We all pretty much knew it was happening, and Steve Jobs didn’t let us down: Apple introduced a tablet device called the iPad at today’s event in San Francisco. You can read a play-by-play of the unveiling on TheAppleBlog’s Twitter feed and check this post for […]

We all pretty much knew it was happening, and Steve Jobs didn’t let us down: Apple introduced a tablet device called the iPad at today’s event in San Francisco. You can read a play-by-play of the unveiling on TheAppleBlog’s Twitter feed and check this post for links to the complete GigaOM network coverage. Of course, the aspect that we we’re most interested in is: How good of a newteevee device is the iPad?

Video actually played a big role during the announcement, with Jobs saying that a new device only made sense if it was better at watching video, among other tasks, than current laptops and smartphones. Jobs also demoed watching YouTube in HD and playing movies and TV shows from the iTunes store. However, a small detail during the presentation revealed that the iPad won’t satisfy all your online video needs.

First, a few word about the specs: The iPad features a 9.7-inch IPS display. This type of LCD display technology features better viewing angles than your average desktop screen, which should help to make the iPad an in-your-lap kind of device. IPS is generally known to use a little more power than regular LCDs, but Jobs said that the iPad will still offer around 10 hours of video viewing on one charge. Apple will sell the tablet with 16-64 GB of Flash storage. That’s not that much for HD video, but it should suffice for the average user, especially given the fact that you’d only watch an iTunes rental once before deleting it. The iPad will have a 1Ghz processor that Apple developed in-house and presumably some powerful GPU working under the hood to make HD video work.

Now, what will be available in terms of video content? Obviously iTunes downloads, but also YouTube, and live video delivered through apps. One example for this was a demo by MLB.com, which combined full-screen live streams from games with advanced features like instant replay, information about the trajectory of every pitch and a choice of announcers.

One interesting aspect of the device was briefly shown during the presentation of the New York Times iPad app. The application seemed to have a similar look and feel as its iPhone counterpart, judging from photos available on various gadget blogs. However, videos were playable directly on the page, much like you would expect from a video embed on a web site. That’s not really so revolutionary for an online news offering, but it opens up a whole range of possibilities for adding video content to apps for magazines or even dictionaries.

Speaking of books: iPad owners will have access to the iBook app, which is essentially a Kindle-like e-book experience, but for a color display. Apple is using the ePub format for this. ePub is an open standard based on XML which theoretically would allow publishers to include multimedia files as well. However, no such capabilities were demoed on stage, and it’s unclear whether the iPad will actually support video integration in its e-books, because the iPad doesn’t support Flash.

Yes, no Flash on the iPad. There, I said it. Unlike Jobs, who tried really hard to avoid the subject on stage. Of course, maybe he shouldn’t have gone to the New York Times web site, where an embedded ad produced a “missing plug-in” error early on during the presentation. That means you won’t be able to watch any content from Hulu on the iPad and many embedded videos on blogs and other sites won’t play, either. Of course, some content will be available through dedicated apps, since many platforms have tried to get their video on the iPhone, which also doesn’t have Flash.

Finally, there’s no video camera integrated into the iPad, and Jobs didn’t announce any video accessories. However, I could see third-party companies jumping onto this, provided that Apple doesn’t somehow lock the dock interface. One possible application: a teleprompter for podcasters, complete with an attached camera. But enough with the speculation, let’s hear your thoughts: Do you think the iPad will make a good online video device? What are you going to use it for — or what’s gonna stop you from buying it?

For more on the iPad’s impact on online video, check Get Ready for the iPad to Change the Way You Watch Video.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Apple iPad Coverage: Across the GigaOM Network, and the Web – GigaOM Wednesday, January 27, 2010

    [...] Video On The iPad: HD, But No Flash [...]

  2. Yeah, I was hoping they wouldn’t go with a totally iPhone derived operating system that didn’t support flash on this device. No Flash is also the reason I still have as of yet to upgrade my iPhone from the standard 3g.

    Most of the sites I visit and work with have at least some Flash…if not completely done in this format. Aggravating to say the least.

    I think I’ll sit on the fence and wait to see if that feature comes available, and if it does……..then maybe I’ll upgrade my iPhone and by an iPad too. Otherwise I’m sitting on what I got

    1. Totally agree, Dale. Watching flash video and listening with flash audio players is a big part of my internet experience. I may still get one because I’m doubtful flash will ever come to iphone or ipad. Still, I’m curious about the HP slate, which has full Windows 7 on it.

  3. Correction, these are LED screens.

    1. It’s actually an LED-backlit LCD screen, so in a way we’re both right …

  4. Apple are one decent Android powered Tablet away from being upended.

    No Flash

    No Webcam

    No Multi Tasking

    Three lethal flaws from a device that needs to be more versatile than an iPhone and more portable than a Laptop.

    1. guitarfreak13 Mark Saturday, May 1, 2010

      hmm… multitasking is coming this summer in os 4.0

  5. Get Ready for the iPad to Change the Way You Watch Video Wednesday, January 27, 2010

    [...] it was “good enough” for watching video on the go. But with a 9.7″ screen, the iPad is basically a portable TV screen, ideal for consuming video anytime, [...]

  6. Come on Google give us a a nice tablet with a webcam. You can do it!

  7. Big disappointment. Just a larger Ipod Touch with 3G but I can’t carry it around in my pocket. Apple has shot itself in the foot 5 times – no computer OS, no flash, no webcam, no multitasking, no external memory.
    I can only see members of the Apple church buying it, but then they’d buy Steve Job’s old socks if they could.

    1. Don’t underestimate the Apple church. It now has more than 250 temples! :)

    2. Dude did you say socks – where can we get those??

      It does seems like Apple is always just a little lacking – just enough to be frustrating.

    3. So we could call it Isock

  8. No flash No problem with HTML 5

    1. Explain that to Hulu …

      1. i think you got that wrong – let hulu explain that to their advertisers when 100 million potential customers from the most desirable demographic can’t watch!

        (and no – i don’t think apple is going to sell 100,000,000 iPads in a hurry, but this affects iPhone and iPod touch users as well – and we know how that ‘limitation’ worked out so far)

  9. I’m still using the PowerBook G4 I got for Christmas 3 or 4 years ago. It works great, don’t get me wrong, but I was looking to replace it with something else with a matte screen. I wonder why no ability to, say, write a paper or compose a powerpoint presentation?? Now that would be worth $499! This over – sized iPhone, for those of us who already have one, not worth it.

    The iCal looked cool though, and if you were thinking about a Kindle-type device anyway, this is certainly worth a look.

    1. It does hae the ability to write a paper or compose a powerpoint presentation. In fact, the iPad version of iWork is probably one of the main reasons I’m interested in this device.

  10. Apple iPad: Die neue, alte Computing-Ära » netzwertig.com Wednesday, January 27, 2010

    [...] Das Apple iPad hat neben einem unglücklichen Namen auch das gleiche Manko wie das iPhone: Es unterstützt kein Flash. [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post