<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Challenge for Network Operators in Mobile Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OFFICIAL VIDEO: Betfair Manchester United crossbar challenge Rooney, Giggs, Neville &#38; Fletcher &#124; Betfair LayBetting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/#comment-244134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OFFICIAL VIDEO: Betfair Manchester United crossbar challenge Rooney, Giggs, Neville &#38; Fletcher &#124; Betfair LayBetting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=106131#comment-244134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] The Challenge for Network Operators in Mobile Web 2.0 – GigaOM [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Challenge for Network Operators in Mobile Web 2.0 – GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cranstone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/#comment-244133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cranstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=106131#comment-244133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Steve,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great post. I particularly like this comment:  They need/want a marketplace where transactions occur and they already have a billing relationship w/ the subscriber.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s the problem - opportunity. What about billing information from the other carrier. What if they could get that in real time every time some accessed say the buzz.com web site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s huge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s some other ideas... re AT&amp;T and Buzz&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Competitive Intelligence: Access to directly market to competitors’ customers: (via name, phone number, IMEI number, email address)
Recapture Lost Revenue:  They can extend their service off the network to existing AT&amp;T and any customer (roaming &amp; Wi-Fi connected customers)
New Revenue: They can personalize and/or localize ads &amp; charge a premium
New Revenue:  They can charge a premium fee for personalized or “friend” group location-based services
Competitive Advantage/Reduce Time to Market: They could easily incorporate existing services (ie. movie reviews, restaurant reviews) into Buzz branded composite service without having to innovate, build or host all the individual services.
New Revenue:  They can share/sell the data with the originating service providers, advertisers or local merchants – the First Data trusted manager scenario (see their site for additional white papers on this)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All the need is the customers meta data in real time.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Great post. I particularly like this comment:  They need/want a marketplace where transactions occur and they already have a billing relationship w/ the subscriber.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the problem &#8211; opportunity. What about billing information from the other carrier. What if they could get that in real time every time some accessed say the buzz.com web site.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s huge.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some other ideas&#8230; re AT&amp;T and Buzz</p>
<p>Competitive Intelligence: Access to directly market to competitors’ customers: (via name, phone number, IMEI number, email address)<br />
Recapture Lost Revenue:  They can extend their service off the network to existing AT&amp;T and any customer (roaming &amp; Wi-Fi connected customers)<br />
New Revenue: They can personalize and/or localize ads &amp; charge a premium<br />
New Revenue:  They can charge a premium fee for personalized or “friend” group location-based services<br />
Competitive Advantage/Reduce Time to Market: They could easily incorporate existing services (ie. movie reviews, restaurant reviews) into Buzz branded composite service without having to innovate, build or host all the individual services.<br />
New Revenue:  They can share/sell the data with the originating service providers, advertisers or local merchants – the First Data trusted manager scenario (see their site for additional white papers on this)</p>
<p>All the need is the customers meta data in real time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/#comment-244132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=106131#comment-244132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the note, Peter. Carriers have never been much good at doing anything other than operating a network, so it&#039;ll be interesting to see whether they come up with any cross-network services that customers will buy into.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hope all&#039;s well in Boulder.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, Peter. Carriers have never been much good at doing anything other than operating a network, so it&#8217;ll be interesting to see whether they come up with any cross-network services that customers will buy into.</p>
<p>Hope all&#8217;s well in Boulder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevecheney</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/#comment-244131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevecheney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=106131#comment-244131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I wrote about what carriers are actually doing -- technology-wise -- to get into the applications game. It&#039;s more than just a branded-app play&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about what carriers are actually doing &#8212; technology-wise &#8212; to get into the applications game. It&#8217;s more than just a branded-app play</p>
<p><a href="http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh" rel="nofollow">http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cranstone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/16/the-challenge-for-network-operators-in-mobile-web-2-0/#comment-244130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cranstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=106131#comment-244130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Colin,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an incredibly insightful post. You&#039;ve just nailed the Carrier&#039;s business problem. They need to drive net new services revenue without driving up network expenses. Only way to do this is to do it across other carrier platforms.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin,</p>
<p>This is an incredibly insightful post. You&#8217;ve just nailed the Carrier&#8217;s business problem. They need to drive net new services revenue without driving up network expenses. Only way to do this is to do it across other carrier platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

