<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom Withdraws Videos Its Employees Uploaded From YouTube Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 08:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube Accuses Viacom of Uploading Clips, Making Its Life Difficult</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/#comment-479392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YouTube Accuses Viacom of Uploading Clips, Making Its Life Difficult]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=39121#comment-479392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Viacom&#8217;s actions would have made policing its content impossible. YouTube accuses Viacom of uploading its own content, and doing so in a way that made it difficult for YouTube to distinguish between its employees and [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viacom&#8217;s actions would have made policing its content impossible. YouTube accuses Viacom of uploading its own content, and doing so in a way that made it difficult for YouTube to distinguish between its employees and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/#comment-479391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=39121#comment-479391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What you&#039;re missing, n, is that the studios have a right to publicize their movies however they want.  They own them.  If YouTube is doing the same thing with the content as the studios, it&#039;s patently illegal, unless YouTube has acquired the rights.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I certainly don&#039;t have the same right to use your property as you do.  If I steal &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; car to deliver pizzas, my defense can&#039;t be: &quot;n delivers pizzas in this car, so I&#039;m obviously allowed the same privilege.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;re missing, n, is that the studios have a right to publicize their movies however they want.  They own them.  If YouTube is doing the same thing with the content as the studios, it&#8217;s patently illegal, unless YouTube has acquired the rights.</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t have the same right to use your property as you do.  If I steal <em>your</em> car to deliver pizzas, my defense can&#8217;t be: &#8220;n delivers pizzas in this car, so I&#8217;m obviously allowed the same privilege.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/#comment-479390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=39121#comment-479390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;the issue here is that the sudios did the same thing that they are accusing the &quot;bad youtube&quot; lol of. If they want to get onto someone, they have to sue themselves too.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the issue here is that the sudios did the same thing that they are accusing the &#8220;bad youtube&#8221; lol of. If they want to get onto someone, they have to sue themselves too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixelm1</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2009/12/30/viacom-withdraws-videos-its-employees-uploaded-from-youtube-lawsuit/#comment-479389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pixelm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=39121#comment-479389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well - 250 clips out of 63,000 makes it seem like a YT or Google employee or two might have noticed that a couple out of the 62,800 left might have been infringing.  It&#039;s not like Viacom posted thousands of old south park episodes or a whole movie in 10 parts for promotional purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; 250 clips out of 63,000 makes it seem like a YT or Google employee or two might have noticed that a couple out of the 62,800 left might have been infringing.  It&#8217;s not like Viacom posted thousands of old south park episodes or a whole movie in 10 parts for promotional purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
