<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backupify Gets Funded &#8212; But Will You Use It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacques]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;...it’s likely to take an even bigger one to back up data that’s already in the cloud with another cloud-based service.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, you have your data on some site in the cloud, there is no user back-up solution (only the in-house server back-ups - and we all know how well that works...), but then storing it on another cloud-server would become an issue?
Isn&#039;t the basic principle of back-up &#039;the more the merrier&#039;? A back-up in the cloud is always better than none. True, it would be ironic if your back-up inadvertently would reside on the same server as your live-site - but you pay that back-up service to avoid so? Does S3 look into that as well?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but sounds like flawed logic to me.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;it’s likely to take an even bigger one to back up data that’s already in the cloud with another cloud-based service.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, you have your data on some site in the cloud, there is no user back-up solution (only the in-house server back-ups &#8211; and we all know how well that works&#8230;), but then storing it on another cloud-server would become an issue?<br />
Isn&#8217;t the basic principle of back-up &#8216;the more the merrier&#8217;? A back-up in the cloud is always better than none. True, it would be ironic if your back-up inadvertently would reside on the same server as your live-site &#8211; but you pay that back-up service to avoid so? Does S3 look into that as well?</p>
<p>Sorry, but sounds like flawed logic to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why GigaOm is right (and wrong) about Backupify</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why GigaOm is right (and wrong) about Backupify]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Monday, Mathew Ingram over at GigaOm offered his reaction to Backupify getting VC funding. Put simply, Ingram was skeptical about the future of our company. He made some fair points. We [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monday, Mathew Ingram over at GigaOm offered his reaction to Backupify getting VC funding. Put simply, Ingram was skeptical about the future of our company. He made some fair points. We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Congrats to Rob and Backupify for raising funding after successfully rebranding &amp; repositioning themselves. I&#039;m frankly not sure how consumers will get comfortable storing data in the cloud, altho it is an inevitable trend. Even the US govt requires federal agencies to have a cloud strategy (I know, not necessarily an endorsement):  http://bit.ly/bhykBx. The best analogy I can think of is streaming vs. downloaded music: why waste your time and disk space downloading music to own, when you can simply access whatever you want to listen to on any device for a lower cost, a la Spotify? But it&#039;s taken consumers years to adjust to this concept.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shameless plug: in addition to backing up in the cloud, you might want to check out Silentale.com, a social CRM, currently in free beta. Silentale automatically provides you with a 360° view of the people you know, including your conversation history with them, by consolidating &amp; indexing your contacts, messages &amp; attachments from emails, social &amp; business networks into a single, searchable archive. Shannon from Silentale.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats to Rob and Backupify for raising funding after successfully rebranding &#038; repositioning themselves. I&#8217;m frankly not sure how consumers will get comfortable storing data in the cloud, altho it is an inevitable trend. Even the US govt requires federal agencies to have a cloud strategy (I know, not necessarily an endorsement):  <a href="http://bit.ly/bhykBx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bhykBx</a>. The best analogy I can think of is streaming vs. downloaded music: why waste your time and disk space downloading music to own, when you can simply access whatever you want to listen to on any device for a lower cost, a la Spotify? But it&#8217;s taken consumers years to adjust to this concept.</p>
<p>Shameless plug: in addition to backing up in the cloud, you might want to check out Silentale.com, a social CRM, currently in free beta. Silentale automatically provides you with a 360° view of the people you know, including your conversation history with them, by consolidating &#038; indexing your contacts, messages &#038; attachments from emails, social &#038; business networks into a single, searchable archive. Shannon from Silentale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There is another option to backup data to cloud storage powered by Amazon S3. Check out CloudBerry Backup http://cloudberrydrive.com/ . It is one time fee and the rest what you pay for Amazon S3&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another option to backup data to cloud storage powered by Amazon S3. Check out CloudBerry Backup <a href="http://cloudberrydrive.com/" rel="nofollow">http://cloudberrydrive.com/</a> . It is one time fee and the rest what you pay for Amazon S3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinsoler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martinsoler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;As a photographer I am interested. Would need to work out how it would work though as GBs go fast with raw images and a few tiffs. But having an online backup of my stuff would definitely make me feel safer.
http://martinsoler.com/
PS: Nice cloud shot that&#039;s got to be HDR.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a photographer I am interested. Would need to work out how it would work though as GBs go fast with raw images and a few tiffs. But having an online backup of my stuff would definitely make me feel safer.<br />
<a href="http://martinsoler.com/" rel="nofollow">http://martinsoler.com/</a><br />
PS: Nice cloud shot that&#8217;s got to be HDR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a great point, Dilip.  Many web services use Amazon for at least some of their storage and hosting, which of course is already redundantly backed up by Amazon.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Dilip.  Many web services use Amazon for at least some of their storage and hosting, which of course is already redundantly backed up by Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;No fair, Rob -- you work there  :-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No fair, Rob &#8212; you work there  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a good point -- thanks, Rob.  It got a lot of attention though, and it seemed to become a lightning rod for people&#039;s fears about losing control over their data in the cloud.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point &#8212; thanks, Rob.  It got a lot of attention though, and it seemed to become a lightning rod for people&#8217;s fears about losing control over their data in the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;yes please&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/16/backupify-gets-funded-but-will-you-use-it/#comment-240876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99433#comment-240876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi HSK,
Please note that we are new, which is why we only offer XML right now.  Longer term we will offer many other ways to view your data, it just takes a while to build all of that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Rob&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi HSK,<br />
Please note that we are new, which is why we only offer XML right now.  Longer term we will offer many other ways to view your data, it just takes a while to build all of that.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
