<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Q1 2010: Mad Money and Macs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple iPhone Production Points to Impending Verizon Deal: Analyst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple iPhone Production Points to Impending Verizon Deal: Analyst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Apple sold 8.75 million iPhones in the first three months of 2010. That&#8217;s a yearly run-rate of 35 million handsets, not far below the 40 million Kumar expects. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple sold 8.75 million iPhones in the first three months of 2010. That&#8217;s a yearly run-rate of 35 million handsets, not far below the 40 million Kumar expects. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Shareholder’s Meeting Roundup &#171; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Shareholder’s Meeting Roundup &#171; Tech News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its first quarter 2010 investor conference call, Apple announced it had $39.8 billion in the bank at the end of December 2009. The question now is, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its first quarter 2010 investor conference call, Apple announced it had $39.8 billion in the bank at the end of December 2009. The question now is, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Shareholder&#8217;s Meeting Roundup</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apple Shareholder&#8217;s Meeting Roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] its first quarter 2010 investor conference call, Apple announced it had $39.8 billion in the bank at the end of December 2009. The question now is, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its first quarter 2010 investor conference call, Apple announced it had $39.8 billion in the bank at the end of December 2009. The question now is, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Will Buy an iPad? &#171; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Will Buy an iPad? &#171; Tech News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] desire. Even in a challenging economy, people want Apple&#8217;s products, as this week&#8217;s financial results clearly demonstrate. The iPhone is far from essential. I can get a cheaper smartphone or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] desire. Even in a challenging economy, people want Apple&#8217;s products, as this week&#8217;s financial results clearly demonstrate. The iPhone is far from essential. I can get a cheaper smartphone or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Will Buy an iPad?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Will Buy an iPad?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] desire. Even in a challenging economy, people want Apple&#8217;s products, as this week&#8217;s financial results clearly demonstrate. The iPhone is far from essential. I can get a cheaper smartphone or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] desire. Even in a challenging economy, people want Apple&#8217;s products, as this week&#8217;s financial results clearly demonstrate. The iPhone is far from essential. I can get a cheaper smartphone or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skips</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2009Q1 Results that are reported in the table are &quot;bogus.&quot;  The correct values are Revenue $11.88 billion, EPS $2.50 and iPhone sales 4.363 million.  The values that are listed in the table are the amortized numbers that were reported in 2009 and are not comparable with the non-amortized numbers that are being reported today.  Apple restated all of the reports using the current rules to allow people to make correct comparisons of growth. (I am assuming that the 4.63 iPhones sold is simply a mistype of the value 4.363, which was reported both in 2009 and restated in 2010.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2009Q1 Results that are reported in the table are &#8220;bogus.&#8221;  The correct values are Revenue $11.88 billion, EPS $2.50 and iPhone sales 4.363 million.  The values that are listed in the table are the amortized numbers that were reported in 2009 and are not comparable with the non-amortized numbers that are being reported today.  Apple restated all of the reports using the current rules to allow people to make correct comparisons of growth. (I am assuming that the 4.63 iPhones sold is simply a mistype of the value 4.363, which was reported both in 2009 and restated in 2010.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apples finanser starka &#187; Datortekniskt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apples finanser starka &#187; Datortekniskt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Det går allt bättre för Apple; den senaste kvartalsrapporten visar på mycket starka siffror. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Det går allt bättre för Apple; den senaste kvartalsrapporten visar på mycket starka siffror. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Dead Prius Battery Will Cost You Thousands &#8211; Or Will It? &#124; Car Extended</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Dead Prius Battery Will Cost You Thousands &#8211; Or Will It? &#124; Car Extended]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Apple Q1 2010: Mad Money and Macs  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Q1 2010: Mad Money and Macs  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Jade</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Jade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got me :) I was totally caught by surprise when Apple changed accounting methods today and rushed before the conference call.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got me :) I was totally caught by surprise when Apple changed accounting methods today and rushed before the conference call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/25/apple-q1-2010-mad-money-and-macs/#comment-379120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theappleblog.com/?p=39685#comment-379120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EPS was actually $3.67 per share. the number you posted was dollar value of profit in billions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPS was actually $3.67 per share. the number you posted was dollar value of profit in billions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
