<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Doesn&#039;t Want to Be an ISP &#8212; It Wants to Be a Rabble-rouser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Your Town Get Google Fiber? Google&#8217;s Not Telling Yet.: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-551816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Did Your Town Get Google Fiber? Google&#8217;s Not Telling Yet.: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-551816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] about Google&#8217;s conversations with other municipalities, I&#8217;m still eager to see how the search giant can shake up the broadband access business. Given the lack of competition, the tussle over network neutrality and the need for fatter and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Google&#8217;s conversations with other municipalities, I&#8217;m still eager to see how the search giant can shake up the broadband access business. Given the lack of competition, the tussle over network neutrality and the need for fatter and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Begins Using Its Planned Fiber Networkto Flog ISPs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Begins Using Its Planned Fiber Networkto Flog ISPs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] in order to show people and governments what a modern broadband network should cost&#8211; possibly lighting a fire under ISPs who are reluctant to upgrade their networks. Its new site gives people and municipalities a match [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in order to show people and governments what a modern broadband network should cost&#8211; possibly lighting a fire under ISPs who are reluctant to upgrade their networks. Its new site gives people and municipalities a match [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey ISPs, Google Wants to Share Its Fiber Network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hey ISPs, Google Wants to Share Its Fiber Network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] story by BroadbandBreakfast.com. The publication quotes a project manager in charge of the program (whom we&#8217;ve also interviewed before), as saying: “We definitely inviting the Comcasts, the AT&amp;T service providers to work with us [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story by BroadbandBreakfast.com. The publication quotes a project manager in charge of the program (whom we&#8217;ve also interviewed before), as saying: “We definitely inviting the Comcasts, the AT&amp;T service providers to work with us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google isn&#039;t going to change how they operate.  In response to Blandy&#039;s &quot;Google doesn’t make cell phones. They make an OS for cell phones.&quot;  She is absolutely right.  Google loves to work in the background, making deals with others in order to make their own profits.  With that, you all should read this article:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I, like many others, believe this hits the nail on the head.  It&#039;s how Google has always operated.  It makes perfect sense.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google isn&#8217;t going to change how they operate.  In response to Blandy&#8217;s &#8220;Google doesn’t make cell phones. They make an OS for cell phones.&#8221;  She is absolutely right.  Google loves to work in the background, making deals with others in order to make their own profits.  With that, you all should read this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070119_001510.html</a></p>
<p>I, like many others, believe this hits the nail on the head.  It&#8217;s how Google has always operated.  It makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think all that Google wants to do is goose existing ISP providers into upgrading horribly shoddy crap they have. They now have no incentive to do so and will not unless shot in the foot (oh, I&#039;m sorry, until the &#039;Invisible Hand&#039; does something or other...). Sigh. Google is probably only looking at sites that already have a huge investment in what is now black cable, ie all of that crap that the dot.boom.busts laid down in the 80/90&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all that Google wants to do is goose existing ISP providers into upgrading horribly shoddy crap they have. They now have no incentive to do so and will not unless shot in the foot (oh, I&#8217;m sorry, until the &#8216;Invisible Hand&#8217; does something or other&#8230;). Sigh. Google is probably only looking at sites that already have a huge investment in what is now black cable, ie all of that crap that the dot.boom.busts laid down in the 80/90&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Deadline Is Tomorrow But Google Fiber Is Already Changing Towns &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Deadline Is Tomorrow But Google Fiber Is Already Changing Towns &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] could accrue to municipalities through a more connected and engaged citizenry and hopefully through showing the U.S. what it means to have a truly open fiber network that could boost competition for broadband connectivity. From Austin&#8217;s FAQs on the topic: [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could accrue to municipalities through a more connected and engaged citizenry and hopefully through showing the U.S. what it means to have a truly open fiber network that could boost competition for broadband connectivity. From Austin&#8217;s FAQs on the topic: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Hill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn Hill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Minnie Ingersoll is one of countless examples of why Google is so often referred to as &quot;the giant&quot;. Google Fiber for Communities is an opportunity of a lifetime. Longview, Texas hopes to welcome Google with open arms in what will become an invaluable community partnership.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnie Ingersoll is one of countless examples of why Google is so often referred to as &#8220;the giant&#8221;. Google Fiber for Communities is an opportunity of a lifetime. Longview, Texas hopes to welcome Google with open arms in what will become an invaluable community partnership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Might be the IPTV Platform of the Future</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Might be the IPTV Platform of the Future]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] speculate that Viacom may fear a Google-backed IPTV solution that is based off of YouTube.  Given Google&#8217;s recent gigabit broadband announcement and the Google/gigabit fan-frenzy that ensued, that may not be an unreasonable fear.  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speculate that Viacom may fear a Google-backed IPTV solution that is based off of YouTube.  Given Google&#8217;s recent gigabit broadband announcement and the Google/gigabit fan-frenzy that ensued, that may not be an unreasonable fear.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Kansas Now On the Map</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Kansas Now On the Map]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] are going to win and the country may have been put back on the path to economic recovery with a single gigabit-sized gauntlet thrown down by the town formerly known as Topeka.  Photo Credit: [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are going to win and the country may have been put back on the path to economic recovery with a single gigabit-sized gauntlet thrown down by the town formerly known as Topeka.  Photo Credit: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google, le touche à tout &#8230; &#171; Kapecom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google, le touche à tout &#8230; &#171; Kapecom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] le monde, juste à quelques villes et villages peut-être car ce projet est expérimental. Il ne durera pas indéfiniment et il aurait pour but premier de faire bouger les FAI américains qui stagnent sur une distribution [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] le monde, juste à quelques villes et villages peut-être car ce projet est expérimental. Il ne durera pas indéfiniment et il aurait pour but premier de faire bouger les FAI américains qui stagnent sur une distribution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blandy Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blandy Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google doesn&#039;t make cell phones. They make an OS for cell phones.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t make cell phones. They make an OS for cell phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane Jasper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane Jasper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Brett,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You seem to be missing the point about an open infrastructure. Independent ISPs should be cheered by efforts to build fiber that they are not locked out of. A model like Europe - where all carriers can share the common fiber plant, can&#039;t be a bad thing (unless you are the incumbent who is not innovating today.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Dane J.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,</p>
<p>You seem to be missing the point about an open infrastructure. Independent ISPs should be cheered by efforts to build fiber that they are not locked out of. A model like Europe &#8211; where all carriers can share the common fiber plant, can&#8217;t be a bad thing (unless you are the incumbent who is not innovating today.)</p>
<p>-Dane J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolidNode &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roundup: Google’s Broadband Experiment</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SolidNode &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roundup: Google’s Broadband Experiment]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] home, and thus enabling 1gigabit per second connectivity to arrive faster. Stacey Higginbotham from GigaOm has additional details from Google&#8217;s product manager for alternative access Minnie Ingersol, [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] home, and thus enabling 1gigabit per second connectivity to arrive faster. Stacey Higginbotham from GigaOm has additional details from Google&#8217;s product manager for alternative access Minnie Ingersol, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Minnie, I and my fellow independent ISPs will fight your proposal to the death wherever it threatens to rear its ugly head. Your rapacious, corrosive, corrupting corporate monopoly has no right to harm hard working local businesses and the communities they serve. Be warned: we will oppose you, and we will WIN.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnie, I and my fellow independent ISPs will fight your proposal to the death wherever it threatens to rear its ugly head. Your rapacious, corrosive, corrupting corporate monopoly has no right to harm hard working local businesses and the communities they serve. Be warned: we will oppose you, and we will WIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Mark, as usual your comments are disingenuous. I operate a small, independent, competitive, rural ISP: a true, hard working local business that creates jobs and serves my community. We have, and welcome, fair competition. But Google&#039;s aim is to be anticompetitive. What Google wants to see is broadband as a monopoly municipal utility, run at a loss that is made up via taxpayer dollars, with all commercial ISPs dead and gone. This would be great for Google (because it has a powerful lobbying engine and could, via regulatory capture, set all the rules for the network -- as it is now trying to do at the FCC). But it would be bad for consumers. There would be no choice of carriers, because the taxpayer-subsidized one would drive the ones that had to earn their keep out of business. And with the end of competition would come the end of innovation. Great for Google, bad for everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, as usual your comments are disingenuous. I operate a small, independent, competitive, rural ISP: a true, hard working local business that creates jobs and serves my community. We have, and welcome, fair competition. But Google&#8217;s aim is to be anticompetitive. What Google wants to see is broadband as a monopoly municipal utility, run at a loss that is made up via taxpayer dollars, with all commercial ISPs dead and gone. This would be great for Google (because it has a powerful lobbying engine and could, via regulatory capture, set all the rules for the network &#8212; as it is now trying to do at the FCC). But it would be bad for consumers. There would be no choice of carriers, because the taxpayer-subsidized one would drive the ones that had to earn their keep out of business. And with the end of competition would come the end of innovation. Great for Google, bad for everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/10/google-doesnt-want-to-be-an-isp-it-wants-to-be-a-rabble-rouser/#comment-239782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=98172#comment-239782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Because you work for a sleepy incumbent telco, Brett?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How exactly is introducing a new service anticompetitive?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you work for a sleepy incumbent telco, Brett?</p>
<p>How exactly is introducing a new service anticompetitive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

