<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google/Apple Feud Gets More Impassioned, Personal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not getting personal, I feel.

There is even a website about these two companies. Check it out :- http://theapplegoogle.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not getting personal, I feel.</p>
<p>There is even a website about these two companies. Check it out :- <a href="http://theapplegoogle.com" rel="nofollow">http://theapplegoogle.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Görsel Sanatlar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Görsel Sanatlar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so don’t buy an iphone. go play w/ google and your android os and quit complaining.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so don’t buy an iphone. go play w/ google and your android os and quit complaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eideard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eideard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just another ego-smitten ideologue.  Apple&#039;s style doesn&#039;t limit anyone&#039;s choices.  You don&#039;t like &#039;em - go elsewhere.

Back in the day, this was called petit-bourgeis radicalism.  It produced SDS, 3rd party politicos like Pete Camejo - people for whom their purity is a religion and therefore &quot;you all must adopt my revelations&quot;.

Apple can design what they wish, so can Google, so did Sun when it was managed by people like Bray - and we see how well that worked out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another ego-smitten ideologue.  Apple&#8217;s style doesn&#8217;t limit anyone&#8217;s choices.  You don&#8217;t like &#8216;em &#8211; go elsewhere.</p>
<p>Back in the day, this was called petit-bourgeis radicalism.  It produced SDS, 3rd party politicos like Pete Camejo &#8211; people for whom their purity is a religion and therefore &#8220;you all must adopt my revelations&#8221;.</p>
<p>Apple can design what they wish, so can Google, so did Sun when it was managed by people like Bray &#8211; and we see how well that worked out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KsbjA</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KsbjA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said. That&#039;s where all the me-too stores fail. They don&#039;t set limits. For example, I have a Nokia phone at the moment, and Nokia&#039;s store is flooded with worthless and unconfirmed stuff. The user reviews don&#039;t help here either, because the store isn&#039;t localized in any way, thus everybody writes in his/her native language. Pros to Apple&#039;s strict rules, which keep the iPhone from getting messed up by bad apps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. That&#8217;s where all the me-too stores fail. They don&#8217;t set limits. For example, I have a Nokia phone at the moment, and Nokia&#8217;s store is flooded with worthless and unconfirmed stuff. The user reviews don&#8217;t help here either, because the store isn&#8217;t localized in any way, thus everybody writes in his/her native language. Pros to Apple&#8217;s strict rules, which keep the iPhone from getting messed up by bad apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my opinion, this whole argument is a waste of time. 

The only real issue in this argument is ideals. People get upset about the fact that some certain apps arent allowed to be on the app store for whatever reasons. 

What would be different if all these apps were allowed? Nothing.

You would just have more apps to choose from. thats it. nothing more. 

Its not as if youre life changes in any way, because you cant look at boobs through an iPhone app. Hell, you can just do it through mobile safari instead! 

My point is, when you forget all the ethics, morals, and all that crap, and think to yourself, what would happen if i opened my iphone and went into an app store with no restrictions... what would you see? youd see exactly the same thing, but with a lot more crap to sift through to find the good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, this whole argument is a waste of time. </p>
<p>The only real issue in this argument is ideals. People get upset about the fact that some certain apps arent allowed to be on the app store for whatever reasons. </p>
<p>What would be different if all these apps were allowed? Nothing.</p>
<p>You would just have more apps to choose from. thats it. nothing more. </p>
<p>Its not as if youre life changes in any way, because you cant look at boobs through an iPhone app. Hell, you can just do it through mobile safari instead! </p>
<p>My point is, when you forget all the ethics, morals, and all that crap, and think to yourself, what would happen if i opened my iphone and went into an app store with no restrictions&#8230; what would you see? youd see exactly the same thing, but with a lot more crap to sift through to find the good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t this Google = open, Apple = closed meme is ridiculous. What will you be able to run on Chrome beyond Google products. Google is not less protectionist than Apple, they just do it in different ways. They want to be the gatekeeper to the web after all, all roads lead to the Google cloud. To me, you cannot get more closed than that. 

Apple is by no means perfect. I don&#039;t claim everything they do is right. I don&#039;t like everything they do either. But they don&#039;t hide behind the shield of &quot;open-ness&quot; They have enough history to understand that you&#039;ve got to protect your turf after surviving through the Microsoft Ages. It is easy for Google, a virtual monopoly to lecture a niche player that they should play by Google&#039;s rules. But if you play by those rules, you&#039;ll lose your lunch, eventually.    
 
With the App Store (particularly now that the iPad has arrived), Apple has developed a potential way for content providers to actually make money off their content instead of giving it to Google to make money off of. Instead of giving it away free on the web, you pay for it. There are both advantages and diadvantages to this approach. Right now, I see the biggest advatange being buyer empowerment. You can price your content any way you want, but ultimately buyers have more influence than traditionally and developers have more tools to find the right price. The App Store has many good deals for both users and devs. Apple has far less potential to control the future of the web than Google does. What Apple can do is hopefully keep places like the New York Times and the news business from collapsing, so that we are not left with a world covered only by blogs. Hopefully they can also make the price of books more reasonable, too, by opening up the playing field for book distribution.  Google and the open web just aren&#039;t going to save those two endeavors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this Google = open, Apple = closed meme is ridiculous. What will you be able to run on Chrome beyond Google products. Google is not less protectionist than Apple, they just do it in different ways. They want to be the gatekeeper to the web after all, all roads lead to the Google cloud. To me, you cannot get more closed than that. </p>
<p>Apple is by no means perfect. I don&#8217;t claim everything they do is right. I don&#8217;t like everything they do either. But they don&#8217;t hide behind the shield of &#8220;open-ness&#8221; They have enough history to understand that you&#8217;ve got to protect your turf after surviving through the Microsoft Ages. It is easy for Google, a virtual monopoly to lecture a niche player that they should play by Google&#8217;s rules. But if you play by those rules, you&#8217;ll lose your lunch, eventually.    </p>
<p>With the App Store (particularly now that the iPad has arrived), Apple has developed a potential way for content providers to actually make money off their content instead of giving it to Google to make money off of. Instead of giving it away free on the web, you pay for it. There are both advantages and diadvantages to this approach. Right now, I see the biggest advatange being buyer empowerment. You can price your content any way you want, but ultimately buyers have more influence than traditionally and developers have more tools to find the right price. The App Store has many good deals for both users and devs. Apple has far less potential to control the future of the web than Google does. What Apple can do is hopefully keep places like the New York Times and the news business from collapsing, so that we are not left with a world covered only by blogs. Hopefully they can also make the price of books more reasonable, too, by opening up the playing field for book distribution.  Google and the open web just aren&#8217;t going to save those two endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyMark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkyMark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d sympathise with Bray if Apple was putting the same regulations on surfing the web with their iDevices. Even -if- Apple is keeping the app developers on a short leash, it&#039;s their good right. It&#039;s their device, it&#039;s their AppStore, it&#039;s their playground.

You can still surf the web freely with your iDevice. If you want smut, there&#039;s a phlethora of XXX sites out there, specifically made for mobile devices. If you want to bypass the AppStore, go develop a web app. There&#039;s plenty of frameworks out there, use them.

Don&#039;t forget: When the iPhone initially came to be, Apple did not intend for it to run 3rd party applications - at all. The SDK came a lot later and is their admission to the user base, their compromise. Apple even lets you take away 70% while you have to do nothing - no thing! - to promote your app and still reach millions of potential buyers.

If you&#039;re amont the user base that wants the degree of control over your iDevice an Android handset offers, then you&#039;re a tech savy geek (don&#039;t deny it!). And if you are, applying a jailbreak to your device shouldn&#039;t be that much of a problem. Afraid of voiding your warranty? Go take out an insurance instead of buying AppleCare  - you&#039;ll have your ass covered even if you sink your iPhone in the loo, and it&#039;s just a few bucks a month.

Sorry Mr. Bray, I don&#039;t see your point. Except the whining of a sulking company whose Google Voice app has been axed from the AppStore.

Do no evil? Yeah, right Mr. Data Kraken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d sympathise with Bray if Apple was putting the same regulations on surfing the web with their iDevices. Even -if- Apple is keeping the app developers on a short leash, it&#8217;s their good right. It&#8217;s their device, it&#8217;s their AppStore, it&#8217;s their playground.</p>
<p>You can still surf the web freely with your iDevice. If you want smut, there&#8217;s a phlethora of XXX sites out there, specifically made for mobile devices. If you want to bypass the AppStore, go develop a web app. There&#8217;s plenty of frameworks out there, use them.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget: When the iPhone initially came to be, Apple did not intend for it to run 3rd party applications &#8211; at all. The SDK came a lot later and is their admission to the user base, their compromise. Apple even lets you take away 70% while you have to do nothing &#8211; no thing! &#8211; to promote your app and still reach millions of potential buyers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re amont the user base that wants the degree of control over your iDevice an Android handset offers, then you&#8217;re a tech savy geek (don&#8217;t deny it!). And if you are, applying a jailbreak to your device shouldn&#8217;t be that much of a problem. Afraid of voiding your warranty? Go take out an insurance instead of buying AppleCare  &#8211; you&#8217;ll have your ass covered even if you sink your iPhone in the loo, and it&#8217;s just a few bucks a month.</p>
<p>Sorry Mr. Bray, I don&#8217;t see your point. Except the whining of a sulking company whose Google Voice app has been axed from the AppStore.</p>
<p>Do no evil? Yeah, right Mr. Data Kraken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kontra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kontra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has declared itself as the champion of the &quot;open web&quot; while maintaining a moat around its cashcows, search and advertising, which it guards in the most un-open way possible. Google funnels billions from its  &lt;em&gt;proprietary and closed&lt;/em&gt; businesses into a systematic effort to commoditize myriad industries with &lt;em&gt;free&lt;/em&gt; products to lure users into its perfectly commercial sphere of personal-data-for-advertising-dollars exchange. That Google has been able to persuade the technorati to swallow this under the glow of &#039;open web&#039; is all the more remarkable.
[...]
At the start of the iPod/iTunes ascendancy, Microsoft executives and &quot;advocates&quot; bitterly attacked Apple for not &quot;opening up&quot; its digital media ecosystem to competing interests, incredulously insisting that Apple should also offer various &lt;em&gt;proprietary&lt;/em&gt; Windows formats! This from a company that shafted its &lt;em&gt;own partners&lt;/em&gt; by killing the laughably named PlaysForSure media format to introduce its own non-licensed, proprietary Zune system. Apparently, &quot;open&quot; platforms are wonderful as long as they help fuel the platform originator&#039;s &lt;em&gt;proprietary&lt;/em&gt; cashcows. Windows then, Android now. That the latter is open source may be technically interesting but strategically insignificant.

More in:

Microsoft passes the &quot;choice&quot; bludgeon against Apple to Google
http://counternotions.com/2010/03/16/choice/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has declared itself as the champion of the &#8220;open web&#8221; while maintaining a moat around its cashcows, search and advertising, which it guards in the most un-open way possible. Google funnels billions from its  <em>proprietary and closed</em> businesses into a systematic effort to commoditize myriad industries with <em>free</em> products to lure users into its perfectly commercial sphere of personal-data-for-advertising-dollars exchange. That Google has been able to persuade the technorati to swallow this under the glow of &#8216;open web&#8217; is all the more remarkable.<br />
[...]<br />
At the start of the iPod/iTunes ascendancy, Microsoft executives and &#8220;advocates&#8221; bitterly attacked Apple for not &#8220;opening up&#8221; its digital media ecosystem to competing interests, incredulously insisting that Apple should also offer various <em>proprietary</em> Windows formats! This from a company that shafted its <em>own partners</em> by killing the laughably named PlaysForSure media format to introduce its own non-licensed, proprietary Zune system. Apparently, &#8220;open&#8221; platforms are wonderful as long as they help fuel the platform originator&#8217;s <em>proprietary</em> cashcows. Windows then, Android now. That the latter is open source may be technically interesting but strategically insignificant.</p>
<p>More in:</p>
<p>Microsoft passes the &#8220;choice&#8221; bludgeon against Apple to Google<br />
<a href="http://counternotions.com/2010/03/16/choice/" rel="nofollow">http://counternotions.com/2010/03/16/choice/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no issue with the control of the API or the restrictions apple choice to place on them (although I&#039;d love access to the SMS API to at least compose a message), I have no issue with the apple store.

I take issue to not been able to distribute any apps I develop to whom I choose.

While this might seem like a small issue, it is a major draw back to the platform as a whole.

I have several app ideas that a small community of users would like to have, but because of the nature of the distribution system, I won&#039;t write them (as they simply don&#039;t have a place in that market place).

Think about small-medium businesses, who would like to develop a custom app that would suit their individual businesses and plugin into their existing infrastructure.  These kind of apps have no place on the store, but there is simply no easy way to get around it (you need to be a company with more then 500 employees if you want the ability to follow this path).

What about 3rd party libraries?  Instead of been able to purchase pre-compiled libraries (like most other platforms) and use them within your code, you have to purchase the source code (generally a much more expensive prospect) or (re-)develop the solution all over again (another expensive prospect).  (Apple insists on all the source code as part of the submission process).

I&#039;m all for apple been able to check out my code, I&#039;d actually be really happy to have some sort of certification attached to my app, so people know at least it&#039;s been through some sort of &quot;check&quot; by apple (but given the issues of the current submission process, that doesn&#039;t actually mean lot).

All I really want to see, is the ability to distribute my own apps without the need to go through the app store.  I have no issue paying for the dev libraries (although Microsoft just released there&#039;s for free), I have no issue with having to have my code signed, I just take exception at the need to have to use apple&#039;s market place for apps that just don&#039;t belong there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no issue with the control of the API or the restrictions apple choice to place on them (although I&#8217;d love access to the SMS API to at least compose a message), I have no issue with the apple store.</p>
<p>I take issue to not been able to distribute any apps I develop to whom I choose.</p>
<p>While this might seem like a small issue, it is a major draw back to the platform as a whole.</p>
<p>I have several app ideas that a small community of users would like to have, but because of the nature of the distribution system, I won&#8217;t write them (as they simply don&#8217;t have a place in that market place).</p>
<p>Think about small-medium businesses, who would like to develop a custom app that would suit their individual businesses and plugin into their existing infrastructure.  These kind of apps have no place on the store, but there is simply no easy way to get around it (you need to be a company with more then 500 employees if you want the ability to follow this path).</p>
<p>What about 3rd party libraries?  Instead of been able to purchase pre-compiled libraries (like most other platforms) and use them within your code, you have to purchase the source code (generally a much more expensive prospect) or (re-)develop the solution all over again (another expensive prospect).  (Apple insists on all the source code as part of the submission process).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for apple been able to check out my code, I&#8217;d actually be really happy to have some sort of certification attached to my app, so people know at least it&#8217;s been through some sort of &#8220;check&#8221; by apple (but given the issues of the current submission process, that doesn&#8217;t actually mean lot).</p>
<p>All I really want to see, is the ability to distribute my own apps without the need to go through the app store.  I have no issue paying for the dev libraries (although Microsoft just released there&#8217;s for free), I have no issue with having to have my code signed, I just take exception at the need to have to use apple&#8217;s market place for apps that just don&#8217;t belong there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/03/15/googleapple-feud-gets-more-impassioned-personal/#comment-383247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=42400#comment-383247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you but I think the end result of Apple controlling the apps is beneficial to the iPhone ecosystem. It makes sense to only allow applications that are not harmful. Of course removing some application from app store because Apple doesn&#039;t like them is very ridiculous. I am not talking about that.   What I am talking about is that most people want their phone to just work. They don&#039;t want to worry about how I use it may break it or what app I install on it will damage it. Seriously guys, isn&#039;t it funny that you have to find and remove viruses on your phone? I think the idea that the computers should be problem free for everyone is a great idea and apple pursuing that dream.

Open system? Google open sources andriod because it was the only way for it to compete in this market. They never do that with their search engine. Why can&#039;t we write plugins for Google Search engine? 

Anyway, I think one thing that apple could do is to officially allow the jailbreaking or something similar but, if you chose to jailbreak (or whatever apple calls it) your iPhone or iPad then you are on your own. There is not warranty and there will be not update. You are responsible for all the damages and costs that it makes. They do it all the time in hardware. If you open your computer you will lose your warranty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you but I think the end result of Apple controlling the apps is beneficial to the iPhone ecosystem. It makes sense to only allow applications that are not harmful. Of course removing some application from app store because Apple doesn&#8217;t like them is very ridiculous. I am not talking about that.   What I am talking about is that most people want their phone to just work. They don&#8217;t want to worry about how I use it may break it or what app I install on it will damage it. Seriously guys, isn&#8217;t it funny that you have to find and remove viruses on your phone? I think the idea that the computers should be problem free for everyone is a great idea and apple pursuing that dream.</p>
<p>Open system? Google open sources andriod because it was the only way for it to compete in this market. They never do that with their search engine. Why can&#8217;t we write plugins for Google Search engine? </p>
<p>Anyway, I think one thing that apple could do is to officially allow the jailbreaking or something similar but, if you chose to jailbreak (or whatever apple calls it) your iPhone or iPad then you are on your own. There is not warranty and there will be not update. You are responsible for all the damages and costs that it makes. They do it all the time in hardware. If you open your computer you will lose your warranty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
