Comments on: Local TV Industry Revenues Down 22% for the Year http://gigaom.com/2009/12/28/tv-industry-revenues-down-22-for-the-year/ Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: murat bilgili http://gigaom.com/2009/12/28/tv-industry-revenues-down-22-for-the-year/#comment-479170 Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:06:48 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=38847#comment-479170 TV and the studios are on a downward spiral, but it has nothing to do with ad sales. It has a lot to do with idiocy in the new conglomerate system. That good :) Thank you
maxi|bilgili|td

]]> By: Liz Gannes http://gigaom.com/2009/12/28/tv-industry-revenues-down-22-for-the-year/#comment-479169 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:19:13 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=38847#comment-479169 @Todd – I didn’t attribute the TV drop to the ascendancy of online viewing, just said that spending dropping in one place might mean growth in another, which seems logical since it’s cheaper/increasingly measurable/emerging.

]]> By: Todd http://gigaom.com/2009/12/28/tv-industry-revenues-down-22-for-the-year/#comment-479168 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:22:34 +0000 http://newteevee.com/?p=38847#comment-479168 If you think 20% down is a sign of an ascendancy in online viewing, or has anything to do with the shift to the internet, then you might want to blow the dust off that old textbook, “Idiots Guide to Journalism”. This is just a slight correction caused by the credit crunch and ad money shifting to the network web portals.

TV and the studios are on a downward spiral, but it has nothing to do with ad sales. It has a lot to do with idiocy in the new conglomerate system.

]]>