<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Facebook be the One Ring for Location?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Places Will Be About More Than Just a Check-In</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Places Will Be About More Than Just a Check-In]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook Places launches, it will be far more than just a check-in API. As the social network has said in the past, it thinks about places as more than just location data associated with a status [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook Places launches, it will be far more than just a check-in API. As the social network has said in the past, it thinks about places as more than just location data associated with a status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Wants to Own All Your Social Graphs, Not Just One</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Wants to Own All Your Social Graphs, Not Just One]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Which brings me to the next thought that Dixon&#8217;s post triggered: namely, that Facebook has a massive head start on owning virtually every one of these sub-graphs, with the possible exception of the &#8220;financial trust&#8221; graph &#8212; and with Facebook Credits rolling out, it&#8217;s likely the giant social network will get its hooks into that one soon as well. Certainly recommendation-based graphs powered by the &#8220;likes&#8221; of 500 million users could be fairly powerful. And when it comes to local, Facebook appears to be working on features in that area as well, although it&#8217;s not clear what form they will take. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which brings me to the next thought that Dixon&#8217;s post triggered: namely, that Facebook has a massive head start on owning virtually every one of these sub-graphs, with the possible exception of the &#8220;financial trust&#8221; graph &#8212; and with Facebook Credits rolling out, it&#8217;s likely the giant social network will get its hooks into that one soon as well. Certainly recommendation-based graphs powered by the &#8220;likes&#8221; of 500 million users could be fairly powerful. And when it comes to local, Facebook appears to be working on features in that area as well, although it&#8217;s not clear what form they will take. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Foursquare Out of the Picture, Facebook Buys Nextstop</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[With Foursquare Out of the Picture, Facebook Buys Nextstop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Facebook&#8217;s location strategy is a hotly anticipated unknown. The company has given repeated vague answers about what it will do to help connect its users to places in the real world. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook&#8217;s location strategy is a hotly anticipated unknown. The company has given repeated vague answers about what it will do to help connect its users to places in the real world. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sounds Like Facebook Will Be Partnering With Foursquare, Not Competing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sounds Like Facebook Will Be Partnering With Foursquare, Not Competing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] partners. This adds some fuel to the theory that Facebook will use its social networking clout to become an aggregator of location-based services such as Foursquare and Gowalla, rather than launching its own competing service or trying to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] partners. This adds some fuel to the theory that Facebook will use its social networking clout to become an aggregator of location-based services such as Foursquare and Gowalla, rather than launching its own competing service or trying to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Didn&#8217;t Facebook Launch Location Features?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Didn&#8217;t Facebook Launch Location Features?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] to tag tweets &#8212; but it would be just as easy, and would still allow Facebook to become the one ring for location, if it allowed other services to use its social graph API and then aggregated and mined the [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to tag tweets &#8212; but it would be just as easy, and would still allow Facebook to become the one ring for location, if it allowed other services to use its social graph API and then aggregated and mined the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Your Facebook Friends Really Who They Say They Are?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Your Facebook Friends Really Who They Say They Are?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Will Facebook be the One Ring for&#160;Location? [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Facebook be the One Ring for&nbsp;Location? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger_tee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger_tee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree that the jury is out. But I have serious doubts that the broader population will entrust numerous private, and likely unknown, companies with rich and continuous information about their physical location. The information is very powerful and power corrupts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is in my opinion only 1 LBS proposition the majority of the mainstream public would agree is valuable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That value is the Traditional GPS &quot;Directions&quot; searches - Summarized it&#039;s the &quot;Search for an address or type of businesses/service/landmark/event and route me to that address from my current location&quot; value proposition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a proactive &quot;pull information&quot; use case where the user initiates and controls the entire LBS use case. In these use cases the users location is not being continuously broadcast for the consumption of other people or entities. Of course mobile operators do have continuous location information about their users phones, GPS enabled or not, but they are not, at least so far, in the businesses of making that information broadly available.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t believe most people will feel comfortable having their location continuously tracked by numerous third parties without explicit control of every tracking session. Very few people, once they think about it, will want &quot;electronic solicitors&quot; approaching the user either electronically or physically as a result of the broadcast of the status of their locations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While there certainly is a population of people who are comfortable with advertising their location broadly to other people and businesses in the context of social networking, that population is for the foreseeable future going to be, IMO, less than 10% of the adult population.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the jury is out. But I have serious doubts that the broader population will entrust numerous private, and likely unknown, companies with rich and continuous information about their physical location. The information is very powerful and power corrupts.</p>
<p>There is in my opinion only 1 LBS proposition the majority of the mainstream public would agree is valuable.</p>
<p>That value is the Traditional GPS &#8220;Directions&#8221; searches &#8211; Summarized it&#8217;s the &#8220;Search for an address or type of businesses/service/landmark/event and route me to that address from my current location&#8221; value proposition.</p>
<p>This is a proactive &#8220;pull information&#8221; use case where the user initiates and controls the entire LBS use case. In these use cases the users location is not being continuously broadcast for the consumption of other people or entities. Of course mobile operators do have continuous location information about their users phones, GPS enabled or not, but they are not, at least so far, in the businesses of making that information broadly available.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe most people will feel comfortable having their location continuously tracked by numerous third parties without explicit control of every tracking session. Very few people, once they think about it, will want &#8220;electronic solicitors&#8221; approaching the user either electronically or physically as a result of the broadcast of the status of their locations.</p>
<p>While there certainly is a population of people who are comfortable with advertising their location broadly to other people and businesses in the context of social networking, that population is for the foreseeable future going to be, IMO, less than 10% of the adult population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s true to say there&#039;s no significant value to consumers to share their location with companies -- I think there could be (depending on the person), but it remains to be seen whether there is enough value for enough people to make it worthwhile as a market.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s true to say there&#8217;s no significant value to consumers to share their location with companies &#8212; I think there could be (depending on the person), but it remains to be seen whether there is enough value for enough people to make it worthwhile as a market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Stefan -- I agree that in order for Facebook to gain, it has to open up more via two-way APIs.  Give something to get something  :-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Stefan &#8212; I agree that in order for Facebook to gain, it has to open up more via two-way APIs.  Give something to get something  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un nouveau système de localisation sur Facebook &#124; Mix Marketing Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/facebook-and-location/#comment-245331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Un nouveau système de localisation sur Facebook &#124; Mix Marketing Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=108782#comment-245331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Gigaom.com Géoconcept – Le géomarketing   Partagez cet article! [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gigaom.com Géoconcept – Le géomarketing   Partagez cet article! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
