<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#039;s To-Do List for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google the 21st Century Conglomerate? Bad Idea &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google the 21st Century Conglomerate? Bad Idea &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] more, the new initiatives are costly. Analysts have worried about how much a Nexus One could hurt profits if Google decides to eat some of the subsidies often necessary with mobile phones. Now, they are [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more, the new initiatives are costly. Analysts have worried about how much a Nexus One could hurt profits if Google decides to eat some of the subsidies often necessary with mobile phones. Now, they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forbes On Rubicon Project Consortium; M&#38;A Talk For iCrossing; Pull Over! NAI Busts 10 Ad Networks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forbes On Rubicon Project Consortium; M&#38;A Talk For iCrossing; Pull Over! NAI Busts 10 Ad Networks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] new advertisers online — it’s about getting online shoppers to notice display ads again.&quot; Read more. The click died a while ago.. but many still look at it as the key success metric no matter what [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new advertisers online — it’s about getting online shoppers to notice display ads again.&quot; Read more. The click died a while ago.. but many still look at it as the key success metric no matter what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ce que devrait faire Google en 2010 &#124; Pure geek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ce que devrait faire Google en 2010 &#124; Pure geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] : GigaOM (02 janvier 2010)    Share and [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : GigaOM (02 janvier 2010)    Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I expect Google to attack a more lucrative area - Credit Cards (aka Google Checkout) which so far has been dominated by New York firms at high cost to consumers and merchants and is ripe for superior technological solutions.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect Google to attack a more lucrative area &#8211; Credit Cards (aka Google Checkout) which so far has been dominated by New York firms at high cost to consumers and merchants and is ripe for superior technological solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 reasons why the Google Nexus One will not trouble the iPhone &#187; Techilicious</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[5 reasons why the Google Nexus One will not trouble the iPhone &#187; Techilicious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] of quality apps: As Om Malik rightly points out, its time for Google to invest a lot of time in improving the Android market. Big name developers [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of quality apps: As Om Malik rightly points out, its time for Google to invest a lot of time in improving the Android market. Big name developers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Very please to see #1... the effectiveness of display ads is a problem I&#039;ve struggled with. And yes, this is a blatant plug in a way, but I&#039;m very excited to have a working prototype of what I call a #SmartAd, which is a Flash ad that advertisers can update via Twitter (by using the #SmartAd hashtag). A working example can now be seen with @IslandTresses ad on marthasvineyardyoga.com. I hope that making ads Social will inject new life and effectiveness into the ads we&#039;ve all trained ourselves to ignore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A strong footnote for #2 should be augmented reality - here&#039;s another area where Google is already racking up a lot of cred in my book. Goggles&#039; initial success tells me that AR is going to be very important in emergent tech this year.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very please to see #1&#8230; the effectiveness of display ads is a problem I&#8217;ve struggled with. And yes, this is a blatant plug in a way, but I&#8217;m very excited to have a working prototype of what I call a #SmartAd, which is a Flash ad that advertisers can update via Twitter (by using the #SmartAd hashtag). A working example can now be seen with @IslandTresses ad on marthasvineyardyoga.com. I hope that making ads Social will inject new life and effectiveness into the ads we&#8217;ve all trained ourselves to ignore.</p>
<p>A strong footnote for #2 should be augmented reality &#8211; here&#8217;s another area where Google is already racking up a lot of cred in my book. Goggles&#8217; initial success tells me that AR is going to be very important in emergent tech this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookie Monster</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cookie Monster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I disagree that 100,000 apps is something to shoot for. Too many of the iPhone apps are shovelware. You have companies out there that are focused on just creating as many apps as possible because they know a few people will buy them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d much rather see a smaller number of higher quality, more useful apps on Android. But unfortunately I suspect that if Android takes off it will get the same crap.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that 100,000 apps is something to shoot for. Too many of the iPhone apps are shovelware. You have companies out there that are focused on just creating as many apps as possible because they know a few people will buy them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see a smaller number of higher quality, more useful apps on Android. But unfortunately I suspect that if Android takes off it will get the same crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ana ulin .org &#8212; &#34;Google faces other issues it needs to address longer-term, such as improving its position in popular&#8230;&#34;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ana ulin .org &#8212; &#34;Google faces other issues it needs to address longer-term, such as improving its position in popular&#8230;&#34;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] &#8211; Google’s To-Do List for 2010 – GigaOM [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Google’s To-Do List for 2010 – GigaOM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Better search, no more link farms with junk text.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wanted to build a tunnel maze with my son for his Gerbils. Since they destroy everything, what better to use then Bamboo? So a quick search for Bamboo poles in our area. Result pages on Google all junk. Link farms with clearly no info even a &quot;Page coming soon&quot; showed up under the first 3 Google returns(with links sponsored by Bing). Pathetic. Bing was a little better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think keyword search will prosper in this decade.  Looks to me like the spammers and scamers are better at analyzing and reverse engineering (Page Rank) then Google and Microsoft is in analyzing their stupid scam pages.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Better search, no more link farms with junk text.</li>
</ol>
<p>I wanted to build a tunnel maze with my son for his Gerbils. Since they destroy everything, what better to use then Bamboo? So a quick search for Bamboo poles in our area. Result pages on Google all junk. Link farms with clearly no info even a &#8220;Page coming soon&#8221; showed up under the first 3 Google returns(with links sponsored by Bing). Pathetic. Bing was a little better.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think keyword search will prosper in this decade.  Looks to me like the spammers and scamers are better at analyzing and reverse engineering (Page Rank) then Google and Microsoft is in analyzing their stupid scam pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;it&#039;s a pitty that you never click on ads.. advertisers should put some information or useful program on another side.. personaly i think that web publishers should not only earn from ads in $ but also in &quot;click&quot; that will bring traffic &quot;back&quot; to their website/blog&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a pitty that you never click on ads.. advertisers should put some information or useful program on another side.. personaly i think that web publishers should not only earn from ads in $ but also in &#8220;click&#8221; that will bring traffic &#8220;back&#8221; to their website/blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One thing that needs to change in 2010 &#8211; advertising models</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/01/02/googles-to-do-list-for-2010/#comment-234735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[One thing that needs to change in 2010 &#8211; advertising models]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=88496#comment-234735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Kevin Kelleher talks about this in his To-Do List for Google post at GigaOM and how at the same time display ad revenues have been dropping in general they have been on the rise on mobile devices. While I agree with Kevin when he says it is about getting online shoppers noticing display ads again I think it is going to be a much bigger up hill climb that he, or others think. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kevin Kelleher talks about this in his To-Do List for Google post at GigaOM and how at the same time display ad revenues have been dropping in general they have been on the rise on mobile devices. While I agree with Kevin when he says it is about getting online shoppers noticing display ads again I think it is going to be a much bigger up hill climb that he, or others think. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

