<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could the Supreme Court and Cablevision Help the Wireless Biz Get More Spectrum?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon B. Nuez Jr.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/#comment-237376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon B. Nuez Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93250#comment-237376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If the video is being run within a Flash player then - yes. I believe that the Adobe Flash Media Server uses port 1935. Verizon just looks for increase in traffic on port.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the video is being run within a Flash player then &#8211; yes. I believe that the Adobe Flash Media Server uses port 1935. Verizon just looks for increase in traffic on port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copterdriver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/#comment-237375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[copterdriver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93250#comment-237375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Having been using wireless to connect online for almost a year I can attest that the Verizon model is to slow you down anytime you are loading video, be it movies or just clips from news sites. You can watch the signal deteriorate every time, even if you are next to the very tower feeding your connection. Seems they have an algorithm that sees your feed source and throttles the connection. As soon as I kill that feed it goes back to full connection status....&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been using wireless to connect online for almost a year I can attest that the Verizon model is to slow you down anytime you are loading video, be it movies or just clips from news sites. You can watch the signal deteriorate every time, even if you are next to the very tower feeding your connection. Seems they have an algorithm that sees your feed source and throttles the connection. As soon as I kill that feed it goes back to full connection status&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/#comment-237374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93250#comment-237374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;has AT&amp;T or verizon either used any or even have any plans for the 1700/2100 mhz spectrum they already own?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i am all for freeing up more spectrum but it should come with use or lose stipulations to make sure the public benefits. in my opinion until the extisting spectrum has been used any new spectrum should only be able to be bid on by alternative startup telecos and not hoarders AT&amp;T and verizon.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has AT&amp;T or verizon either used any or even have any plans for the 1700/2100 mhz spectrum they already own?</p>
<p>i am all for freeing up more spectrum but it should come with use or lose stipulations to make sure the public benefits. in my opinion until the extisting spectrum has been used any new spectrum should only be able to be bid on by alternative startup telecos and not hoarders AT&amp;T and verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon B. Nuez Jr.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/could-the-supreme-court-and-cablevision-help-the-wireless-biz-get-more-spectrum/#comment-237373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon B. Nuez Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=93250#comment-237373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I hate to say it but I would rather see these local broadcasting stations go away. Especially, if it means that &quot;we&quot; would get back very the valuable broadcasting spectrum. With data hungry devices like tablets and handsets becoming more common - how are companies like AT&amp;T and Verizon going to support it&#039;s customer base?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the local broadcast companies there might be a &quot;second life&quot; on YouTube or Vimeo?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it but I would rather see these local broadcasting stations go away. Especially, if it means that &#8220;we&#8221; would get back very the valuable broadcasting spectrum. With data hungry devices like tablets and handsets becoming more common &#8211; how are companies like AT&amp;T and Verizon going to support it&#8217;s customer base?</p>
<p>As for the local broadcast companies there might be a &#8220;second life&#8221; on YouTube or Vimeo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
