7 Comments

Summary:

There was lots of buzz not too long ago about Apple trying to get into the streaming music service, and moving that content to the cloud to compete with services like Pandora and others who seem to be taking some of the wind out of iTunes’ […]

moviesinthecloud_thumb

There was lots of buzz not too long ago about Apple trying to get into the streaming music service, and moving that content to the cloud to compete with services like Pandora and others who seem to be taking some of the wind out of iTunes’ sails. Now, it seems like music wasn’t the only thing the Mac maker’s been planning on moving to the cloud.

According to CNET’s sources, Apple has been in talks with major film studios about allowing iTunes customers to store their movie purchases in the cloud using the company’s servers. Add that to its possible plans to stream television and music, and you’ve got a very attractive combo for users who are getting tired of having to clear off hard drive space every few weeks.

Not only would the plan see the reduction of used HD space, which isn’t a problem for people who just want to watch something once and then delete it, but it will also allow any authorized Internet connected device to access and stream the content automatically, without the need to transfer or convert it first. In theory, then, any device with iTunes on it should be able to access the movies, including Apple’s upcoming iPad.

As details of these talks continue to emerge, it’s clear where Apple thinks the future of personal electronic devices is headed, and the popularity of streaming services like Internet radio and the Xbox’s 1080p streaming HD movie rentals suggest that Cupertino is right on the money. CNET’s source said of Apple, “[b]asically, they want to eliminate the hard drive.”

The barriers in the way of getting studios to buy in are fairly steep, at least by Apple’s standards. Reportedly, Hollywood won’t sign any deals that could see the content purchased by iTunes users limited in terms of playback to Apple devices and software. That means that for film studios to feel comfortable authorizing cloud storage, the media would have to be able to be viewed on whatever device the customer chooses, say, for instance, on a Microsoft phone and/or media player.

It’s not a deal I see Apple making, although I’m still not entirely sure that Hollywood will actually force things to go that way. For one thing, the movie studios currently allow Apple to distribute their films in Apple’s proprietary format, which makes it at least incredibly inconvenient to play it on other devices. A switch to streaming might temporarily make it impossible instead of just difficult, but I honestly don’t think iTunes customers are all that interested in playing content purchased in the iTunes store on their Nokia devices, or they’d buy from somewhere else, like Amazon.

Apple must be getting some positive indicators from these media companies, or it wouldn’t continue going around and trying to sweet-talk others into getting in on the deal. I’d say it’s a good bet that everyone’s waiting for one of the others to jump before following suit. Or for the iPad to launch so that they can gauge the consumer reach of Apple’s new wonder device.

I’m still someone who likes the option of storing my media locally, since I can’t shake the admittedly paranoid thought that one day any media I only have streaming access to could go offline forever, leaving me with nothing to show for all the money I’ve spent over the years. Still, the idea of having remote access to any movie or music all the time via any device with a network connection is definitely an attractive one. But even if that does come to pass, the question of Apple’s server reliability will inevitably come up. MobileMe took well over a year to reach a level of stability I’m comfortable with. How long would all-media streaming take to adjust?

Related GigaOM Pro Research: Do Consumers Care Where Their Content Is Stored?

  1. What a radical shift though! My first laptop was in 2001 and I saved for an 80gb hard drive because the iBook only had 10gbs of storage and I couldn’t store iTunes data locally.

    Over the years I started saving and storing more content TONS of content. Now I have over 5 terabytes of storage across two notebooks, an iMac and a Drobo. it’s just crazy that after all of this “collection” it’s all shifting (9 years later) to storing everything in the cloud. I’m still against it but it’ll make devices like the iPad and iPhone better for consumers.

    Share
  2. Cloud computer is DOA for consumers.

    The reason? Bandwidth caps being implemented by ISP’s.

    ‘Nough said.

    Share
  3. But will Apple also allow us to store backup copies of the books we buy from the iBookstore in the cloud. I’d hate to see my entire ebook library disappear with a crashed hard drive and I’d dislike the hassle of moving the library over every time I upgrade my computer.

    Share
  4. This is going to be the future for small companies! I can see it already

    Share
  5. Until we see a lift in the attitudes of ISP’s & mobile providers (data caps and restricted bandwidths) is still only going to suit a small number of people (although that might be all they need).

    I have enough issues with my internet data limit at home without streaming content as well.

    I also, would prefer the option of using the cloud as a backup and “authorized” sharing of content, rather then an isolated streaming solution. If they provided both (ie I could stream to my phone and download the content to my media player) then I be highly interested.

    As said, the other drawback is going to be the “Apple” only mechanism. We are rapidly heading back to the closed systems of the 80′s & 90′s that open source fought so hard to break out of.

    Hard to say, but for me, I’ll still be buying most of my content on disk for the foreseeable future…not to say that in principle it’s not a good idea, but I’m afraid we’ll all end up with a model that Microsoft tried in the 80′s & 90′s. Not a move that we need.

    Share
    1. Do you realize your apparent context is a distinct minority?

      Most folks aren’t affected by current ISP caps. Users relying on wireless for Web access? Sure. But, not the average home-based user.

      And fears about the Apple-only mechanism? What are you ever talking about? The mechanism is iTunes and the only direction that has gone is multi-platform.

      Apple didn’t achieve the sort of corporate success it has in the Age of the iPod by limiting access to products or services.

      The adverts for the iPad will start in about 10 days – and another concept new to most Americans [and eventually folks in other lands] will start piquing attention in between segments of the most popular TV shows offered.

      It will all be delivered by iTunes.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post