<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic: Android for TVs Is Too Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google TV Is Pricing Itself Out of the Market: Video &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google TV Is Pricing Itself Out of the Market: Video &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] away entirely. Panasonic EVP Bob Perry, for instance, said earlier this year that his company would not be deploying Google TV-powered products, largely due to the costs involved with building [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] away entirely. Panasonic EVP Bob Perry, for instance, said earlier this year that his company would not be deploying Google TV-powered products, largely due to the costs involved with building [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung May Deploy Google TV After All</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samsung May Deploy Google TV After All]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of products from Sony and Logitech running the operating system, consumer electronics companies like Panasonic have complained that the cost of components necessary to power the platform are too pricey. Based [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of products from Sony and Logitech running the operating system, consumer electronics companies like Panasonic have complained that the cost of components necessary to power the platform are too pricey. Based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Expands Widget Availability With Sony, But Google TV Looms</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yahoo Expands Widget Availability With Sony, But Google TV Looms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The good news for Yahoo TV Widgets is that in the short term, adoption of Google TV might be limited, in part due to higher prices expected for CE products that run the Google OS. Because they require a more expensive processor and dedicated RAM, Google TV-enabled TVs and other devices are expected to be sold at a premium to other connected TVs. Some CE makers &#8212; like Panasonic &#8212; have shied away from the system altogether, saying it is too expensive. [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The good news for Yahoo TV Widgets is that in the short term, adoption of Google TV might be limited, in part due to higher prices expected for CE products that run the Google OS. Because they require a more expensive processor and dedicated RAM, Google TV-enabled TVs and other devices are expected to be sold at a premium to other connected TVs. Some CE makers &#8212; like Panasonic &#8212; have shied away from the system altogether, saying it is too expensive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required Specs Could Make Google TV Too Pricey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Required Specs Could Make Google TV Too Pricey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] would be too pricey. In March, Panasonic EVP Bob Perry told Bloomberg that the Android OS would require too much processing power to make it a viable [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would be too pricey. In March, Panasonic EVP Bob Perry told Bloomberg that the Android OS would require too much processing power to make it a viable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Google to Showcase TV Platform at I/O Conference</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Report: Google to Showcase TV Platform at I/O Conference]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on the other hand, has said that it is not interested in Google TV. Panasonic&#8217;s EVP Bob Perry also recently stated that his company isn&#8217;t working on any Google TV devices, because of cost issues associated with the processing power needs to run [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the other hand, has said that it is not interested in Google TV. Panasonic&#8217;s EVP Bob Perry also recently stated that his company isn&#8217;t working on any Google TV devices, because of cost issues associated with the processing power needs to run [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Samsung Jump on the Google TV Bandwagon? &#171; The BAT Channel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Samsung Jump on the Google TV Bandwagon? &#171; The BAT Channel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Samsung Jump on the Google TV Bandwagon? &#171; AccessTech News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Samsung Jump on the Google TV Bandwagon? &#171; AccessTech News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung also into Google TV Band &#124; Fraz Us !</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samsung also into Google TV Band &#124; Fraz Us !]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that can run Google’s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That’s because, according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Samsung Jump On the Google TV Bandwagon?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Samsung Jump On the Google TV Bandwagon?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] can run Google&#8217;s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That&#8217;s because, according [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can run Google&#8217;s OS might be prohibitively expensive. Panasonic, for instance, reportedly decided against using Android on its connected TV sets because of costs associated with doing so. That&#8217;s because, according [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google TV: Another Reason Open Sourcing VP8 Matters</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/31/panasonic-android-for-tvs-is-too-expensive/#comment-482590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google TV: Another Reason Open Sourcing VP8 Matters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=45090#comment-482590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] box, but it has also been talking to CE makers to get onto devices with less processing power.  Panasonic EVP Bob Perry recently stated that his company shied away from Android on its connected TV sets because the OS would have [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] box, but it has also been talking to CE makers to get onto devices with less processing power.  Panasonic EVP Bob Perry recently stated that his company shied away from Android on its connected TV sets because the OS would have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
