<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG X20 Netbook With High-resolution Screen Poses for FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/05/lg-x20-netbook-with-high-resolution-screen-poses-for-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/05/lg-x20-netbook-with-high-resolution-screen-poses-for-fcc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtuous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/05/lg-x20-netbook-with-high-resolution-screen-poses-for-fcc/#comment-433324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Virtuous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=56286#comment-433324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Aren&#039;t the low screen resolutions on most netbooks due to artificial restrictions imposed by Microsoft and Intel? I thought these absurd rules were imposed to protect their much more profitable higher end products.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the low screen resolutions on most netbooks due to artificial restrictions imposed by Microsoft and Intel? I thought these absurd rules were imposed to protect their much more profitable higher end products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/05/lg-x20-netbook-with-high-resolution-screen-poses-for-fcc/#comment-433323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=56286#comment-433323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Note that there&#039;ll also be a version with a 1.83Ghz CPU.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that there&#8217;ll also be a version with a 1.83Ghz CPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscious</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/05/lg-x20-netbook-with-high-resolution-screen-poses-for-fcc/#comment-433322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luscious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=56286#comment-433322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sweet keyboard. Throw a N470 in there and a broadcom board and I&#039;m buying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve said for a long time that 1024x600 was subpar. 1280x800 or 1366x768 makes for a decent Windows experience, and won&#039;t interfere in your productivity either. Give that F11 key a rest ;)&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet keyboard. Throw a N470 in there and a broadcom board and I&#8217;m buying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said for a long time that 1024&#215;600 was subpar. 1280&#215;800 or 1366&#215;768 makes for a decent Windows experience, and won&#8217;t interfere in your productivity either. Give that F11 key a rest ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
