<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the WAC Is Whack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The WAC Dream Lives on Smart&#8217;s Netphone: Tech News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-587925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The WAC Dream Lives on Smart&#8217;s Netphone: Tech News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-587925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] started out as a far-fetched dream &#8212; to create a unified app platform that can run on any device, operating system and carrier &#8212; is finally coming to life, though its long-term prospects are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] started out as a far-fetched dream &#8212; to create a unified app platform that can run on any device, operating system and carrier &#8212; is finally coming to life, though its long-term prospects are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do We Need a Global App Store for Feature Phones?: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-300536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do We Need a Global App Store for Feature Phones?: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-300536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Applications Community was first announced earlier this year at the Mobile World Congress event. We covered the news of this largely carrier-based organization back then, and after browsing a PDF of the specification today, I&#8217;m inclined to agree with my colleague [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Applications Community was first announced earlier this year at the Mobile World Congress event. We covered the news of this largely carrier-based organization back then, and after browsing a PDF of the specification today, I&#8217;m inclined to agree with my colleague [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh God! Yet Another Lame Carrier-Backed Mobile OS: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-276963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh God! Yet Another Lame Carrier-Backed Mobile OS: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-276963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] LiMo Foundation. Yeah, even I thought it had chances of being a success, but man, was I wrong. The chances of the Wholesale Applications Community (WAC), another industry-wide effort, succeeding range from zero to oh, I don’t know&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LiMo Foundation. Yeah, even I thought it had chances of being a success, but man, was I wrong. The chances of the Wholesale Applications Community (WAC), another industry-wide effort, succeeding range from zero to oh, I don’t know&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Applications - February 17, 2010</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Observations: Applications - February 17, 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Why the WAC Is Whack [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why the WAC Is Whack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interfaSys</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[interfaSys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s not forget that we will soon be able to write Flash apps that will work on all platforms...
I for one welcome the effort of carriers to help developers bring out apps for many different platforms. Should make it much easier.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that we will soon be able to write Flash apps that will work on all platforms&#8230;<br />
I for one welcome the effort of carriers to help developers bring out apps for many different platforms. Should make it much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s also this thing called HTML…&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also this thing called HTML…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Agree in tone with the article and comments (about write once run anywhere). However there are secondary issues here - the carriers also want to make use of network intelligence to &quot;move up the stack&quot; from being dumb pipe providers.  I wrote a bunch here on how they will attempt this - important stuff http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree in tone with the article and comments (about write once run anywhere). However there are secondary issues here &#8211; the carriers also want to make use of network intelligence to &#8220;move up the stack&#8221; from being dumb pipe providers.  I wrote a bunch here on how they will attempt this &#8211; important stuff <a href="http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh" rel="nofollow">http://stevecheney.posterous.com/twenty-four-companies-unite-to-kill-apple-huh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;well there is something called j2me (java mobile edition)...which is there since last 5 years ....looks like move to pressure apple&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well there is something called j2me (java mobile edition)&#8230;which is there since last 5 years &#8230;.looks like move to pressure apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The creation of a lowest common denominator standard to allow apps to run on all platforms will not work: Once all the OS variations plus all the hardware variations are taken into account application usability will be appalling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If we are going to get to a world where mobile applications run across a broad mix of hardware and software platforms then we will need a hypervisor for mobiles to hide all the variability from the applications. So far there has been much talk of mobile hypervisors but little action.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing the App Store has proven is the demand for mobile applications and that a de-facto standard (iPhone) is better than nothing. That leaves the rest of the industry with a decision: Create real cross platform compatibility or accept that mobile apps will be the sole preserve of a small number of de-facto standards – Apple plus maybe RIM/BlackBerry for business apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Martin Ingram (AppSense)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creation of a lowest common denominator standard to allow apps to run on all platforms will not work: Once all the OS variations plus all the hardware variations are taken into account application usability will be appalling.</p>
<p>If we are going to get to a world where mobile applications run across a broad mix of hardware and software platforms then we will need a hypervisor for mobiles to hide all the variability from the applications. So far there has been much talk of mobile hypervisors but little action.</p>
<p>One thing the App Store has proven is the demand for mobile applications and that a de-facto standard (iPhone) is better than nothing. That leaves the rest of the industry with a decision: Create real cross platform compatibility or accept that mobile apps will be the sole preserve of a small number of de-facto standards – Apple plus maybe RIM/BlackBerry for business apps.</p>
<p>Martin Ingram (AppSense)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/why-the-wac-is-whack/#comment-240774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=99325#comment-240774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Haven&#039;t heard this story before? Didn&#039;t NeXT try it, and PowerPC, and OpenDoc, and...  As long as size-obsessed, hyper-competitive men continue to run companies purely on the basis of short-term I&#039;ll-be-gone/You&#039;ll-be-gone self-interest rather than long-term mutual-interest, such advances are unlikely to succeed.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t heard this story before? Didn&#8217;t NeXT try it, and PowerPC, and OpenDoc, and&#8230;  As long as size-obsessed, hyper-competitive men continue to run companies purely on the basis of short-term I&#8217;ll-be-gone/You&#8217;ll-be-gone self-interest rather than long-term mutual-interest, such advances are unlikely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
