2 Comments

Summary:

NCTA president Kyle McSlarrow today issued an extended rebuttal to charges from consumer watchdog group Free Press that TV Everywhere initiatives stemmed from collusion among cable programmers and distributors to stifle competition in the online video market. Based on a report it issued entitled TV Competition […]

NCTA president Kyle McSlarrow today issued an extended rebuttal to charges from consumer watchdog group Free Press that TV Everywhere initiatives stemmed from collusion among cable programmers and distributors to stifle competition in the online video market.

Based on a report it issued entitled TV Competition Nowhere: How the Cable Industry Is Colluding to Kill Online TV, Free Press called for an investigation by federal antitrust agencies and Congress into the anti-competitive nature of TV Everywhere programs.

Arguing that the cable incumbents are using TV Everywhere as a way to “preserve the current market structure and prevent disruptive competition,” the group also chides the industry for not including online-only distributors of content. “By design, this plan will exclude disruptive new entrants and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers,” the report claims.

In arguing against Free Press’ claims that TV Everywhere would lead to less online video competition, McSlarrow writes that the group has things entirely backward, and that the initiative “is an effort to ensure more content than ever is distributed over the Internet at no extra charge to consumers.” But more importantly, the NCTA prez called the claims of collusion hooey, saying “the TV Everywhere concept involves a multitude of competing program networks, most of which distribute their content on competing cable, satellite, telephone and online platforms.”

Of course, given all the different stakeholders it’s difficult to see how the different operators could have colluded, especially since each of them has different plans for what their TV Everywhere service is going to be like. Rather than put the power in the hands of the incumbent cable operators, McSlarrow argues that the online distribution of content on TV Everywhere is decided by content programmers that make the decisions about what is put online and how. “So, Free Press is really complaining about the decisions content owners make as to how their content should be distributed,” he writes.

While McSlarrow spoke up for most cable operators, Time Warner issued its own statement to refute Free Press’ claims: “Time Warner is committed to providing consumers who subscribe to cable, satellite, telephone or other multi-video platforms with more value for their money, by allowing them to watch their favorite shows when they want to watch them on both their TVs and over the Internet at no additional charge. That is what TV Everywhere is, and it is quite plainly beneficial for consumers. We will also continue to pursue many other ways to distribute in a safe and secure way over the Internet our content to people, whether or not they subscribe to a video service.”

  1. Free Press advisor Ammori is on-point with his observation of this as an anti-trust violation. Amazingly members of the coalition, Free Press and Media Access Project have failed to realize there are career-level staff employees in FCC’s Media (formerly Cable Services) Bureau that for years have assisted cable operators effectively exercise “anti-trust” actions in thwarting programmers attempting to take advantage of commercial leased access.
    One glaring example was when the bureau totally ignored language in FCC rules that say operators are to place leased access content on a channel ‘used by most’ subscribers and decreed it was permissible to put leased access on any digital channel as long it serves more than 50 percent of the total subscribers. The result has been cable operators now offer local businesses advertising opportunity to be on their own local origination channels instead of their competitor’s leased access channel often reaching at best maybe 65 percent of the subscribers. Many leased access programmers use Internet TV where the shows can be viewed by anyone with adequate broadband service making ‘Net Neutrality’ vital to competing with the cable giants’ IPTV content.
    NCTA has the Media Bureau, they really don’t need any other help

    Share
  2. I just donated some money to Free Press. :)

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post