1 Comment

Summary:

Google, Microsoft, AT&T, Salesforce.com, AOL, Intel, Loopt are asking for updates to federal electronic privacy laws to address new forms of surveillance and data collecting. Coalition members would like to defend themselves and their users from forced sharing of data contributed through email and location-tracking services.

Google, Microsoft, AT&T, Salesforce.com, AOL, Intel, Loopt and numerous advocacy groups are asking the U.S. Congress to update its electronic privacy legislation in order to address new forms of surveillance and data collecting. The so-called Digital Due Process coalition members say they want to defend themselves and their users from forced sharing of their email, hosted documents and mobile location tracking.

The law in question is the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which dates back to 1986, and whose designers didn’t anticipate activities such as email, mobile location tracking, cloud computing and social networking. Citing a “murky legal landscape” about how ECPA is applied, Digital Due Process is requesting four changes:

* Government access to private hosted communications should require a search warrant.

* Government access to mobile location data should require a search warrant.

* Permission to track call and email records should require judicial review.

* Subpoenaed information has to be for a specific individual unless approved by a judge.

Though the proposed changes might seem fair enough, CNET points out that they are at odds with the Obama Administration’s statements that mobile users shouldn’t reasonably expect to keep their location private.

For an in-depth look at the cloud computing industry, join us at our Structure conference in June here in San Francisco. In the meantime, for background on cloud computing and the law, see:

Can the Cloud Catalyze Change in International Data Laws?

As Cloud Computing Goes International, Whose Laws Matter (sub req’d)

http://www.youtube.com/v/AYYjr3XNaGs&hl=en_US&fs=1&

  1. Great! And they should also look into limiting the access that private firms have to this information as well, as it seems that they are the ones making this information available to various government entities.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post