<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Grid 101: It&#039;s About Relationships, Not Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Arul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/#comment-30351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex Arul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50594#comment-30351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@katie - That makes sense. Because of the huge opportunity and the wide domain it encompasses, the last thing Utilities want is a Babel full of disparate technologies and solutions that do not or cannot cohabit well with other SG solutions. Naturally, the way to reduce the risk then, is to look forward to different consortia for wider solutions in the SG space.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A question though: Although you cite a $16 billion SG opportunity by 2015 in this article (probably by Lux Research???), elsewhere you quote a $21 billion figure by 2015 (probably by Pike Research???). I am just curious as to which figure has a wider acceptance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although the difference is a paltry (??) $5 billion, that is still more than what the US Government currently funds out of ARRA for the entire Smart Grid related investments :-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@katie &#8211; That makes sense. Because of the huge opportunity and the wide domain it encompasses, the last thing Utilities want is a Babel full of disparate technologies and solutions that do not or cannot cohabit well with other SG solutions. Naturally, the way to reduce the risk then, is to look forward to different consortia for wider solutions in the SG space.</p>
<p>A question though: Although you cite a $16 billion SG opportunity by 2015 in this article (probably by Lux Research???), elsewhere you quote a $21 billion figure by 2015 (probably by Pike Research???). I am just curious as to which figure has a wider acceptance.</p>
<p>Although the difference is a paltry (??) $5 billion, that is still more than what the US Government currently funds out of ARRA for the entire Smart Grid related investments :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smart Grid 101: It’s About Relationships, Not Technology</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/#comment-30350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Smart Grid 101: It’s About Relationships, Not Technology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50594#comment-30350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] via Smart Grid 101: It’s About Relationships, Not Technology. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Smart Grid 101: It’s About Relationships, Not Technology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Fehrenbacher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/#comment-30349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Fehrenbacher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50594#comment-30349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Elliott, agreed. Good luck.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Elliott, agreed. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Lemenager</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/02/02/smart-grid-101-its-about-relationships-not-technology/#comment-30348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott Lemenager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=50594#comment-30348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s opprotunity as well for start ups to partner with bigger companies!Combine forces and go after utilties.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s opprotunity as well for start ups to partner with bigger companies!Combine forces and go after utilties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
