<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why On-the-Fly Mobile Translation Technology Won&#039;t Happen Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Translation Technology &#171; My blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/#comment-239203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Translation Technology &#171; My blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=97481#comment-239203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Here is the article: http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/ [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the article: <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Okko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/08/why-on-the-fly-mobile-translation-technology-wont-happen-soon/#comment-239202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=97481#comment-239202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This will be very interesting to follow!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All technologies involved here are error-prone. Overcoming their limitation will warrant some kind of reinvention of the wheel that will be impressive to behold if it works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simply employing current Speech-to-Text output in conjunction with machine translation alone won&#039;t cut it (even with automatic speech recognition accuracy rates well in the eighties.) Translating clean text into another language is a noisy channel problem and while there are machine translation approaches that work with &quot;broken&quot; input, there is no wholesale solution that systematically models speech recognition errors. The problem then becomes semantic one (not statistics, which Google exceeds at).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In any case, Google&#039;s solution may just blow our minds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google buying Nuance I suspect is unlikely, not only because of company value, but also as the latter consists of a whole range of product and professional service groups (beyond the obvious speech technology data/expertise) that Google will not be interested in, but which will be hard to break out of the overall structure.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be very interesting to follow!</p>
<p>All technologies involved here are error-prone. Overcoming their limitation will warrant some kind of reinvention of the wheel that will be impressive to behold if it works.</p>
<p>Simply employing current Speech-to-Text output in conjunction with machine translation alone won&#8217;t cut it (even with automatic speech recognition accuracy rates well in the eighties.) Translating clean text into another language is a noisy channel problem and while there are machine translation approaches that work with &#8220;broken&#8221; input, there is no wholesale solution that systematically models speech recognition errors. The problem then becomes semantic one (not statistics, which Google exceeds at).</p>
<p>In any case, Google&#8217;s solution may just blow our minds.</p>
<p>Google buying Nuance I suspect is unlikely, not only because of company value, but also as the latter consists of a whole range of product and professional service groups (beyond the obvious speech technology data/expertise) that Google will not be interested in, but which will be hard to break out of the overall structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

