7 Comments

Summary:

The controversial Digital Economy Bill may have had a few parts stripped out, it may even be a damp squib. But the remaining, 76-page bill i…

The controversial Digital Economy Bill may have had a few parts stripped out, it may even be a damp squib. But the remaining, 76-page bill is still a wide-ranging piece of media and technology reform.

Confused? Read our clause-by-clause guide to the bill as it stands now after being adopted by the House Of Commons and as it awaits Royal Assent…

Media regulation

#1: Widen Ofcom’s scope from TV and radio to all “media services”, promoting investment in networks and public service content. Withdrawn by govt.

#2: Ofcom must produce reports on the state of network infrastructure and internet domain name registration.

#3: In those reports, Ofcom must also report on how TV, radio, on-demand and other editorialised websites contribute to public service objectives.

Illegal downloads

#4: After apparent copyright abuse, copyright holders can send a “copyright infringement report” to ISPs with evidence of the downloading, within one month of the alleged incident. The ISP must notify its subscriber within a month, providing education about legal alternatives, evidence and information about appeals and legal advice.

#5: ISPs, if requested, must provide copyright holders with a “copyright infringement list”, listing each infringement by an individual, anonymised user.

#6: Sets out conditions for approval of “initial obligations” code under which Ofcom can deliver the above two copyright clauses.

#7: If no such code exists, Ofcom can make its own.

#8: Populates the content of the “initial obligations” code, which would see that ISPs must not notify subscribers of alleged infringements more than a year old.

#9: Ofcom must report, every three and 12 months, on the extent of online copyright infringement, whether copyright owners are making content legally available, how the education drive is progressing and the volume of “copyright infringement reports”.

#10: The govt. can tell Ofcom whether it should order ISPs to sanction speed blocks, bandwidth shaping, site blocking, account suspension or other limits against an ISP customer. First, Ofcom must do consultation and consider whether these measures would work.

#11: If the measures pass Ofcom’s muster, the govt. can then level the measures against ISPs, but only if approved by both houses of parliament.

#12: Ofcom must make its own code regulating how these measures can be sanctioned…

#13: The code must cover enforcement procedures, subscriber appeals, costs are taken care of and that Ofcom would arbitrate owner-ISP disputes.

#14: Subscribers can appeal to an independent person named in Ofcom’s code and, later, to a first-tier tribunal. Costs would be met by the ISP, copyright holder and subscriber.

#15: ISPs that fail to apply technical measures against subscribers can be fined up to £250,000, as Ofcom determines.

#16: Copyright owners must pay Ofcom’s costs; both copyright owners and ISPs must pay costs of implementing technical measures; accused subscribers must also share appeal costs.

#17: Defines terms.

#18: High Court can grant injunction forcing ISPs to block access to “online locations” if a “substantial portion” of that location infringes copyright. ISPs must pay copyright owners’ court fees unless in “exceptional circumstances”. Withdrawn by govt.reinserted as NC1 amendment which would require further specific parliamentary approval.

Domain names

#19: The govt can notify domain name registry if it thinks they are seriously failing, after reading Ofcom’s report (#2).

#20: The govt can install its own manager at a failing domain name registry.

#21: The govt can apply for a court order altering the constitution of failing domain name registry.

Channel 4

#22: Adds film production and distribution to Channel 4′s remit. C4 must support people “making innovative content” (ie. 4iP?) and must produce news and content for children and teens.

#23: Channel 4 must produce an annual report stating its goals and monitoring its performance. Ofcom must also review C4 and can bring sanctions if it fails.

Commercial TV

#24: Allows for single franchise areas for both Scotland and England.

#25: Sets December 2014 expiry date for Channel 3 and Channel 5 public teletext license terms

#26: Provides for expiry of those licenses themselves.

#27: Ofcom must report on the public teletext licenses and “whether (they) can be provided at a cost to the licence holder that is commercially sustainable”, but it “must take account of alternative uses for the capacity that would be available if the public teletext service were not provided”.

#28: Can remove public teletext services from Ofcom oversight.

Regional TV news

#29: Allows Ofcom to appoint news providers in a Channel 3 franchise area, and pay them (ie. IFNCs). But Ofcom must notify current franchise owners (ITV) and heed what they say. Withdrawn by govt., throwing IFNC plan in to doubt.

#30: Removes Gaelic programming regulation from Ofcom’s auspice.

Radio spectrum

#31: The govt. can specify digital switchover dates.

#32: Ofcom can renew national radio licenses at seven-year terms.

#33: Governs how Ofcom can vary local digital radio licenses.

#34: Sets out how Ofcom can vary local radio licenses after they have been renewed.

#35: Defines areas in which local radio programming must be made.

#36: Ofcom can decide whether to vary national digital radio multiplex license areas and analogue frequency areas if applied to by the license holder.

#37: The govt. allows Ofcom to decide on national digital radio multiplex license renewal.

#38: Generally allows the govt. to include or exclude new measures for broadcast regulation regimes.

#39: Sets out how spectrum holders must pay for the license.

#40: Sets out how Ofcom can penalise license holders which breach their terms.

Video games

#41: Extends game regulation under Video Recordings Act 1984 to games that include violence to humans or animals, encouragement of criminality, drug use, encouragement of alcohol or tobacco use, sexual messages, swearing, offence.

#42: But allows for video game’ regulatory responsibility to be separate from video works.

Intellectual property

#43: Would allow copyrighted works to be re-used if author can’t be found (orphan works). Withdrawn by govt.

#44: Raises maximum penalty for criminally making copyright-infringing works to £50,000.

#45: Absolves libraries of copyright infringement if they lend out non-traditional “books”, ie e-books and audiobooks.

Broadband

The government withdrew plans, in the separate Finance Bill, for a £0.50-a-month levy on phone land lines to create an Independent Next Generation Fund – a stash any telco could bid for to part-subsidise the roll-out of truly high-speed broadband.

  1. Amazing to think that the DE Bill grew out of the Digital Britain report, whose purpose was to set out how to stimulate the digital economy. This is really a copyrights and broadcasting bill, which mainly specifies what can’t be done, rather than providing measures for stimulus.

    Share
  2. Nice the way our democracy works…

    Share
  3. The Bill passed and now, it’s time for MPs who ignored are warnings to face their responsibilities and enlighten us, users on how to comply with the law:
    The questions MPs need to answer: http://clarinettesblog.wordpress.com/

    Share
  4. make no mistake. this is a big bailout for big media.

    they couldn’t compete in economic terms. now they’ve appealed to the government to maintain their monopoly forever.

    the flipside, of course, is that by protecting the past, britain just killed it’s digital future.

    nice move, guys. way to go.

    Share
  5. what the “creative” industry want is more money for their luxurious and depravity way of life and drug habits!!
    Thanks to the missing mp’s. They were problably partying with them, snifing coke!!!
    Im sick of being spyed all the time… the facism is back again.

    Share
  6. I would like to know what the government defines as “evidence” for these type of copyright infringement cases. As it is still impossible to prove that any particular person was sitting in front of their pc at any particular time.

    Share
  7. Digital Economy Bill: Quick Guide To All 45 Measures
    http://tinyurl.com/yeefdp5

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post