<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resurgent AOL Buys StudioNow, Hires ex-Googler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL Bets Another $100M On Online Video: Online Video News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-584096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AOL Bets Another $100M On Online Video: Online Video News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-584096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] firm. Video has been at the heart of that transformation, with AOL already investing heavily to acquire video startups StudioNow and 5min. AOL spent $74.1 million upfront for GoViral, with another $22.6 million being deferred [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] firm. Video has been at the heart of that transformation, with AOL already investing heavily to acquire video startups StudioNow and 5min. AOL spent $74.1 million upfront for GoViral, with another $22.6 million being deferred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Armstrong: AOL is Brands &#38; Platforms: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-287769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong: AOL is Brands &#38; Platforms: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-287769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the company&#8217;s recently announced video-serving technology, video production technology they recently acquired, StudioNow, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company&#8217;s recently announced video-serving technology, video production technology they recently acquired, StudioNow, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can You Crowdsource Journalism? Seed is Trying &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-237554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can You Crowdsource Journalism? Seed is Trying &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-237554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] expecting &#8220;light, fun questions&#8221; and that the project was an experiment (AOL recently bought a video-production studio called StudioNow to add to the Seed network). &#8220;The only way we&#8217;re going to learn about [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expecting &#8220;light, fun questions&#8221; and that the project was an experiment (AOL recently bought a video-production studio called StudioNow to add to the Seed network). &#8220;The only way we&#8217;re going to learn about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As Yahoo Compares Itself to TV, Content Acquisitions on the Way &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-237553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[As Yahoo Compares Itself to TV, Content Acquisitions on the Way &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-237553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Resurgent AOL Buys StudioNow, Hires&#160;ex-Googler  See All Articles &#187;      Will Creating a SWAT Team Help Google Get&#160;Social? [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Resurgent AOL Buys StudioNow, Hires&nbsp;ex-Googler  See All Articles &raquo;      Will Creating a SWAT Team Help Google Get&nbsp;Social? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-237552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-237552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think what we will see in the foreseeable future is attempts to create an information value of an given article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example it&#039;s rather simple to create a pane which highlight concepts. Different words describing the same concepts with no new flow in direction is pretty much no new info, even if worded totally different.  Dumping keywords might satisfy Google, but in a flow analysis it won&#039;t cut it.
Maybe we can even assign a value for quality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We will get there it&#039;s just a matter of making it affordable, just put one of those 80 (?) core Intel CPUs on everybody&#039;s desk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t expect AOL generated articles to add much in any direction, just rewording of existing texts. Which pretty much excludes them from an information driven system. Or they have to be really fast producing original texts.  Maybe they know that already and try to hide behind video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Point is we will get better junk filters bypassing simple keyword analysis.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what we will see in the foreseeable future is attempts to create an information value of an given article.</p>
<p>For example it&#8217;s rather simple to create a pane which highlight concepts. Different words describing the same concepts with no new flow in direction is pretty much no new info, even if worded totally different.  Dumping keywords might satisfy Google, but in a flow analysis it won&#8217;t cut it.<br />
Maybe we can even assign a value for quality.</p>
<p>We will get there it&#8217;s just a matter of making it affordable, just put one of those 80 (?) core Intel CPUs on everybody&#8217;s desk.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect AOL generated articles to add much in any direction, just rewording of existing texts. Which pretty much excludes them from an information driven system. Or they have to be really fast producing original texts.  Maybe they know that already and try to hide behind video.</p>
<p>Point is we will get better junk filters bypassing simple keyword analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resurgent AOL Buys StudioNow, Hires ex-Googler &#124; Robust Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/resurgent-aol-buys-studionow-hires-ex-googler/#comment-237551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Resurgent AOL Buys StudioNow, Hires ex-Googler &#124; Robust Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93752#comment-237551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Read more on GIGAOM&#8230;   Share this                    Hide Sites    $$(&#039;div.d336&#039;).each( function(e) { e.visualEffect(&#039;slide_up&#039;,{duration:0.5}) }); [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more on GIGAOM&#8230;   Share this                    Hide Sites    $$(&#39;div.d336&#39;).each( function(e) { e.visualEffect(&#39;slide_up&#39;,{duration:0.5}) }); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
