<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Are the Network Virtual Appliances?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compiled Networks Aims to Link Clouds, Make Wi-Fi Mobile &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Compiled Networks Aims to Link Clouds, Make Wi-Fi Mobile &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] a seamless network can also run inside an appliance located inside a cloud, and virtually extend a data center&#8217;s Layer 2 Ethernet network to a cloud. In doing so it offers an IT operations person a level of security and control that they might not [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a seamless network can also run inside an appliance located inside a cloud, and virtually extend a data center&#8217;s Layer 2 Ethernet network to a cloud. In doing so it offers an IT operations person a level of security and control that they might not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eastwick Communications Client Coverage &#187; Vyatta featured on GigaOM/BusinessWeek: “Where Are the Network Virtual Appliances?”</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eastwick Communications Client Coverage &#187; Vyatta featured on GigaOM/BusinessWeek: “Where Are the Network Virtual Appliances?”]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] full article here  addthis_url = [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] full article here  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLP Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DLP Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The performance is adequate.  VM does not cause drop in performance, except for the HD access (where it drops 2-3x), so that the virtual appliances, that do not depend hard on the HD, are not affected.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The performance is adequate.  VM does not cause drop in performance, except for the HD access (where it drops 2-3x), so that the virtual appliances, that do not depend hard on the HD, are not affected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim St. Leger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim St. Leger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Is the performance of the virtual appliances that exist today adequate? How does it stack up against the traditional stand-alone box appliance HW solution?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Historically things that need to go &quot;faster&quot; tend to get their own dedicated solution (e.g. offload/accelerators), that is unless there&#039;s some disruptive technology that changes the game.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Virtual appliances may truly be needed as cloud/virtualization grows, but is that the only and best option? What if every underlying HW platform (e.g. datacenter servers) had these inherent capabilities?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the performance of the virtual appliances that exist today adequate? How does it stack up against the traditional stand-alone box appliance HW solution?</p>
<p>Historically things that need to go &#8220;faster&#8221; tend to get their own dedicated solution (e.g. offload/accelerators), that is unless there&#8217;s some disruptive technology that changes the game.</p>
<p>Virtual appliances may truly be needed as cloud/virtualization grows, but is that the only and best option? What if every underlying HW platform (e.g. datacenter servers) had these inherent capabilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@Allan HyTrust is used for a lot of things but on this topic it is used to differentiate network infrastructure appliances from application VMs. As an example an application admin could create, configure and reboot application VMs but not network switch VMs like the Cisco 1000V.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another thing I&#039;d like to see is strong hardware accelerator support with Vmotion, HA, etc for SSL/crypto and also for TPM keystores.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Allan HyTrust is used for a lot of things but on this topic it is used to differentiate network infrastructure appliances from application VMs. As an example an application admin could create, configure and reboot application VMs but not network switch VMs like the Cisco 1000V.</p>
<p>Another thing I&#8217;d like to see is strong hardware accelerator support with Vmotion, HA, etc for SSL/crypto and also for TPM keystores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Gerhart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Gerhart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Quick note: NetScaler VPX is available on XenServer and VMware ESX.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick note: NetScaler VPX is available on XenServer and VMware ESX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Leinwand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Leinwand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sajai - keep up the good fight at ParaScale.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sajai &#8211; keep up the good fight at ParaScale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Leinwand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Leinwand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Agreed - virtual network appliances need to be able to handle multiple VLANs and trunking. Let&#039;s bring on the high performance devices running multiple network appliances!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; virtual network appliances need to be able to handle multiple VLANs and trunking. Let&#8217;s bring on the high performance devices running multiple network appliances!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Leinwand</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Leinwand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the information. Have you used this virtual appliance and do you have any experience using this in production?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information. Have you used this virtual appliance and do you have any experience using this in production?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajai Krishnan, CEO, ParaScale</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sajai Krishnan, CEO, ParaScale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;IMO the big theme is that commodity hardware is going to be the norm going forward. Compute (as you pointed out), networking (VMs or Linux) seems to be seeing traction in that direction, and increasingly storage (VM or Linux). With ParaScale you can get file-storage(NAS) by ganging together commodity servers and their internal spinning disks (http://www.parascale.com/index.php/solutions/overview). No question, this is where the  world is going.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO the big theme is that commodity hardware is going to be the norm going forward. Compute (as you pointed out), networking (VMs or Linux) seems to be seeing traction in that direction, and increasingly storage (VM or Linux). With ParaScale you can get file-storage(NAS) by ganging together commodity servers and their internal spinning disks (<a href="http://www.parascale.com/index.php/solutions/overview" rel="nofollow">http://www.parascale.com/index.php/solutions/overview</a>). No question, this is where the  world is going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Could you comment on how this need for all network devices to have a virtual form factor square up with the efforts to standardize on IEEE 802.1Q variants (ah &amp; bg).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The notion there is that, esp. in an internal DC, instead of having a plethora of enforcement policies, these can still be managed fewer albeit high performance devices.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you comment on how this need for all network devices to have a virtual form factor square up with the efforts to standardize on IEEE 802.1Q variants (ah &#038; bg).</p>
<p>The notion there is that, esp. in an internal DC, instead of having a plethora of enforcement policies, these can still be managed fewer albeit high performance devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Are the Network Virtual Appliances? Hobbled By the Virtual Network, That&#8217;s Where&#8230; &#124; Rational Survivability</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where Are the Network Virtual Appliances? Hobbled By the Virtual Network, That&#8217;s Where&#8230; &#124; Rational Survivability]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Leinwand from GigaOm wrote a great article asking &#8220;Where are the network virtual appliances?&#8221; This was followed up by another excellent post by Rich [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leinwand from GigaOm wrote a great article asking &#8220;Where are the network virtual appliances?&#8221; This was followed up by another excellent post by Rich [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLP Guy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DLP Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Prevensys has Data Loss Prevention virtual appliances.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prevensys has Data Loss Prevention virtual appliances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krishna Sankar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;On second sentence, I meant coincidentally &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; confidently - blame it on the spellchecker!
Moderator ; Can you pl correct ?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second sentence, I meant coincidentally <em>not</em> confidently &#8211; blame it on the spellchecker!<br />
Moderator ; Can you pl correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna Sankar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krishna Sankar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yep, true indeed. Confidently, I had this as one of the essential features for Cloud TNG. Except for network services that need wire-speed, all others would move into the &quot;soft-appliance&quot; from factor. Naturally it is not a linear interpolation - the services need to be horizontally scalable, distributable and even inherit some of the protocols that is in the Cloud OS - like gossip, adjacency et al.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, true indeed. Confidently, I had this as one of the essential features for Cloud TNG. Except for network services that need wire-speed, all others would move into the &#8220;soft-appliance&#8221; from factor. Naturally it is not a linear interpolation &#8211; the services need to be horizontally scalable, distributable and even inherit some of the protocols that is in the Cloud OS &#8211; like gossip, adjacency et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloud 2.0/Cloud TNG/Cloud Reloaded &#8211; Top 5 &#171; My missives</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/29/where-are-the-network-virtual-appliances/#comment-238235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cloud 2.0/Cloud TNG/Cloud Reloaded &#8211; Top 5 &#171; My missives]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=92929#comment-238235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] 1] An interesting blog by Allan in GigaOm &#8220;Where are the Network Appliances?&#8221;. He ends the blog with a poignant statement &#8221; &#8230; networking architectures will change to [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1] An interesting blog by Allan in GigaOm &#8220;Where are the Network Appliances?&#8221;. He ends the blog with a poignant statement &#8221; &#8230; networking architectures will change to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

