6 Comments

Summary:

Under the current structure of vehicle ownership and warranties, automakers would suffer from the depreciation of electric vehicle batteries if the devices used to provide certain services for the power grid. But utilities and consumers could benefit.

Better Place, Yokohama, JapanFor an electric vehicle owner and a utility, a dream scenario for charging vehicles at the lowest possible cost might go something like this: EV batteries draw juice from the grid when demand and electricity rates are low, and feed energy back into the grid when demand peaks. That give and take could deliver lower electricity bills for consumers and a more stable grid for the utility. But there’s also a third party in the equation — the car maker — which could struggle in this scenario unless the current structure of vehicle ownership and warranties is changed, said Joby Lafky, senior director of business development and partnerships for smart charging startup GridPoint at a seminar on vehicle-to-grid technology hosted by Agrion on Wednesday in Palo Alto, Calif.

The EV industry needs to consider alternative ownership schemes for the battery, and/or “reexamine what it means to warranty a battery pack,” said Lafky. Currently automakers typically offer “an odometer-based warranty,” said Lafky, but if electric vehicle batteries — the most expensive part of the car — are used to provide grid services, the battery will depreciate due to all the charging and discharging, not just mileage. So if the battery gets used up faster, and it’s within the warranty period, the automaker could get stuck paying to replace it.

While the bulk of an electric vehicle may have just as much longevity and durability as conventional models, today’s batteries are widely expected to degrade down to 80 percent of their original storage capacity (and thus reach the end of their useful life in electric cars) after only about eight years on the road. Outside of the vehicle, batteries can hold value long after those eight years.

By offering the battery under a separate leasing agreement, an automaker could have car buyers pay for only the small percentage of the value they’re getting (the car minus the expensive battery) — as long as the automaker has a mechanism in place to reclaim the battery after its useful life in the vehicle and reap its “residual value” in secondary markets. However, rolling the battery pack into one contract with the vehicle — rather than covering it under a separate warranty agreement, or potentially leasing it separately from the car — could deliver higher warranty costs for the automaker and a higher sticker price for consumers.

Alec Brooks, a renewable energy engineer for Google who’s credited with coining the term V2G and who previously directed vehicle technology for Tesla Motors, commented that ancillary services (such as switching directions between charging and discharging) won’t necessarily take a significantly greater toll on battery life than the wear and tear of simply driving the car. (Google’s Bill Weihl and Edward Lu will be speaking at our Green:Net conference in San Francisco on April 29.)

Even so, Lafky isn’t the only one who sees shifting ownership and battery warranties as a key to paving the way to more affordable, mainstream electric vehicles that help — rather than hurt — the power grid.

According to Tom Gage, CEO of AC Propulsion, the “most fertile area for development in this whole space is the battery.” Regardless of the size, shape or chemistry that upcoming generations of batteries take on, however, he noted three potential value streams for the device: one, transportation; two, grid services while it’s in the car; and three, secondary markets (after useful life in the vehicle). Part of the challenge, said Gage, is to strike the right balance among these three uses in a way that maximizes “extraction of these value streams over the life of the car.”

Brett Williams, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center, added that the introduction of a viable “novel ownership structure,” which could be “battery leasing in a simple form,” could represent the tipping point for electric vehicles in the mass market.

Leasing the battery pack separately from the vehicle is a route that Nissan once considered for its upcoming LEAF electric sedan (Mark Perry, who heads up Nissan’s product planning and strategy for North America, will be speaking on our New Networked Car panel at Green:Net). Offering the battery pack under a separate financing agreement could allow an automaker like Nissan to take a significant chunk out of the sticker price of an electric model, potentially helping it to compete with more affordable conventional vehicles. But in February the automaker announced it would take the more conservative path of offering the car and battery under a “single transaction.”

Electric vehicle infrastructure startup Better Place, meanwhile, plans to buy hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of batteries to “swap” into vehicles owned by subscribers, who in theory will pay Better Place for mileage plans the way cell phone users pay for minutes.

Hypothetically, at least, if all the players and industries can come together, said Williams (a hugely difficult task, he acknowledged), novel alternatives to outright consumer ownership of batteries “would really accelerate everything…at a very minimum, you’ve got to have an ownership structure that lets you see that value throughout the whole product.”

Photos courtesy of Better Place and Flickr user amalthya.

This article also appeared on BusinessWeek.com

  1. The obvious solution is overlooked here.

    Why does the battery HAVE to be leased by the consumer for the manufacturer to sell-on the battery when it reaches 80% DOC ?

    The same is possible with a simple warranty replacement where the cost of the warranty to the manufacturer can be off-set against what-ever utility grid storage sales agreement they have in place and the predictable drop in battery prices from mass production. (i.e. in a decades time when a battery pack needs replacing the price per kwh will be dramatically lower)

    That way the consumer doesn’t see any financial transaction or at worst an extremely low ‘out of warranty’ price , and the manufacture gets to sell the battery pack a second time as a trade in.

    In fact… this kind of arrangement could prove so advantageous to manufactures they may be able to subsidies the new car sales price with funds from these utility sales.

    It’s also highly likely that in the early days of EVs, the battery manufacture will carry the pack warranty, but the consumer will only have to deal with the auto manufacture.

    With all the BS surrounding the GFC the last thing consumers want to know about is more ‘trick financing’. The aim should be to make EV ownership as idiot proof and low stress as possible, by minimizing the overhead of ownership… not allow every egg heads and his dog to create more opportunities for a bit of wealth redistribution.

    Share
    1. I like the way you’re thinking, Paul. Egg heads and dogs can certainly stir up more complexity than necessary. :-)

      Share
  2. [...] After that first generation, “based on durability and warranty data,” Zambrano said automakers will likely learn more about how far they can push the limits on those batteries. So if you can get 100 miles of range out of a 700-pound battery pack today when the discharge limits are typically set around 50 percent, you could in theory get more miles out of that same pack if it’s set to allow deeper discharging. Data from upcoming plug-in vehicle deployments could help automakers understand whether and how much they can afford to shift that setting — without foreshortening battery life and risking the cost of replacing batteries under warranty. [...]

    Share
  3. [...] to us last year major automakers “are not going to go down that path anytime soon.” Many automakers are wary of the impact that V2G will have on battery life and warranty costs. Ford doesn’t expect V2G to be deployed [...]

    Share
  4. [...] (rather than lease it) and fail to provide “appropriate warranty,” (check out some ideas for new battery warranty schemes here) then an electric car’s value will “fall dramatically until the vehicle is five years [...]

    Share
  5. [...] Down the road, Swanton expects that more automakers will lease batteries separately from electric vehicles so that the cost of the battery becomes “immaterial” to prospective buyers. According to Joby Lafky, senior director of business development and partnerships for smart charging startup GridPoint, alternative ownership schemes for the battery — or reinvention of “what it means to warranty a battery pack” —  will be needed in order for electric vehicles to achieve their potential providing energy storage services for the power grid. [...]

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post