<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype to FCC: Keep the Internet Open &amp; Neutral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/14/skype-to-fcc-keep-internet-open-neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/14/skype-to-fcc-keep-internet-open-neutral/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/14/skype-to-fcc-keep-internet-open-neutral/#comment-236535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=91672#comment-236535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Richard,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not sure if you know what you are talking about. Skype is indeed a P2p application. Your probably like the rest of the population that as soon as they hear &quot;P2P&quot; they think kazza or limewire.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Try looking into P2P telephony.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>Not sure if you know what you are talking about. Skype is indeed a P2p application. Your probably like the rest of the population that as soon as they hear &#8220;P2P&#8221; they think kazza or limewire.</p>
<p>Try looking into P2P telephony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/14/skype-to-fcc-keep-internet-open-neutral/#comment-236534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 03:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=91672#comment-236534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Skype&#039;s comments illustrate what a clueless bunch their management team is. Describing Skype as a &quot;P2P application&quot; is factually wrong, laughably so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Given that they don&#039;t understand the system the Skype founders created, it&#039;s no wonder that the management team argues for regulations that will do the company more harm than good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The real story here is how the current managers took over the company.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype&#8217;s comments illustrate what a clueless bunch their management team is. Describing Skype as a &#8220;P2P application&#8221; is factually wrong, laughably so.</p>
<p>Given that they don&#8217;t understand the system the Skype founders created, it&#8217;s no wonder that the management team argues for regulations that will do the company more harm than good.</p>
<p>The real story here is how the current managers took over the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/14/skype-to-fcc-keep-internet-open-neutral/#comment-236533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Glass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/?p=91672#comment-236533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;How come GigaOm is highlighting Skype&#039;s highly predictable comments (which essentially call for the FCC to hamstring ISPs so that it can make money at their expense) instead of more novel and insightful ones?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come GigaOm is highlighting Skype&#8217;s highly predictable comments (which essentially call for the FCC to hamstring ISPs so that it can make money at their expense) instead of more novel and insightful ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
