Intel Core i5, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and 320GB hard drive at $1,799; a 2.53 GHz Intel Core i5, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and 500GB hard drive at $1,999; and one with a 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and 500GB hard drive at $2,199.

The new 17-inch MacBook Pro features a 2.53 GHz Intel Core i5, NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M and 500GB hard drive for $2,299.

Beyond the specs, the focus is on the 13″ MacBook Pro, which got an insignificant speed bump instead of the Intel Core i5. However, it could be argued that by staying with the Core 2 Duo for the 13″ MacBook Pro, Apple kept the price down and the battery life up…way up. In contrast, the 15″ MacBook Pro, which in certain circumstances could be as much as 50 percent faster than the previous model, costs $100 more and lags behind the 13″ MacBook Pro in battery life.

While it’s no surprise that the 15″ and 17″ MacBook Pros got advanced NVIDIA GPUs, there was reason to be concerned about the 13″ MacBook Pro. Because of the legal battle between NVIDIA and Intel over chipsets, it was a distinct possibility that the 13″ MacBook Pro would be stuck with whatever poor-performing Intel HD graphics. Instead, the 13″ MacBook Pro got the NVIDIA GeForce 320M, integrated graphics, but without the Intel suck.

Interestingly, the 15″ and 17″ MacBook Pro did get stuck with Intel HD graphics, but only when it doesn’t matter. When a real GPU is needed, the high-end MacBook Pros have the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M, and the ability to “seamlessly” switch between integrated and discrete GPUs. Optionally the high-end MacBook Pros can be upgraded to the Core i7 for another $200, as well as higher resolution and anti-glare displays,

If there’s anything missing from these updates, besides the Core i5 in the 13″ MacBook Pro, it’s USB 3. While it might not matter now, in a year or two when many people are still using their Core i5 MacBook Pros it definitely will. A USB 3 update, along with Core i5 for the 13″ MacBook Pro will likely be seen in the fall, so perspective buyers might want to consider how long they intend on owning their next MacBook Pro before buying today.

  1. wth mate! no i3 for the macbook 13.3″ ??????? and no matte for macbook 13.3″ either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    Share
    1. now they finally put the i3 in imacs so guess which computer will feature i3? thats right after i purchased c2d

      Share
  2. LOL @ “perspective buyers”.

    I am disappointed that the 13-inch MBPs are being left out of the beefier upgrades. It feels like they should have kept these 13-inch aluminum models as MacBooks and not MacBook Pros.

    I agree that USB 3 would have been a logical addition to the line. Apple has succeeded in keeping themselves in the news, but they have failed if their intention was to make folks run out and buy a new Apple anything.

    I wonder how the folks who have been holding For this announcement out feel. Was it worth the wait? Leo?

    Share
    1. “holding out for this announcement” — oops.

      It never fails. You almost invariably make just as bad a grammar error when you point out someone else’s.

      Share
      1. That does seem to be an immutable law of commenting

        Share
      2. *grammatical error

        Share
  3. My 2006 Intel Core Duo 13″ MacBook still runs the most current OS and iLife apps etc with no noticeable performance. I see nothing here that compels me to upgrade.

    Share
    1. I meant “still runs the most current OS and iLife apps etc with no noticeable performance” issues.

      Share
    2. I agree. As an owner of an Intel X-25M SSD in a unibody MacBook, the performance boost is evident every time I launch a program. I’d strongly recommend that upgrade to an existing MacBook Pro owner over a new computer.

      Share
  4. Sigh. Was really wanting a Macbook Air refresh. It’s been nearly a year now. :(

    Share
    1. The interminable MacBook Air delay could be a result of a shift to Consumer Ultra-Low Voltage CPUs, which are themselves delayed by Intel. Alternately, it could be doomed:

      http://theappleblog.com/2009/07/15/the-macbook-air-is-doomed/

      Share
  5. When will they increase the screen resolution on the 15-inch? This 1440×900 is not cutting it.

    Share
    1. You can upgrade to 1680×1050 for $100. Another $50 gets you a matte screen instead of the glossy.

      Share
  6. This may prove handy for some, it’s a cool table-based comparison of the new MBP specs versus the prior generation

    http://switchtoamac.com/site/visually-comparing-apples-april-2010-macbook-pro-specs-to-the-june-2009-models.html

    You’ll see comps by model (13-inch, 15-inch, 17-inch), processors, graphics, memory, hard drive, battery, and so on.

    Share
  7. I’m still holding out for USB 3.0…looks like I’ll be waiting a while. Seriously, what’s taking so long? Fortunately, my 2006 Core Duo MBP is still doing just fine.

    Also wouldn’t be surprised the Air disappeared in the next update cycle. Aside from price, it’s basically unchanged since 2008. Apple’s either got to seriously upgrade it or just kill it.

    Share
    1. While the rumor is that Intel doesn’t plan to integrate USB3 with its chipsets until 2011, adding a separate USB controller is always an option. Other OEMs are doing it, and Apple is hardly averse to customizing their hardware. I am hopeful for the fall refresh, which possibly will see Core i5 for the 13″ MacBook Pro too.

      Share
  8. [...] Apple Updates MacBook Pros on TheAppleBlogTopics: Intel Core, Intel Core i7, MacBook, MacBook Pro [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post