<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Maybe Consumer Web IPOs Won&#039;t Come Back This Year After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/27/so-maybe-consumer-web-ipos-wont-come-back-this-year-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/27/so-maybe-consumer-web-ipos-wont-come-back-this-year-after-all/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 07:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xpert Financial Offers Start-Ups An IPO Alternative: Tech News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/27/so-maybe-consumer-web-ipos-wont-come-back-this-year-after-all/#comment-563778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xpert Financial Offers Start-Ups An IPO Alternative: Tech News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=94886#comment-563778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] were 119 IPO filings, but that number increased to 263 in 2010, according to Renaissance Capital. Late-stage funding for big start-ups has also helped some of them delay going public. With XPO in their tool kit, start-ups can cash out [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were 119 IPO filings, but that number increased to 263 in 2010, according to Renaissance Capital. Late-stage funding for big start-ups has also helped some of them delay going public. With XPO in their tool kit, start-ups can cash out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Next IPO Boom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/27/so-maybe-consumer-web-ipos-wont-come-back-this-year-after-all/#comment-237938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Next IPO Boom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=94886#comment-237938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] IPO candidates. Yet it seems rather than rush for glory in the public markets, these companies are inclined instead to take in private equity and stay private. Facebook for example took a big slug from a Russian PE firm, and took itself out [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPO candidates. Yet it seems rather than rush for glory in the public markets, these companies are inclined instead to take in private equity and stay private. Facebook for example took a big slug from a Russian PE firm, and took itself out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadowlayer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/27/so-maybe-consumer-web-ipos-wont-come-back-this-year-after-all/#comment-237937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadowlayer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=94886#comment-237937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Didn&#039;t get an IPO, google rejected it (and made his own version) and yet some VC put $25M down in the 5th round?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Innovation my ass! If there&#039;s word that describes the Valley today that&#039;s INBREEDING&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t get an IPO, google rejected it (and made his own version) and yet some VC put $25M down in the 5th round?</p>
<p>Innovation my ass! If there&#8217;s word that describes the Valley today that&#8217;s INBREEDING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
