<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the FTC Should Approve the Google-AdMob Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/04/10/why-the-ftc-should-approve-the-google-admob-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/04/10/why-the-ftc-should-approve-the-google-admob-deal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC OKs Google-AdMob Deal, Citing Apple&#8217;s iAd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/04/10/why-the-ftc-should-approve-the-google-admob-deal/#comment-246886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FTC OKs Google-AdMob Deal, Citing Apple&#8217;s iAd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 17:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=112056#comment-246886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the meantime, there were indications the FTC was leaning towards mounting a case against the deal, including mobile developers blogging that they had spoken with investigators who seemed to have [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the meantime, there were indications the FTC was leaning towards mounting a case against the deal, including mobile developers blogging that they had spoken with investigators who seemed to have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/04/10/why-the-ftc-should-approve-the-google-admob-deal/#comment-246885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=112056#comment-246885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I pray to God that the AdMob deal gets blocked. Google has a monopoly in search ads AdMob would be a monopoly in mobile as well. Don&#039;t let Google dominate mobile as well complain to the FTC!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pray to God that the AdMob deal gets blocked. Google has a monopoly in search ads AdMob would be a monopoly in mobile as well. Don&#8217;t let Google dominate mobile as well complain to the FTC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Sterling</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/04/10/why-the-ftc-should-approve-the-google-admob-deal/#comment-246884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Sterling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=112056#comment-246884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The IDC figures are incorrect based on interviews I conducted with several of the subject ad networks, which uniformly disputed them.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IDC figures are incorrect based on interviews I conducted with several of the subject ad networks, which uniformly disputed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
