20 Comments

Summary:

So, after years of speculation, debate and rumor-upon-rumor, the mythical tablet device from Apple is, it seems, here. In a matter of weeks we expect Steve Jobs to take to the stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco and deliver the announcement […]

islate_thumb

So, after years of speculation, debate and rumor-upon-rumor, the mythical tablet device from Apple is, it seems, here. In a matter of weeks we expect Steve Jobs to take to the stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco and deliver the announcement we’ve all been waiting for.

And when he does, will he call the legendary tablet an “iSlate”? He will, if the current crop of fresh rumors prove correct.

MacRumors has been doing a fair bit of digging and, despite some cunning digital sleight of hand by the boys and girls in Cupertino, has discovered that the domain name islate.com is registered to Apple. MacRumors has this to say on the tortuous history of the iSlate domain;

The iSlate.com domain was originally registered in October 2004 by a company called Eurobox Ltd. It later changed hands to Data Docket, Inc. in 2006. In 2007, however, the domain was transferred to registrar MarkMonitor.com. MarkMonitor handles domain name registrations and trademark protections for many companies, including Apple. As is typical, however, the name of the actual registrant was initially hidden to obscure the identify of the actual owner.

[...] after further investigation of the domain name registrant history, it seems Apple’s name was temporarily exposed as the actual owner of “iSlate.com” for several weeks in late 2007. It was changed back within a few weeks…

And the triumphant icing on this little cake of investigative journalism is a screenshot of the registrant details [image by MacRumors];

Of course, the question now is whether this is the real, final name of the device or some sort of devious distraction designed to throw curious cats off the scent. Would Steve Jobs really have settled on a name for a brand new device so many years before going to market?

Trademarks, Ghost Companies and Name Drops

But wait, there’s more. Not to be outdone in the art of digging through obscure, dusty microfiche in the darkened basement of the Internet, TechCrunch has found compelling ties between Apple and various legal and business entities indicating they not only own the iSlate domain, but also the iSlate trademark, in several key territories including the United Kingdom, France, Japan and China.

Furthermore, in the United States, the iSlate trademark is registered to a company called “Slate Computing.” TechCrunch offer a compelling trail of breadcrumbs that lead from Slate Computing right back to Apple. It’s a somewhat convoluted path that takes quite a number of dastardly administrative twists and turns, but if you stick with it, the conclusion is fairly compelling. Take a look, it’s definitely worth a read.

And then there’s that name-drop by New York Times editor Bill Keller, which I wrote about here back in October. Keller’s comments during a speech he made to a gathering of the NYT staff included the use of the word “slate” which was notable at a time when most people were still just using the noun “tablet” to describe Apple’s mythical device;

I’m hoping we can get the newsroom more actively involved in the challenge of delivering our best journalism in the form of Times Reader, iPhone apps, WAP, or the impending Apple slate, or whatever comes after that.

(You can watch the video of the speech here, just scooch forward about eight minutes.)

So was Keller inadvertently dropping the name of Apple’s upcoming tablet? It’s not beyond the realm of possibility; after all, rumor has it Apple has been secretly meeting with major publishers (including the New York Times) in the latter half of this year, presumably offering guidance and advice on how best to leverage their new platform for content delivery. As a senior editor, it’s entirely reasonable to assume Keller would have been privy to that information, possibly even present during one of those meetings.

Devil’s Advocate

On the other hand, is it more likely that this is simply one of dozens – possibly hundreds – of domains Apple has snapped-up over the years to protect their iProduct branding? Some of the more obvious domains actually do something useful and redirect to product pages on apple.com (see what happens if you try to go to ipod.com or imac.com). At the moment, however, islate.com goes nowhere. At the moment.

Personally, I don’t dislike it. I can see some of the more dumb abuses it invites; iSlate – Eye-s-late? As in, “I ‘s late… for this meeting.” There are probably more. Share your own in the comments below, let us know what you think of the name, or just let us know if you think this is a red herring.

Related research

Subscriber Content

Subscriber content comes from Gigaom Research, bridging the gap between breaking news and long-tail research. Visit any of our reports to learn more and subscribe.

You're subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

Related stories

  1. [...] via Tablet to be Called iSlate?. [...]

    Share
  2. Matthew Porter Monday, December 28, 2009

    Is it just me, or is “iSlate” a terrible name?

    For starters, it could be “is late”, which I guess Apple is to this market.

    iTablet is also a terrible name, on account of the fact it sounds like something you would take for a headache (and I’m sure Apple want to avoid any such reference).

    Just my 2c.

    Share
  3. It also sounds like “Isolate” when said aloud…

    Share
  4. And their were a time when people only talked on how bad of a name iMac, iPod and iPhone were.

    Share
    1. Matthew Porter Monday, December 28, 2009

      @Omar,

      Good point. However, I stand by my comment – even if I will likely be lining up for an “Is late” when they are released. :)

      Share
  5. I agree with Omar. When first announced, “iPod” sounded odd, particularly in contrast to seemingly more apt terms like “iTune” and “iMusic.” Little did we know all the plans Apple had for this little gadget. I still like my aging iPod mini and use it to listen to podcasts while showering and shaving, but I love my iPod touch and hardly ever leave home without it.

    The same far-sighted reasoning could be true of “iSlate.” Like “”iPod” it’s one syllable and hence slips off the tongue easily. It’s also a new term and thus doesn’t have the psychological baggage that’d accompany “iTablet,” particularly given how many people have had bad experiences with tablet PCs.

    Recall that a tablet is a wimpy, clunky PC. Like iPod, an iSlate can be almost anything imaginable.

    Interesting that just last week I was talking with a nephew about how an iPhone’s features run circles around the clunky “Tricorder” of classic Star Trek shows. It does much more in a far smaller package. The future arrived much sooner than we thought.

    Share
    1. There’s really an app for reading vital signs with your iPhone!? :P

      You have a point with the syllables, though. All of the other Apple brand names have two syllables: iMac, MacBook, Mac Pro, iWork (Pages, Keynote, Numbers), iPod, iPhone,… Hadn’t really thought about that before!

      Share
  6. @ Omar:

    You are wrong about the names. The only reason (some) people didn’t like the name “iMac” at the time was that it was the first of the “i” names and sounded odd for that reason.

    The iPod on the other hand got a great reception and it’s just false to assert there were any substantial group of people opposed to the name or that didn’t like it. Only people who have never read science fiction don’t understand what it means and many to this day (falsely) assert that the term “pod” is a made-up meaningless term for that same reason.

    Similarly, virtually no one really ever talked about how “bad” a name the iPhone was. These things just didn’t happen despite what you say.

    Personally, I think iSlate is a bad name in that it references things that no living person cares or knows about (School “slates” in the 19th century). “iPad” is a much better choice and not only references the products the tablet is trying to replace, but also fits better with “iPod” and “iPhone.”

    Share
  7. I love my iphone and macbook as much as the next guy. And while I am interested to see if there is any interesting new tech to be unveiled in an Apple tablet, this cycle of rumors that has been going on for several years is exhausting. So much so, that part of me hopes that Jobs walks off that stage at the end of the show with nary a mention of a tablet.

    I realize that this potentially instigating comment to the apple diehards will be met with possible “troll” accusations, but that is not my intent. I just find humor in this cycle and as long as I still do, my selfishness compels me to want to see it once again.

    I’m not of a fan of the term “iSlate”, but I will concede that ipod was met with the same apprehension.

    Share
  8. Well, we won’t know what they will call it until Steve tells us. My money’s on “MagicSlate”.

    Share
  9. I say it should be called the MacBook Touch. If it is going to be running this tweaked version of OS X

    Share
  10. personal I like href=http://www.newappletech.com>Apple Tablet. I mean how many times can you use “i” in front of a product name.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post